Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on September 2, 2009

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dep302
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/12/3033    most recent
dep302v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferrero, S.
Right arrow Articles by Remorgida, V.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferrero, S.
Right arrow Articles by Remorgida, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Letrozole combined with norethisterone acetate compared with norethisterone acetate alone in the treatment of pain symptoms caused by endometriosis

S. Ferrero1,5, G. Camerini2, R. Seracchioli3, N. Ragni1, P.L. Venturini4 and V. Remorgida1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Martino Hospital and University of Genoa, Largo R. Benzi 1 16132, Genoa, Italy 2 Department of Surgery, San Martino Hospital and University of Genoa, Largo R. Benzi 1 16132, Genoa, Italy 3 Minimally Invasive Gynaecological Surgery Unit, Reproductive Medicine Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna 40138, Bologna, Italy 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute G. Gaslini 16147, Genoa, Italy

5 Correspondence address. Tel/Fax: +39 010511525; E-mail: dr{at}simoneferrero.com

BACKGROUND: The available data on effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors in treating pain symptoms related to endometriosis is limited. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole combined with norethisterone acetate versus norethisterone acetate alone in treating pain symptoms.

METHODS: This prospective, open-label, non-randomized trial included 82 women with pain symptoms caused by rectovaginal endometriosis. Patients received either a combination of letrozole and norethisterone acetate (group L) or norethisterone acetate alone (group N) for 6 months. Changes in pain symptoms during treatment and in the 12 months of follow-up were evaluated. Side effects of each treatment protocol were recorded.

RESULTS: Intensity of chronic pelvic pain and deep dyspareunia significantly decreased during treatment (P < 0.001 versus baseline by 3 months) in both study groups. At both 3- and 6-month assessment, the intensity of chronic pelvic pain (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively) and deep dyspareunia (P < 0.001, P = 0.005, respectively) was significantly lower in group L than group N. At completion of treatment, 63.4% of women in group N were satisfied with treatment compared with 56.1% in group L (P = 0.49). Pain symptoms recurred after the completion of treatment; at 6-month follow-up no difference was observed in the intensity of pain symptoms between the groups. Adverse effects were more frequent in group L than in group N (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS: The combination drug regimen was more effective in reducing pain and deep dyspareunia than norethisterone acetate; however, letrozole caused a higher incidence of adverse effects, cost more and did not improve patients' satisfaction or influence recurrence of pain.

Key words: aromatase inhibitors/endometriosis/letrozole/norethisterone acetate/prospective study

Submitted on June 28, 2009; resubmitted on July 25, 2009; accepted on August 4, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.