Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payne, D.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Payne, D.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, C. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 9, No. 7, pp. 1281-1288, 1994
© 1994 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Andrology: The influence of sperm morphology and the acrosome reaction on fertilization outcome after sub-zonal injection (SZI) of human spermatozoa

Dianna Payne1, Sean P. Flaherty, Cavan D. Newble, Nicholas J. Swann, Xin-Jun Wang and Colin D. Matthews

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woodville, South Australia 5011

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

The usefulness of sub-zonal injection (SZI) for the treatment of severe male factor infertility has been restricted by low and unpredictable fertilization rates and the high risk of polyspermy after the injection of multiple spermatozoa. In this prospective study, we have evaluated whether sperm morphology and the percentage of acrosome-reacted spermatozoa at the time of injection can be used to predict SZI fertilization outcomes. Populations of motile spermatozoa equivalent to those injected were collected from the medium/oil interface immediately after SZI of each cohort of oocytes. Morphology was assessed using the World Health Organization 1987 criteria and the acrosomal status of spermatozoa was determined after staining with rhodamine-conjugated Pisum sativum agglutinin. A fertilization index (FI) was calculated to express the actual fertilizing potential of the spermatozoa injected. In all, 67 patients underwent 72 SZI cycles. The overall fertilization and polyspermy rates were 36 and 47% respectively, and a clinical pregnancy rate per transfer of 22% was achieved. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between morphology and the FI (r = 0.506, P < 0.0001). Patients with <10% normal morphology always had a FI < 10%, and this was reflected by low fertilization and polyspermy rates and the high number (32%) of cycles with complete failure of fertilization in this group. In patients with > 10% normal morphology, there were two patterns: low (≤10% FI) or high (>10% FI) fertility. This was evident in the fertilization (23 and 85%, respectively) and polyspermy (25 and 68%, respectively) rates of these two patient sub-groups. While the percentage of acrosome-reacted spermatozoa at the time of injection was weakly correlated with the FI (r = 0.292, P < 0.05), it could not be used to predict differences in fertilization potential between patient sub-groups. We conclude that sperm morphology and acrosomal status at the time of injection are of limited use in predicting SZI fertilization outcomes, although patients with poor morphology (≤ 10% normal) have lower fertilization and polyspermy rates.

Key words: acrosome reaction/fertilization/human spermatozoa/micro-injection/morphology/polyspermy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.