Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on August 21, 2009

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dep301
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/12/3205    most recent
dep301v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romundstad, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vatten, L. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romundstad, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vatten, L. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Assisted fertilization and breech delivery: risks and obstetric management

Liv Bente Romundstad1,2,5, Pål R. Romundstad2, Arne Sunde1, Vidar von Düring1, Rolv Skjærven3,4 and Lars J. Vatten2

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IVF Unit, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim NO-7006, Trondheim, Norway 2 Department of Public Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway 3 Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Bergen, Norway 4 Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

5 Correspondence address. Tel: +47 72593808; E-mail: libero{at}ntnu.no

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that assisted reproduction technology (ART) is associated with increased risk of breech presentation. We investigated whether factors that tend to differ between ART and spontaneously conceived pregnancies may explain the higher risk of breech deliveries associated with ART.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this population-based cohort study, we included 1 209 151 singleton pregnancies reported to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway between 1984 and 2006 and compared the risk of breech presentation in 8229 ART pregnancies with that in spontaneously conceived pregnancies. Risk ratios (RR), adjusted for maternal age, parity, gestational length and year of birth, were estimated using binominal regression, and we describe differences and time trends in obstetric management for breech and cephalic presentations after ART compared with management of spontaneously conceived pregnancies.

RESULTS: Breech presentation occurred nearly 50% more often in ART singleton pregnancies than in spontaneously conceived singletons [crude RR: 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34–1.64], but after adjustment for potentially confounding factors, the difference was fully attenuated (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88–1.07). The most important contributors to the attenuation were parity and length of gestation. In general, Caesarean sections and induced deliveries were more likely in ART pregnancies, but over the study period, the proportion of Caesarean sections in ART pregnancies gradually approached that of spontaneously conceived pregnancies.

CONCLUSION: Increased risk of breech presentation in pregnancies after ART is mediated by lower parity and shorter gestational length. In general, the obstetric management of women with ART pregnancies is gradually approaching the ordinary surveillance of pregnant women.

Key words: assisted reproduction technology/breech presentation/singletons/Caesarean section/population study

Submitted on May 14, 2009; resubmitted on July 9, 2009; accepted on July 10, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.