Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sakkas, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sakkas, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 8, No. 12, pp. 2167-2173, 1993
© 1993 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


review-article

Fertilization and early embryology: Evidence of sperm entry into assumed unfertilized human oocytes after sub-zonal sperm microinjection

F. Urner, P.G. Bianchi, A. Campana and D. Sakkas1

Clinique de Stérilité et d'Endocrinologie Gynécologique, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire de Genève 32 Bd de la Cluse, 1211 Genève 14, Switzerland

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

Sub-zonal sperm microinjection (SUZI) as a treatment for male factor infertility can facilitate fertilization, however, in many cases oocytes remain unfertilized even though the sperm is placed in close contact with the oolemma. In order to improve our understanding of gamete interaction in cases of failed fertilization, we have analysed the failed fertilized oocytes from both SUZI and conventional in-vitro fertilization. The fluorochrome Hoechst 33342 (which binds specifically to DNA) was used to check for the possible presence of paternal chromatin in the unfertilized oocytes. A significantly higher (P < 0.01) number of microinjected oocytes showed signs of fertilization 2–3 days after sperm microinjection compared to normally inseminated oocytes, 30/175 (17.1%) and 2/79 (2.5%) respectively. In addition, four out of eight couples returning for a second treatment by SUZI displayed anomalies in fertilization in both cycles. The semen characteristics of patients with or without anomalies in fertilization was not different. The irregularities observed in the fertilization process infer that certain male factor patients have intrinsic sperm anomalies lying at the sperm membrane and/or chromatin level that could lead to anomalies in the appearance of the pronuclei.

Key words: chromatin/fertilization/male infertility/micromanipulation/pronuclear formation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Neuber and R.D. Powers
Is the mouse a clinically relevant model for human fertilization failures?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 171 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
F. Urner and D. Sakkas
Characterization of Glycolysis and Pentose Phosphate Pathway Activity during Sperm Entry into the Mouse Oocyte
Biol Reprod, April 1, 1999; 60(4): 973 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
F. Urner and D. Sakkas
A Possible Role for the Pentose Phosphate Pathway of Spermatozoa inGamete Fusion in the Mouse
Biol Reprod, March 1, 1999; 60(3): 733 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.