Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 7, 1669-1671,
July 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Debate |
Antisperm antibodies
Detection assays for antisperm antibodies: what do they test?
1 Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, NL 2300 RC Leiden, and 2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
The lack of a standardized and universally accepted assay for the detection of antisperm antibodies (ASA) which are specifically directed against known antigens, lack of consensus on clinical consequences of ASA (Krapez et al., 1998
) and absence of evidence for a mechanistic explanation on how ASA impair conception, may be the reasons why physicians are not inclined to test for ASA in subfertile couples.
Balancing pros and cons of ASA testing for our patients has been discussed in a number of reviews (Marshburn and Kutteh, 1994
; Naz and Menge, 1994
). The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (1998) sees `the main reason for testing for antibodies to identify couples who may warrant earlier referral for assisted reproductive technology'. In their excellent paper on unexplained infertility, Taylor and Collins concluded their chapter entitled `antisperm antibody presence and fertility', by commenting that `large prospective studies based on newer validated assay
Qualitative detection
Quantitative detection
Detection of a specific antigen-antibody bond
Conclusions
Notes
References
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Bohring and W. Krause Immune infertility: towards a better understanding of sperm (auto)-immunity: The value of proteomic analysis Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 915 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Naz and S. C. Chauhan Presence of antibodies to sperm YLP12 synthetic peptide in sera and seminal plasma of immunoinfertile men Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 21 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Nikolaeva, V. I. Kulakov, I. V. Korotkova, E. L. Golubeva, D. V. Kuyavskaya, and G. T. Sukhikh Antisperm antibodies detection by flow cytometry is affected by aggregation of antigen-antibody complexes on the surface of spermatozoa Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2545 - 2553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mahmoud and F. Comhaire Antisperm antibodies: Use of the mixed agglutination reaction (MAR) test using latex beads Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 231 - 233. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.M. Helmerhorst and J.J. Erwich Antisperm antibodies: Comment on the use of the MAR test using latex beads Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 233 - 233. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hjort Antisperm antibodies: Antisperm antibodies and infertility: an unsolvable question? Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2423 - 2426. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Kutteh Antisperm antibodies: Do antisperm antibodies bound to spermatozoa alter normal reproductive function? Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2426 - 2429. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bronson Detection of antisperm antibodies: an argument against therapeutic nihilism Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1671 - 1673. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

