Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on January 21, 2009
Human Reproduction 2009 24(5):1099-1105; doi:10.1093/humrep/den495
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/5/1099    most recent
den495v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, K.
Right arrow Articles by Grace, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, K.
Right arrow Articles by Grace, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Parental information sharing with donor insemination conceived offspring: a follow-up study

Ken Daniels1,3, Wayne Gillett2 and Victoria Grace1

1 University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand 2 University of Otago, PO Box 9001, Dunedin, New Zealand

3 Correspondence address. E-mail: Ken.daniels{at}canterbury.ac.nz

BACKGROUND: Studies of parental decision making regarding information sharing with offspring conceived as a result of donor insemination are almost all based on a ‘one point in time’ design. This study reports on parental decision making at two points in time, Time 1 and Time 2, 14 years apart.

METHODS: Forty-four of 57 families (77%) who had agreed to take part in a follow-up study were interviewed. An in-depth semi-structured interview format was used. In addition, two questionnaires seeking mainly quantitative data were administered.

RESULTS: Fifteen families (35%) had told their offspring of the donor insemination conception at Time 2 (2004). An additional seven families said they had always wanted or intended to tell the children and asked for assistance on how to do this. Where partners were in agreement on information sharing at Time 1 (1990)—either to tell or not to tell—this position was maintained. Where there was disagreement, or uncertainty, two-thirds had not told and one-third had.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the professional and socio-political culture at the time of treatment, almost half of the families in this study ended up sharing the donor insemination conception with their offspring. The results support the need for appropriate preparation for donor insemination family building.

Key words: donor insemination/disclosure/parent decision making

Submitted on October 28, 2008; resubmitted on December 9, 2008; accepted on December 15, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.