Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 3, 2009
Human Reproduction 2009 24(11):2693-2702; doi:10.1093/humrep/dep284
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/11/2693    most recent
dep284v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rahkonen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Paavonen, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rahkonen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Paavonen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Factors affecting matrix metalloproteinase-8 levels in the vaginal and cervical fluids in the first and second trimester of pregnancy

Leena Rahkonen1,3, Eeva-Marja Rutanen1, Leila Unkila-Kallio1, Mika Nuutila1, Pekka Nieminen1, Timo Sorsa2 and Jorma Paavonen1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, 00029 Helsinki, Finland 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

3 Correspondence address. E-mail leena.rahkonen{at}hus.fi

BACKGROUND: Cervical ripening during pregnancy resembles an inflammatory process. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), particularly MMP-8, have been linked to inflammatory processes. We studied the concentrations of, and factors associated with, MMP-8 in the lower genital tract fluids in the first and second trimesters.

METHODS: In a prospective population-based cohort study, vaginal and cervical swab samples were obtained from 2130 unselected pregnant women undergoing their first and second trimester ultrasound screening. MMP-8 was determined by immunofluorometric assay. Use of antibiotics, history of vaginal bleeding, and history of sexual intercourse were recorded on both occasions. Vaginal smears were obtained for Gram-staining and leukocyte counting. Cervical length was measured by ultrasonography. The main outcome measures were MMP-8 concentrations in the vagina and cervix.

RESULTS: The median (range) MMP-8 concentrations in vaginal and cervical samples were 107.4 µg/l (undetectable–2406.6 µg/l) and 318.3 µg/l (0.1–2074.6 µg/l), respectively, in the first trimester, and 112.5 µg/l (undetectable–2093.4 µg/l) and 344.8 µg/l (0.4–1783.5 µg/l), respectively, in the second trimester. Multiparity and vaginal leukocytosis were both associated with increased MMP-8 concentrations in vaginal and cervical samples in both trimesters. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) was associated with increased vaginal and cervical MMP-8 in the first trimester, but only with increased vaginal MMP-8 in the second trimester. A history of sexual intercourse (in the previous 48 h) was associated with lower MMP-8 concentrations in cervical samples in both trimesters.

CONCLUSIONS: MMP-8 concentrations were lower in vaginal samples than in cervical samples, and no difference was found between the first and second trimesters. Multiparity, BV and an elevated leukocyte count in the vagina were associated with increased MMP-8 concentrations. Sexual intercourse had an opposite effect. The study suggests that MMP-8 is a physiologic constituent in lower genital tract fluids, where it may be involved in host response to inflammatory and infectious processes.

Key words: matrix metalloproteinase-8/biomarker/pregnancy/lower genital tract

Submitted on April 16, 2009; resubmitted on May 25, 2009; accepted on June 4, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.