Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on July 14, 2008

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/den254
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/10/2227    most recent
den254v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belva, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bonduelle, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belva, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bonduelle, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles

F. Belva1,4, S. Henriet2, E. Van den Abbeel2, M. Camus2, P. Devroey2, J. Van der Elst2, I. Liebaers1, P. Haentjens3 and M. Bonduelle1

1 Medical Genetics, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium 2 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium 3 Centre for Outcomes Research and Laboratory For Experimental Surgery, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

4 Correspondence address. Tel: +32-2-4776866; Fax: +32-2-4776860; E-mail: florence.belva{at}az.vub.ac.be

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety of cryopreservation in combination with IVF and ICSI, prenatal diagnosis and neonatal outcome were investigated in children conceived from frozen-thawed ICSI embryos (cryo ICSI) and frozen-thawed IVF embryos (cryo IVF). Data were also compared with earlier published results from fresh ICSI and IVF embryos.

METHODS: Questionnaire data and results of physical examination at 2 months of 547 cryo ICSI children and 390 cryo IVF children were compared, and these were also compared with those of infants born after transfer of fresh embryos.

RESULTS: Birth characteristics were comparable for cryo ICSI and cryo IVF infants. Cryo singletons showed a trend towards higher mean birthweight compared with fresh singletons, in ICSI and IVF, reaching significance when all cryo (ICSI plus IVF) singletons were considered. Low birthweight rate according to multiplicity was comparable between the fresh and the cryo groups, in ICSI and IVF. Non-statistically significantly increased rates of de novo chromosomal anomalies (3.2%) were found in cryo ICSI fetuses/children compared with the fresh ICSI group (1.7%) (OR 1.96; 95% CI 0.92–4.14). Major malformations were more frequently observed in cryo ICSI live borns (6.4%) than in cryo IVF live borns (3.1%) (OR 2.15; 95% CI 1.10–4.20) and fresh ICSI live borns (3.4%) (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.31–2.91).

CONCLUSIONS: In cryo ICSI compared with cryo IVF, prenatal and neonatal outcome results were comparable, except for a higher major malformation rate in the cryo ICSI group. In the total cryo group compared with the total fresh group, we found a higher mean birthweight in singletons and a higher major malformation rate in live borns.

Key words: cryopreservation/ICSI/IVF/outcome/children

Submitted on January 28, 2008; resubmitted on June 6, 2008; accepted on June 11, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. L. Halliday, O. C. Ukoumunne, H.W. G. Baker, S. Breheny, A. M. Jaques, C. Garrett, D. Healy, and D. Amor
Increased risk of blastogenesis birth defects, arising in the first 4 weeks of pregnancy, after assisted reproductive technologies
Hum. Reprod., October 22, 2009; (2009) dep364v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U.-B. Wennerholm, V. Soderstrom-Anttila, C. Bergh, K. Aittomaki, J. Hazekamp, K.-G. Nygren, A. Selbing, and A. Loft
Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2158 - 2172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
G.H. Woldringh, D.E. Besselink, A.H.J. Tillema, J.C.M. Hendriks, and J.A.M. Kremer
Karyotyping, congenital anomalies and follow-up of children after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with non-ejaculated sperm: a systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, August 21, 2009; (2009) dmp030v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.J. Amor, J.X. Xu, J.L. Halliday, I. Francis, D.L. Healy, S. Breheny, H.W.G. Baker, and A.M. Jaques
Pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have low levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) leading to a high rate of false-positive results in first trimester screening for Down syndrome
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1330 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.