Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on August 27, 2009

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dep298
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liebaers, I.
Right arrow Articles by Bonduelle, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liebaers, I.
Right arrow Articles by Bonduelle, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Report on a consecutive series of 581 children born after blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis

I. Liebaers1,3,5, S. Desmyttere1, W. Verpoest2, M. De Rycke1, C. Staessen1, K. Sermon3, P. Devroey2, P. Haentjens4 and M. Bonduelle1,3

1 Centre for Medical Genetics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101 1090, Brussels, Belgium 2 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101 1090, Brussels, Belgium 3 Department of Embryology and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101 1090, Brussels, Belgium 4 Centre for Outcomes Research and Laboratory for Experimental Surgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101 1090, Brussels, Belgium

5 Correspondence address. E-mail: inge.liebaers{at}uzbrussel.be

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and subsequently preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) have been introduced since 1990. The difference from the already existing in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology, using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), was the embryo biopsy at day 3 after fertilization. Although healthy children post-PGD/PGS have been born, the question of whether embryo biopsy could have any harmful effects has to be studied on large series in a prospective manner.

METHODS: A prospective cohort study was undertaken from 1992 until 2005, using the same approach as for the follow-up of IVF and ICSI children conceived in the same centre. Questionnaires were sent to physicians and parents at conception and at delivery. Children were examined at 2 months of age by trained clinical geneticists whenever possible.

RESULTS: Data collected on 581 post-PGD/PGS children showed that term, birthweight and major malformation rates were not statistically different from that of 2889 ICSI children, with overall rates of major malformation among these post-PGD/PGS and ICSI children being 2.13 and 3.38%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 0.62; exact 95% confidence limits [95% CL]: 0.31–1.15). However, the overall perinatal death rate was significantly higher among post-PGD/PGS children compared with ICSI children (4.64 versus 1.87%; OR: 2.56; 95% CL: 1.54–4.18). When stratified for multiple births, perinatal death rates among PGD/PGS singleton and ICSI singleton children were similar (1.03 versus 1.30%; OR: 0.83; 95% CL: 0.28–2.44), but significantly more perinatal deaths were seen in post-PGD/PGS multiple pregnancies compared with ICSI multiple pregnancies (11.73 versus 2.54%; OR: 5.09; 95% CL: 2.80–9.90). The overall misdiagnosis rate was below 1%.

CONCLUSIONS: Embryo biopsy does not add risk factors to the health of singleton children born after PGD or PGS. The perinatal death rate in multiple pregnancies is such that both caution and long-term follow-up are required.

Key words: preimplantation genetic diagnosis/blastomere biopsy/child follow-up/major malformations/misdiagnosis

Submitted on April 10, 2009; resubmitted on July 23, 2009; accepted on July 24, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.