Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, W.C.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, M.G.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ford, W.C.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, M.G.R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 654-659, 1992
© 1992 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

other

The yield, motility and performance in the hamster egg test of human spermatozoa prepared from cryopreserved semen by four different methods

W.C.L. Ford1, E.A. McLaughlin, S.M. Prior, J.M. Rees, P.G. Wardle and M.G.R. Hull

University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michael's Hospital Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EG, UK

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

Different procedures were investigated for the dilution of human cryopreserved semen and the preparation of an enriched population of motile spermatozoa for assisted reproduction. The dilution of a 0.25 ml straw of cryopreserved human semen by addition of 2.0 ml Ham's F-10 buffer in one step caused a large decrease in the proportion of motile spermatozoa. This was due to osmotic stress because many of the diluted spermatozoa exhibited swollen tails. To a large extent the damage could be avoided by adding the buffer in 0.10-ml aliquots at 30-s intervals. Spermatozoa obtained after such dilution of cryopreserved human semen were subjected to the swim-up procedure, to centrifugation on two-step gradients of Nycodenz or Percoll, or to filtration through glass fibre paper and compared with respect to yield, motility parameters and penetrating ability in the hamster egg test. The swim-up procedure yielded spermatozoa with excellent motility but only 12% of the available motile spermatozoa were recovered. On both Nycodenz and Percoll gradients, > 40% of the available motile spermatozoa were recovered and the average velocity of the spermatozoa was not significantly less than for the swim-up technique. When A23187 was used to promote acrosome reactions in the hamster egg test, Percoll-prepared spermatozoa achieved an average of 8.6 decondensed sperm heads/egg compared to 1.9 for Nycodenz and 1.3 for the swim-up procedure. The yield from glass fibre paper filtration was only 12% and the velocity of the spermatozoa and their performance in the hamster egg test was significantly poorer than in all the other methods. We conclude that cryopreserved semen must be diluted with great care and that centrifugation on two-step Percoll gradients is an effective method to separate fertile spermatozoa from this semen for use in clinically assisted reproduction.

Key words: human spermatozoa/cryopreservation/separation techniques


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
A.C. Williams and W.C.L. Ford
Functional Significance of the Pentose Phosphate Pathway and Glutathione Reductase in the Antioxidant Defenses of Human Sperm
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1309 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. C. Richer and W.C.L. Ford
A critical investigation of NADPH oxidase activity in human spermatozoa
Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 7(3): 237 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.