Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on June 30, 2009

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dep172
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/10/2642    most recent
dep172v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Toukhy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Braude, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Toukhy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Braude, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on Day 3

Tarek El-Toukhy1,3, Ahmed Kamal1, Eleanor Wharf1, Jan Grace1, Virginia Bolton1, Yacoub Khalaf1 and Peter Braude1,2

1 Assisted Conception Unit and PGD Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 11th Floor Tower Wing, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT, UK 2 Division of Reproduction and Endocrinology, King's College London, St Thomas Street, London, UK

3 Correspondence address. Tel: +44-207-188-0497; Fax: +44-207-188-0490; E-mail: tarek.el-toukhy{at}gstt.nhs.uk

BACKGROUND: An elective single-embryo transfer (SET) policy has not been applied to preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for inherited genetic disorders because of concerns regarding post-thaw survival of biopsied embryos. Our objective was to evaluate the survival and pregnancy potential of embryos biopsied for PGD at the cleavage stage and cryopreserved at the blastocyst stage and its contribution to the overall success of an elective SET policy in a PGD programme.

METHODS: From January 2006, all couples who had two or more transferable PGD blastocysts biopsied on Day 3 of culture were offered single-blastocyst transfer (SBT) and cryopreservation of surplus blastocyst(s) using a slow-freezing technique. We compared the outcome of 32 cryo-thawed PGD cycles with that of 191 cryo-thawed conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles performed between January 2006 and July 2008. We also compared the outcome of all fresh PGD cycles performed before and after January 2006.

RESULTS: The cryo-thawed blastocyst survival rate was similar between the PGD and IVF/ICSI groups (87% versus 88%, P = 0.94). There was no significant difference in the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups (35% versus 29%, P = 0.45 and 34% versus 36%, P = 0.77, respectively). During the same period, the multiple pregnancy rate in the fresh PGD programme dropped from 36% to 10% (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.08–0.48, P < 0.001) with no reduction in pregnancy rates.

CONCLUSIONS: The survival and implantation potential of biopsied PGD embryos cryopreserved at the blastocyst stage is comparable to that of non-biopsied IVF/ICSI cryopreserved blastocysts. Elective SBT and cryopreservation of surplus blastocysts for later use should extend to include PGD for inherited genetic disorders.

Key words: PGD/embryo biopsy/blastocyst transfer/cryopreservation/implantation

Submitted on January 1, 2009; resubmitted on April 8, 2009; accepted on April 14, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.