Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on February 26, 2009
Human Reproduction 2009 24(6):1436-1445; doi:10.1093/humrep/dep039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/6/1436    most recent
dep039v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haouzi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hamamah, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haouzi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hamamah, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients

D. Haouzi1,2,3,4, S. Assou1,3,4, K. Mahmoud5, S. Tondeur1,3,4, T. Rème1,3,4, B. Hedon2, J. De Vos1,3,4 and S. Hamamah1,2,3,4,6

1 CHU Montpellier, Institut de Recherche en Biothérapie, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier F-34000, France 2 CHU Montpellier, Département de Médecine et Biologie de la Reproduction, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier F-34295, France 3 INSERM U 847, Montpellier F-34000, France 4 Université Montpellier1, UFR de Médecine, Laboratoire ‘Développement embryonnaire précoce et cellules souches embryonnaires humaines’, Montpellier F-34000, France 5 Centre de FIV, Clinique les Jardins, Tunis, Tunisia

6 Correspondence address. ART/PGD Division, Département de Médecine et Biologie de la Reproduction, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier F-34295, France. Tel: +33-04-67-33-64-04; Fax: +33-04-67-33-62-90; E-mail: s-hamamah{at}chu-montpellier.fr

BACKGROUND: The adjunction of exogenous hormones for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) may alter endometrial receptiveness. In order to identify the genes misregulated under COS, we compared the endometrium gene expression profiles, from the same patients, in a natural cycle and in a subsequent COS cycle.

METHODS: For the same normal-responder patients (n = 21), endometrial biopsies (n = 84) were collected during the pre-receptive (LH + 2) and receptive stages (LH + 7) of a natural cycle and, subsequently, on oocyte retrieval day (hCG + 2) and on transfer day (hCG + 5) of a stimulated cycle. Samples were analyzed using DNA microarrays. Gene expression profiles and biological pathways involved in endometrial receptivity were analyzed.

RESULTS: Although endometrium transition profiles from pre-receptive to receptive phases are similar between patients, COS regimens alter endometrial receptivity in comparison with natural cycle. Under COS conditions, two endometrial profiles were identified and were associated either with a moderately altered receptivity profile for the majority of the patients or a strongly altered profile for a sub-category of patients. The receptive endometrium transcription profile under COS was defective for biological functions such as TGFβ signaling, leukocyte transendothelial migration and the cell cycle.

CONCLUSIONS: Gonadotrophin treatments in COS cycles led to disruptions of the transcriptional activation of genes involved in normal endometrial receptivity. We propose that when the receptiveness of the endometrium is seriously compromised by the COS protocol, fresh embryo replacement should be cancelled, the embryo frozen and thawed embryo replacement should be performed under natural cycles.

Key words: human endometrium/microarray/endometrial receptivity/natural cycle/COS

Submitted on December 15, 2008; resubmitted on January 21, 2009; accepted on January 29, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.