Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on April 9, 2009
Human Reproduction 2009 24(7):1612-1618; doi:10.1093/humrep/dep064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/7/1612    most recent
dep064v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meng, C.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, L.-N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meng, C.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, L.-N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Emergency contraceptive use among 5677 women seeking abortion in Shanghai, China

C.-X. Meng1,2, K. Gemzell-Danielsson2,{dagger}, O. Stephansson2,3, J.-Z. Kang4, Q.-F. Chen1 and L.-N. Cheng1,4,5,{dagger}

1 International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital/School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200030 Shanghai, People’s Republic of China 2 Department of Woman and Child Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden 3 Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Shanghai Institute of Family Planning Technical Instruction, 200030 Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

5 Correspondence address: Centre for Clinical Research and Training, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, 2140 Xie Tu Road, 200032 Shanghai, People’s Republic of China. Tel: +86-21-64438803; Fax: +86-21-64046128; E-mail: linanc2{at}yahoo.com

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) does not seem to reduce the number of induced abortions as would be expected, indicating that women use ECPs might also be a strong factor affecting their final efficacy. The study aimed to understand the attitude towards, and use of, ECPs among women seeking an abortion.

METHODS: A cohort study was conducted via face-to-face questionnaire interview among women seeking abortion in Shanghai, China. Logistic regression analysis and {chi}2 test were performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: The response rate was 99.3%. Among all 5677 respondents aged 15–48 years, 48.8% were ECP ever-users. Compared with ever-users, ECP never-users were less likely to have used contraception during the present cycle of conception (P < 0.001). In response to the question on the main reason for non-use of contraception, ECP never-users were less likely to realize the risk of pregnancy and had less contraceptive knowledge (P < 0.001). Among 2773 ECP ever-users, 72.7% did not use ECPs to prevent the current pregnancy, mainly due to lack of awareness of pregnancy risk. Out of 757 women, 437 (57.7%) repeated unprotected sex after taking ECPs during the current pregnant cycle. A pharmacy was the preferred source to access ECPs, for the reason of convenience.

CONCLUSIONS: Non-use of ECPs was correlated to less knowledge on fertility and a lower rate of contraceptive use among abortion-seeking women. Women of reproductive age should have access to ECPs and receive sufficient information on their use. Health care providers and pharmacists should also be trained in contraceptive counselling, including ECPs.

Key words: contraception/emergency contraceptive pills/fertility awareness/induced abortion


{dagger} These authors contributed equally.

Submitted on November 18, 2008; resubmitted on February 11, 2009; accepted on February 13, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.