Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, D.W.
Right arrow Articles by Masson, G.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, D.W.
Right arrow Articles by Masson, G.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 934-938, 1991
© 1991 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


other

Biochemical monitoring during hormone replacement therapy cycles for transfer of cryopreserved embryos in patients with functional ovaries

D.W. Davies1, J.M. Jenkins, F.W. Anthony, S.C. Gadd, R.H. Watson, L.R. Sakhrani and G.M. Masson

Department of Human Reproduction and Obstetrics, University of Southampton, Princess Anne and BUPA Chalybeate Hospitals Southampton SO9 4HA. UK

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

Biochemical monitoring was undertaken in 22 treatment cycles for women with normal ovarian function who under went pituitary suppression with buserelin and administration of exogenous oestradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) for cryopreserved embryo transfer (ET). Eighteen transfers of 1–4 thawed embryos, on the third day of exposure to progesterone, resulted in five clinical pregnancies (27.8%) and one biochemical pregnancy. There was no difference between pregnant and non-pregnant patients in the number and quality of embryos transferred, age, weight or infertility diagnosis. Serum E2 level from days 10–17 (the late proliferative phase) of the therapy cycle were significantly higher in the pregnant group compared with the non-pregnant group (P < 0.05-P < 0.005). There were no significant differences in P levels between the two groups from the onset of progesterone administration to the end of the cycle. However, as might be expected, the mean E2/P molar ratio in the pregnant group was significantly higher at the time of ET (P < 0.02). It is conduded that biochemical monitoring during the embryo replacement cycle is necessary to tailor drug dosages for individual requirements to achieve adequate E levels before ET. Alternative routes of oestradiol administration need to be considered in patients with poor E2 profiles.

Key words: embryo transfer/hormone replacement therapy/oestradiol/oestrone/progesterone


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.