Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 4, 868-870,
April 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Debate |
Sex Preselection: an aid to couples or a threat to humanity?
Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy
Whenever there is a new technological tool that pries into the secrets of life the majority reacts with caution, if not negatively altogether. On 10 September 1998, the Italian press gave the news of the discovery of a method to predetermine the sex of a new baby with 90% accuracy (Fugger et al., 1998
) in sensational terms: `A little boy or a little girl? Soon children by order!' (La Repubblica); `The new method (of sex preselection) is under accusation' (Il Corriere della Sera); `Science without limitations; alarm and polemics' (Il Messaggero).
Although we are no exception to the rule of skin-deep reactions and see the obvious reasons for this type of behaviour, we also believe that bioethics teaches us, before we pass a moral judgement, to ask ourselves a few fundamental questions, the first two being:
Notes
References
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S Matthew Liao The ethics of using genetic engineering for sex selection J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2005; 31(2): 116 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Malpani, A. Malpani, and D. Modi Preimplantation sex selection for family balancing in India Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2002; 17(1): 11 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Savulescu and E. Dahl Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis: A response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1879 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

