Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on August 29, 2007
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dem237
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/10/2585    most recent
dem237v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 13: the welfare of the child in medically assisted reproduction

ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law including, G. Pennings1, G. de Wert, F. Shenfield, J. Cohen, B. Tarlatzis and P. Devroey

Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

1 Correspondence address. Tel/fax: +32-16-620767; E-mail: guido.pennings{at}ugent.be

The analysis of the welfare of the child in the context of medically assisted reproduction is divided in two parts: the first part addresses the risks associated with the would-be parent(s), the second part focuses on possible risks inherent in the technologies and treatments themselves. The risk factors connected with the intended parents may be medical and psychosocial. Two important considerations are raised here: the necessity to avoid discrimination and respect for the privacy of the patients. The second part concerns the ethical questions involved in the rapid dissemination of new technologies in assisted conception. Technology and research must always be subordinate to the welfare of the future offspring. The different steps involved in the responsible application of medical technologies to treat infertility are analysed.

Key words: child/experiments/research ethics/responsibility/welfare


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A.L. Bredenoord, G. Pennings, and G. de Wert
Ooplasmic and nuclear transfer to prevent mitochondrial DNA disorders: conceptual and normative issues
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 4, 2008; (2008) dmn035v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K.J. Middelburg, M.J. Heineman, A.F. Bos, and M. Hadders-Algra
Neuromotor, cognitive, language and behavioural outcome in children born following IVF or ICSI-a systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2008; 14(3): 219 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
D. J. Amor and C. Cameron
PGD gender selection for non-Mendelian disorders with unequal sex incidence
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 729 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.