Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on April 9, 2009
Human Reproduction 2009 24(7):1626-1631; doi:10.1093/humrep/dep077
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/7/1626    most recent
dep077v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Hum. Reprod.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boivin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boivin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Use of complementary and alternative medicines associated with a 30% lower ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate during 12 months of fertility treatment

J. Boivin1,3 and L. Schmidt2

1 School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, Wales CF10 3AT, UK 2 Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 5 Oester Farimagsgade, PO Box 2099, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark

3 Correspondence address. Fax: +45-442920874858; E-mail: boivin{at}cardiff.ac.uk)

BACKGROUND: There seems to be little discussion between patient and physician about the use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs), perhaps because they are not perceived to have adverse effects on fertility. We therefore compared ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate in spontaneous users and non-users of CAM during a 12-month period of assisted reproduction technique (ART) treatment. Consent was by questionnaire return.

METHOD: This was a prospective observational cohort study with a 12-month follow-up period, sampling consecutive patients attending five ART clinics in Denmark. N = 728 women about to have ART for the first time completed self-report assessments prior to treatment (Time 1, T1) and at 12-month follow-up (Time 2, T2). Data from treatment records were also available for n = 590.

RESULTS: About 30.6% (n = 223) of women used CAMs during the observation period. At T2 the ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate was 31.3% lower in CAM users (42.2%) compared with non-users (61.4%). Adjusted odds of pregnancy/live birth remained lower in CAM users versus non-users, odds ratio = 0.467 (95% confidence interval 0.306–0.711) after controlling for prognostic indicators (age, parity, years infertile).

CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent use of CAM during treatment with ART was associated with a 30% lower pregnancy rate that could not be explained by poor prognosis or life style factors. The mechanisms that could account for this association were discussed. Concurrent CAM use should be monitored during ART. A main limitation was that we could not ascertain which type of CAM was most associated with lower pregnancy rates.

Key words: complementary and alternative medicine/IVF/pregnancy/psychology/poor prognosis

Submitted on January 22, 2009; resubmitted on March 6, 2009; accepted on March 11, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Hum. Reprod.:

Editor's Choice
André Van Steirteghem
Hum. Reprod. 2009 24: 1531. [Extract] [Full Text]  



eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Response to Boivin & Schmidt
Jon L Wardle
Human Reproduction, 15 Apr 2009 [Full text]
Inadequate and Unsubstantiated Evidence
Aviv Messinger, et al.
Human Reproduction, 5 Nov 2009 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.