Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Shawaf, T.
Right arrow Articles by Craft, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Shawaf, T.
Right arrow Articles by Craft, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 8, No. 12, pp. 2068-2074, 1993
© 1993 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


review-article

Infertility: Ultrasonic monitoring during replacement of frozen/thawed embryos in natural and hormone replacement cycles

Talha Al-Shawaf1, Dunsong Yang, Yaqub Al-Magid, Angela Seaton, Faye Iketubosin and Ian Craft

The London Fertility Centre Cozens House, London W1F 1AX, UK

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

We evaluated the results of cryopreserved/thawed embryo replacement (FER) to determine if the outcome following transfer in a natural cycle in a defined group was different to that from a hormone replacement cycle, and also to assess vaginal ultrasonographic features that assist in predicting the timing of the transfer. At the London Fertility Centre, 149 consecutive FER cycles were studied retrospectively. Women with proven ovulation and regular cycles were included during natural cycles (n = 77). The hormone replacement cycle group included women with anovulation, irregular cycles and older women (n = 72). In the natural cycle group, transfer was performed following positive urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and confirmation of ovulation by ultrasonography. With the hormone replacement therapy group, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue was used to induce pituitary down-regulation, oestradiol valerate was supplemented followed by regular ultrasound monitoring, and FER 2 days following the initiation of progesterone, which was started once adequate endometrial development was noticed on ultrasonography. The pregnancy and ongoing/delivery rates were analysed in relation to the treatment cycle, age, number and quality of embryos transferred. Ultrasonographic features were examined to evaluate their relationship with the outcome of treatment. The results showed that no difference existed between natural and hormone replacement cycles in pregnancy rates per cycle (26 and 25%), ongoing/delivery rate (20.8% in both groups), and implantation rate (10.3 and 10.6%). Pregnancy rates were not influenced by the number of embryos transferred, stage at which the embryos were cryopreserved, or whether they were extra embryos from in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer, or gamete intra-Fallopian transfer. The pregnancy rate was low (7.4%) if the embryos had less than three blastomeres and if the fragmentation was >50% (0% pregnancy rate). With hormone replacement cycles, age did not influence the outcome, and women 40 years and older had a pregnancy rate of 29.4% per cycle. No pregnancies resulted in the natural cycle group if the maximum follicular diameter was > 22 mm before ovulation. When poor endometrial development was noted (thickness < 8 mm and grade C) no pregnancy resulted from FER in natural or hormone replacement cycles. The pregnancy rates were higher when the endometrium was ≥8 mm thickness and grade B (42.4%) or grade A (21.2%). We concluded that FER outcomes in natural cycles were similar to those arising with hormone replacement therapy provided good selection criteria were used, and vaginal ultrasonography can assist in timing the day of replacement and identify cases to be cancelled before the transfer.

Key words: frozen embryo replacement/hormone replacement cycle/natural cycle/ultrasonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Veleva, A. Tiitinen, S. Vilska, C. Hyden-Granskog, C. Tomas, H. Martikainen, and J. S. Tapanainen
High and low BMI increase the risk of miscarriage after IVF/ICSI and FET
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 878 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. H. Y. Ng, C. C. W. Chan, O. S. Tang, W. S. B. Yeung, and P. C. Ho
The role of endometrial and subendometrial vascularity measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1612 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. H. Y. Ng, C. C. W. Chan, O. S. Tang, W. S. B. Yeung, and P. C. Ho
Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound between stimulated and natural cycles in the same patients
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2385 - 2390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M. Sonmezer and K. Oktay
Fertility preservation in female patients
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2004; 10(3): 251 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. El-Toukhy, A. Taylor, Y. Khalaf, K. Al-Darazi, P. Rowell, P. Seed, and P. Braude
Pituitary suppression in ultrasound-monitored frozen embryo replacement cycles. A randomised study
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 874 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.X. Wang, Y.Y. Yap, and C.D. Matthews
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: influence of clinical factors on implantation rate and risk of multiple conception
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2316 - 2319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.