Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowlands, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, M. G.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rowlands, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, M. G.R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 9, No. 12, pp. 2287-2290, 1994
© 1994 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

research-article

Infertility: The prognosis for assisted conception treatment after unexpected failure of fertilization in vitro: a comparative study

David J. Rowlands, Alan McDermott and Michael G.R. Hull1

University of Bristol Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michael‘s Hospital Bristol BS2 8EG, UK

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

The relative prognosis for further assisted conception treatment (without micro-injection) after initial unexpected failure of fertilization in apparently favourable couples undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment was assessed. After their first cycle of treatment, 481 consecutive couples were grouped according to their fertilization (including cleavage) rate per oocyte into five bands. Proportions of couples proceeding to further cycles of treatment by IVF or gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) and resulting fertilization and pregnancy rates were compared. Pregnancy rates in the first cycle of treatment were significantly related to fertilization rate. The fertilization rate was zero in 13 couples (3%) and only 1–24% in 18 (4%). There were no significant differences between these groups in the proportions proceeding to further treatment (31, 50%) compared with others (overall 37%, including some treated by GIFT), or in their median fertilization rates (75, 60% compared with 67% – IVF cycles only), pregnancy rates (20, 38% of cycles compared with 37% – IVF or GIFT) or birth rates (20, 38% of cycles compared with 31% – IVF or GIFT). Amongst couples whose initial fertilization rate was ≥ 50% there was no fertilization in 4% of subsequent IVF cycles. We conclude that in couples with well defined favourable conditions, including tests of sperm function for assisted conception treatment, who have unexpected failure of fertilization, the prognosis for further treatment remains favourable without resort to more complex investigations or micro-injection methods. Such failure occurs infrequently and generally as a random event, and should have no appreciable effect on life-table calculation of cumulative pregnancy and birth rates in this group of patients.

Key words: failure of fertilization/in-vitro fertilization/normal sperm function/prognosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Diagnosis and management of the infertile couple: missing information
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 295 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.