Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on February 8, 2008

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/den008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/4/885    most recent
den008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Custers, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mol, B. W.J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Custers, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mol, B. W.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Intrauterine insemination: how many cycles should we perform?{dagger}

Inge M. Custers1,7, Pieternel Steures1, Peter Hompes2, Paul Flierman3, Yvonne van Kasteren4, Peter A. van Dop5, Fulco van der Veen1 and Ben W.J. Mol1,6

1 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, Room H4-213, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands 6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands

7 Correspondence address. Tel: +31-20-5663857; Fax: +31-20-6963489; E-mail: i.m.custers{at}amc.uva.nl

BACKGROUND: In the past 20 years, various recommendations have been made about the maximum number of intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles that should be performed, because evidence underpinning a possible limit is lacking.

METHODS: We performed a multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis among couples treated with IUI up to nine cycles. Primary outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) per cycle. Cumulative OPRs (COPR) after three, six and nine cycles of IUI were calculated using life-table analysis. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables possibly affecting OPR's.

RESULTS: Overall, 3714 couples with male, cervical or unexplained subfertility underwent 15 303 cycles of IUI. In 70% of cycles, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) was used (51% clomiphene-citrate, 19% gonadotropins). Mean OPR rate was 5.6% per cycle. OPR in the seventh, eighth and ninth cycle were 5.1%, 6.7% and 4.6%, respectively. Taking censored patients into account, the calculated COPR was 18% after the third cycle, 30% after the seventh cycle and 41% after the ninth cycle. If censored patients were considered to have no chance of conception, a crude COPR of 25% after nine cycles was found. Multivariable regression analysis showed no significant impact of age, type of subfertility, diagnosis, use of hyperstimulation or cycle number on OPR after the sixth treatment cycle.

CONCLUSIONS: OPR in high-order IUI cycles are acceptable, and do not offer a rationale for cancellation before nine cycles. Using this type of very mild COH, it may be reasonable to conduct up to nine cycles.

Key words: intrauterine insemination/controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/subfertility/pregnancy rate/cumulative pregnancy rate


{dagger} Presented as an oral presentation at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, ESHRE 2007, Lyon, France.

Submitted on August 29, 2007; resubmitted on December 19, 2007; accepted on January 9, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.