Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on September 1, 2008
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/den329
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/12/2731    most recent
den329v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalfoglou, A.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalfoglou, A.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Attitudes about preconception sex selection: a focus group study with Americans

A.L. Kalfoglou1,3, J. Scott2 and K. Hudson2

1 Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle PUP 212, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA 2 Genetics and Public Policy Center, Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, 1717 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 530, Washington DC 20036, USA

3Correspondence address. Tel: +1-410-455-2061; E-mail: akalfogl{at}umbc.edu

BACKGROUND: MicroSort, a sperm-sorting technology for sex selection, may eventually be approved by the Food and Drug Administration and marketed to the public. Data on US public attitudes about the morally appropriate uses and regulation of this technology are lacking.

METHODS: We conducted 20 focus groups in April 2003 with participants from five major US cities to identify the values that shape Americans’ attitudes about the use and regulation of preconception sex selection (PSS) technology. One hundred and seventy-six individuals between the ages of 18 and 68 were assigned to groups ranging from 6 to 11 participants based on their location, sex, race/ethnicity, religion, age, education and parental status. Qualitative analysis of focus group transcripts was conducted using NVivo 2.0 software to determine beliefs and values that shape participants’ opinions about the appropriate use and regulation of PSS.

RESULTS: Most participants strongly favor using PSS to avoid X-linked genetic diseases. Although some participants were uncomfortable with the use of PSS for non-medical sex selection, believing it to be ‘selfish’ and inconsistent with parental love, they did not perceive the potential harms to be significant enough to warrant governmental intrusion into reproductive decisions.

CONCLUSIONS: PSS should face little public opposition in the US if widely marketed.

Key words: sperm sorting/MicroSort/public opinion/attitudes/qualitative research

Submitted on December 12, 2007; resubmitted on August 1, 2008; accepted on August 5, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.