Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, D.P.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, D.P.L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 91-96, 1993
© 1993 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

review-article

REVIEW: Mammalian fertilization as a biological machine: a working model for adhesion and fusion of sperm and oocyte

D.P.L. Green

Department of Pharmacology, University of Otago Medical School P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand

This review argues that the phenomena of sperm adhesion to the mammalian oocyte and their subsequent fusion can be better understood in the light of recent developments in cell biology. Cell–cell adhesion is mediated, in general terms, by adhesion molecules and their counter-receptors on adhering membranes, and membrane fusion by fusion molecules. The application of these ideas to mammalian fertilization is examined in detail. It is argued that the adhesion of sperm and oocyte is a complex problem which involves not only mutual recognition, but possibly early reorganization of the oocyte cytoskeleton. Mechanisms for activating cytoskeletal reorganization in the oocyte are identified. The site of fusion on the sperm head is discussed, together with the evidence that PH-30 is the fusion protein. It is suggested that current evidence supports the view that PH-30 is an adhesion molecule which is potentially capable of contributing to the reorganization of the oocyte cytoskeleton at the site of sperm attachment, but that PH-30 may not be the fusion molecule. It is argued that an appropriate conceptual framework in which to view sperm-oocyte adhesion and fusion is that of a biological machine into which the role of individual molecular components can be fitted as they become identified. It is hoped that this framework, together with verifiable ideas taken from other areas of cell biology, may facilitate an understanding of this key area of fertilization.

Key words: biological model/cell–cell adhesion/cytoskeleton/fertilization/sperm–oocyte interaction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
C.-Y. Fong and A. Bongso
Comparison of human blastulation rates and total cell number in sequential culture media with and without co-culture
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 14(3): 774 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.