Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on October 14, 2009

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dep360
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/1/253    most recent
dep360v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wise, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hatch, E. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wise, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hatch, E. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

An internet-based prospective study of body size and time-to-pregnancy

Lauren A. Wise1,2,5, Kenneth J. Rothman1,3, Ellen M. Mikkelsen4, Henrik Toft Sørensen1,4, Anders Riis4 and Elizabeth E. Hatch1

1 Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA 2 Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, 1010 Commonwealth Ave, 4th floor, Boston, MA 02215, USA 3 RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA 4 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

5 Correspondence address. E-mail: lwise{at}bu.edu

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that both female and male obesity may delay time-to-pregnancy (TTP). Little is known about central adiposity or weight gain and fecundability in women.

METHODS: We examined the association between anthropometric factors and TTP among 1651 Danish women participating in an internet-based prospective cohort study of pregnancy planners (2007–2008). We categorized body mass index (BMI = kg/m2) as underweight (<20), normal weight (20–24), overweight (25–29), obese (30–34) and very obese (≥35). We used discrete-time Cox regression to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS: We found longer TTPs for overweight (FR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00), obese (FR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.58–0.97), and very obese (FR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42–0.88) women, compared with normal weight women. After further control for waist circumference, FRs for overweight, obese, and very obese women were 0.72 (95% CI = 0.58–0.90), 0.60 (95% CI = 0.42–0.85) and 0.48 (95% CI = 0.31–0.74), respectively. Underweight was associated with reduced fecundability among nulliparous women (FR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.63–1.06) and increased fecundability among parous women (FR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.08–2.39). Male BMI was not materially associated with TTP after control for female BMI. Compared with women who maintained a stable weight since age 17 (–5 to 4 kg), women who gained ≥15 kg had longer TTPs (FR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59–0.88) after adjustment for BMI at age 17. Associations of waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio with TTP depended on adjustment for female BMI: null associations were observed before adjustment for BMI and weakly positive associations were observed after adjustment for BMI.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm previous studies showing reduced fertility in overweight and obese women. The association between underweight and fecundability varied by parity.

Key words: fertility/obesity/body mass index/prospective study/cohort study

Submitted on May 15, 2009; resubmitted on August 19, 2009; accepted on September 9, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.