Human Reproduction, Vol. 7, No. 8, pp. 1136-1140, 1992
© 1992 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
other |
Male factor as determinant of in-vitro fertilization outcome
1Departments of Molecular Cell Biology/Genetics, University of Limburg (3X-Gebouw) 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands 2Obstetrics/ Gynaecology, University of Limburg (3X-Gebouw) 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
Correspondence: 3To whom correspondence should be addressed
The effect of different semen parameters was evaluated in 200 consecutive couples in an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programme. All semen analyses were performed on the native aliquot of semen which was subsequently prepared and used for in-vitro insemination. Morphology evaluation using strict criteria (kappa 0.46 and r = 0.565) was compared with progressive motile sperm density (kappa 0.37 and r = 0.333) and the conventional World Health Organisation (WHO) evaluation of morphology (kappa 0.31 and r = 0.378). Results show that morphology evaluation using strict criteria is the best predictor of IVF and density of progressively motile spermatozoa can be an optional method. The combined results of strict morphology and motile concentration progressively showed that if both parameters were below the cut-off points of 5% and 3 x 106/ml respectively, the fertilization rate per oocyte was very low (18%). No pregnancies were achieved in this group. When both parameters were above the cut-off points, the fertilization rate per oocyte was high (72%) (P < 0.005) and the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 27%. Predictive values indicate that morphology evaluation using strict criteria and the number of progressive motile spermatozoa can be used as patient selection criteria for infertility clinics.
Key words: infertility/IVF/male/sperm morphology
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.M.E. van Rumste, J.E. den Hartog, J.C.M. Dumoulin, J.L.H. Evers, and J.A. Land Is controlled ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination an acceptable therapy in couples with unexplained non-conception in the perspective of multiple pregnancies? Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 701 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C.M. Dumoulin, J. G. Derhaag, M. Bras, A. P.A. Van Montfoort, A. D.M. Kester, J. L.H. Evers, J. P.M. Geraedts, and E. Coonen Growth rate of human preimplantation embryos is sex dependent after ICSI but not after IVF Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 484 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Dallinga, E. J.C. Moonen, J. C.M. Dumoulin, J. L.H. Evers, J. P.M. Geraedts, and J. C.S. Kleinjans Decreased human semen quality and organochlorine compounds in blood Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1973 - 1979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Miller and T. T. Smith The effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and semen parameters on blastocyst development in vitro Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 918 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C.M. Dumoulin, E. Coonen, M. Bras, J.M. Bergers-Janssen, R. C.M. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, L. C.P. van Wissen, J. P.M. Geraedts, and J. L.H. Evers Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 306 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C.M. Dumoulin, E. Coonen, M. Bras, L. C.P. van Wissen, R. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, J.M. Bergers-Jansen, J. G. Derhaag, J. P.M. Geraedts, and J. L.H. Evers Comparison of in-vitro development of embryos originating from either conventional in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 402 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C.M. Dumoulin, C. J.J. Meijers, M. Bras, E. Coonen, J. P.M. Geraedts, and J. L.H. Evers Effect of oxygen concentration on human in-vitro fertilization and embryo culture Hum. Reprod., February 1, 1999; 14(2): 465 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
