Human Reproduction, Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 983-986, 1991
© 1991 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
other |
Sperm morphological assessment based on strict criteria and in-vitro fertilization outcome
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Keio University 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160, Japan 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ogikubo Hospital Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed
One-hundred-and-twenty-three in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles were analysed in order to clarify the influence of strictly normal morphology (SNM) of spermatozoa on IVF outcome. SNM was defined using strict criteria according to Kruger with our modifications. The IVF cycles studied were divided into three groups: %SNM <12% (13 cycles), 12 <40% (68 cycles),
40% (42 cycles). The cleavage rates per oocyte were higher in the groups with 1240% and
40% of %SNM than in the group with %SNM <12%. The embryo transfer rate per cycle increased with increasing %SNM. The overall pregnancy rate per cycle increased with increasing %SNM (7.7% in %SNM < 12%, 22.1% in 1240% of %SNM, and 40.5% in %SNM
40%). The ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle also increased with increasing %SNM (7.7% in %SNM <12%, 14.7% in 1240% of %SNM, and 31.0% in %SNM
40%). The miscarriage rate was lower in %SNM
40% (23.5%) than in 1240% of %SNM (33.3%). It was suggested that %SNM is a good predictor of IVF outcome.
Key words: sperm morphology/fertilization in vitro/human/pregnancy/miscarriage
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D.R. Franken, M. Smith, R. Menkveld, T.F. Kruger, C. Sekadde-Kigondu, M. Mbizvo, and E.O. Akande The development of a continuous quality control programme for strict sperm morphology among sub-Saharan African laboratories Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 667 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Barroso, R. Mercan, K. Ozgur, M. Morshedi, P. Kolm, K. Coetzee, T. Kruger, and S. Oehninger Intra- and inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of sperm morphology by strict criteria: impact of semen preparation, staining techniques and manual versus computerized analysis Hum. Reprod., August 1, 1999; 14(8): 2036 - 2040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
