Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on June 11, 2007
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dem117
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/8/2084    most recent
dem117v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siristatidis, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siristatidis, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Unexplained infertility: does it really exist? Does it matter?

Charalambos Siristatidis1 and Siladitya Bhattacharya

Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Foresterhill, AB252ZL Aberdeen, UK

1 Correspondence address. Tel: +30-693-2294994; Fax: +01-224-553582; E-mail: harrysiri{at}hotmail.com

Unexplained infertility (UI) refers to a diagnosis made in couples in whom standard investigations including semen analysis, tests of ovulation and tubal patency are normal. It has been suggested that the term UI is unsustainable, as conditions such as endometriosis, tubal infertility, premature ovarian ageing and immunological infertility tend to be misdiagnosed as UI. In this debate, we present the view that, although scientifically unsatisfying, the diagnosis of UI is sustainable from a clinical and practical perspective. Given our present treatment options, further investigations leading to a more ‘accurate’ diagnosis is unlikely to change our management in these cases. Scientific curiosity must take second place to a more pragmatic approach, which takes into account the clinical and financial costs of making a more ‘accurate’ diagnosis.

Key words: endometriosis/immunological infertility/ovarian ageing/tubal infertility/unexplained infertility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Golubovsky
Unexplained infertility in Charles Darwin's family: genetic aspect
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1237 - 1238.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.