Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on October 16, 2008
Human Reproduction 2009 24(2):300-307; doi:10.1093/humrep/den368
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/2/300    most recent
den368v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Hum. Reprod.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meintjes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Madden, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meintjes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Madden, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A controlled randomized trial evaluating the effect of lowered incubator oxygen tension on live births in a predominantly blastocyst transfer program{dagger}

Marius Meintjes1,3, Samuel J. Chantilis2, James D. Douglas2, Alfred J. Rodriguez2, Ali R. Guerami2, David M. Bookout2, Brian D. Barnett2 and James D. Madden1

1 Frisco Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Frisco, TX 75034, USA 2 Presbyterian Hospital ARTS Program, Dallas, TX 75231, USA

3 Corresponding address. PO Box 703575, Dallas, TX 75370, USA. Fax: +1-972-382-3093. E-mail: mariusmeintjes{at}aol.com

BACKGROUND: The potentially damaging effect of free O2 radicals to cultured embryos may be reduced by adding scavengers to the culture media or by reducing the incubator O2 levels. However, lowering the O2 in the culture environment can be expensive, troublesome and may not be justifiable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of lowered incubator O2 tension on live birth rates in a predominately Day 5 embryo transfer program.

METHODS: Two hundred and thirty first-cycle women undergoing routine IVF or ICSI with ejaculated sperm were randomized in a prospective clinical trial and stratified for patient age and physician. Embryos of patients were randomly assigned for culture in either a 21% O2 (atmospheric) or 5% O2 (reduced) environment. Clinical endpoints monitored were rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth and blastocyst cryopreservation.

RESULTS: Embryos cultured in a 5% O2 environment consistently resulted in higher rates of live birth implantation (106/247, 42.9% versus 82/267, 30.7%; difference of 12.2% with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.9–20.3, P = 0.005) and live births (66/115, 57.4% versus 49/115, 42.6%; difference of 14.8% with 95% CI of 1.9–27.0, P = 0.043) when compared with rates among women whose embryos were cultured in an atmospheric O2 environment.

CONCLUSIONS: The overall increase in live births demonstrated by this study indicates that the effort and expense to culture embryos in a low-O2 environment is justified. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov. NCT00708487 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .

Key words: IVF/human/oxygen/blastocyst/live birth


{dagger} Partially presented as a poster at the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA, Fertil Steril 2000;74(Suppl):S256.

Submitted on June 24, 2008; resubmitted on September 7, 2008; accepted on September 11, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Hum. Reprod.:

Editor's Choice
André Van Steirteghem
Hum. Reprod. 2009 24: 253. [Extract] [Full Text]  





Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.