Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on October 3, 2009
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dep342
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/12/3136    most recent
dep342v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Purewal, S.
Right arrow Articles by van den Akker, O.B.A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Purewal, S.
Right arrow Articles by van den Akker, O.B.A
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A study of the effect of message framing on oocyte donation

S. Purewal1,3 and O.B.A van den Akker1,2

1 Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London NW4 4BT, UK 2 Centre for Human Reproductive Sciences, Birmingham Women's Health Care Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK

3 Correspondence address. Tel: +44 (0)20-8411-6861; E-mail: S.Purewal{at}mdx.ac.uk

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to examine the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on British and South East Asian women's intentions towards oocyte donation and to examine whether the components of the theory of planned behaviour influenced the relationship between framing and intentions.

METHODS: A total of 406 women participated in this study (mean age = 22, SD = 2.9). There were 211 participants in the gain condition and 195 in the loss condition.

RESULTS: An analysis of covariance found a main effect for framing (F(1, 402) = 6.3; P < 0.01) after controlling for existing attitudes towards oocyte donation and pre-message intentions to donate. Specifically, participants in the gain-framed condition were significantly more likely to report higher post-message intentions to donate oocytes than participants in the loss condition. However, the framing effect was only observed with British populations and not with women from South East Asia. Further, structural equation modelling analyses revealed lower levels of ‘perceived behavioural control’ (β = –0.420, P < 0.03) and positive attitudes towards ‘the importance of genetic ties between parent and child’ (β = 0.70, P < 0.001) were direct predictors of post-message intentions in the gain (but not loss) frame condition.

CONCLUSION: Findings obtained from this study indicate that oocyte donation campaigns should consider using gain-framed messages in recruitment appeals and message frames should be matched to the target populations’ perceived level of behavioural control.

Key words: oocyte donation/infertility/framing effect/theory of planned behaviour/health promotion

Submitted on June 9, 2009; resubmitted on August 11, 2009; accepted on September 1, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.