Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 17, 2009
Human Reproduction 2009 24(11):2755-2759; doi:10.1093/humrep/dep254
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High basal LH levels in combination with low basal FSH levels are associated with high success rates at assisted reproduction
1 Carl von Linné Clinic, Uppsala Science Park, S-751 83 Uppsala, Sweden 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mälarsjukhuset, S-631 88 Eskilstuna, Sweden 3 Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Akademiska sjukhuset, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden 4 Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Akademiska sjukhuset, UCR, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
5 Correspondence address. thomasbrodin{at}telia.com
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the associations of basal gonadotrophins with pregnancy and delivery rates at IVF/ICSI.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at a university-affiliated private infertility centre. Patients were 745 women, who underwent 1328 IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. Basal FSH, basal LH and combinations of FSH and LH versus treatment data and pregnancy and delivery rates were measured.
RESULTS: Combinations of FSH and LH gave significantly better information than the LH:FSH ratio, or each gonadotrophin alone: highest mean pregnancy rate (39%) was achieved in women with low FSH (<6.7 U/l) and with high LH levels (>4.9 U/l), whereas pregnancy rate was lowest (22%) in women with high FSH and low LH levels. Pregnancy rates were intermediate (27–28%) if FSH and LH were either both low or both high (P for trend = 0.0004). Associations to delivery rates and measures of ovarian response and embryo quality followed the same pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: Basal LH modifies and improves the information given by basal FSH alone. Low FSH level combined with high LH probably reflects a well-preserved ovarian reserve and is associated with the highest success rates at IVF/ICSI.
Key words: FSH/infertility/IVF/ICSI outcome/luteinizing hormone/ovarian reserve
Submitted on February 8, 2009; resubmitted on April 23, 2009; accepted on June 17, 2009.