Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on December 9, 2008

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/den407
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/3/649    most recent
den407v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, Q.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Assessment of the developmental competence of human somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos by oocyte morphology classification

Yang Yu1,2,{dagger}, Qingyun Mai3,{dagger}, Xinjie Chen1,2,{dagger}, Liu Wang1, Ling Gao3, Canquan Zhou3,4 and Qi Zhou1,4

1 State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, People's Republic of China 2 Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China 3 Reproductive Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of SUN YAT-SEN University, Zhongshan Er Road 58, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, People's Republic of China

4 Correspondence address. Tel:/Fax: +86-10-64807299; E-mail: qzhou{at}ioz.ac.cn (Q.Z.), Tel:/Fax: +86-20-87786029; E-mail: zhoucanquan{at}hotmail.com (C.Z.)

BACKGROUND: The oocyte plays a key role in reprogramming the epigenetic status of donor cell nuclei, and the absence of reprogramming elements in the cytoplasm or aberrant accumulation of proteins can trigger the abnormal development of nuclear transfer (NT) embryos. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between oocyte morphology and both embryo development and pregnancy outcome. In the present study, we compared the morphology of oocytes with subsequent development of human somatic cell NT (SCNT) embryos.

METHODS: Piezo-assisted SCNT technology was used to produce reconstructed embryos, with almost 92% of oocytes reconstructed successfully. Depending on their morphologies, we separated metaphase II oocytes into four grades according to criteria which assess oocyte morphology, first polar body and perivitelline space, and especially, cytoplasm granula distribution.

RESULTS: Embryos from oocytes of Grades A and B could develop to the blastocyst stage with similar development efficiency for every developmental stage. However, embryos from Grade C oocytes arrested at or before the 8-cell stage then degraded, and the donor cell genome could not be activated and reprogrammed in such oocytes. For Grade D oocytes, cleavage was not observed in the reconstructed embryos, suggesting that the oocytes themselves have no developmental potential.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that different levels of developmental competence of SCNT embryos resulting from different oocyte reprogramming potentials associated with different morphologies. The results suggest that effective methods for improving oocyte quality should be studied, and that human SCNT efficiency would be increased following simple assessment of established oocyte morphology criterion.

Key words: human somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)/oocyte morphology/oocyte donation/blastocyst development


{dagger} These authors contributed equally to this work.

Submitted on June 24, 2008; resubmitted on October 7, 2008; accepted on October 9, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.