Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barlow, D.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barlow, D.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1-2, January 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Editorial

A time for consensus and consistency of reporting in clinical studies and the importance of new basic research

D.H. Barlow

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The field of clinical fertility research has been evolving over the past couple of decades, spurred on by the revolution brought about by assisted reproduction. With the maturity that has emerged, attention is now being paid to the real need to clarify and standardize terminology and definitions. The idea is not new; within national data registries definitions have had to be devised, but there has not been international consistency. The need for consistency is most pressing in relation to the reporting of success outcomes in assisted reproduction. This matter has been raised in recent articles in Human Reproduction (Barlow, 2003Go; Daya, 2003Go; Vail and Gardner, 2003Go).

In the reporting of ART success, a . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Ricci, L. Lo Bello, and K. Skerk
RCT of real versus placebo acupuncture in IVF
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1769 - 1770.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. van Wely, N. Bayram, F. van der Veen, and P. M.M. Bossuyt
Predicting ongoing pregnancy following ovulation induction with recombinant FSH in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1827 - 1832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N.H. Hjollund, J.P. Bonde, E. Ernst, S. Lindenberg, A.N. Andersen, and J. Olsen
Spontaneous abortion in IVF couples--a role of male welding exposure
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1793 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. van Wely, N. Bayram, F. van der Veen, and P. M.M. Bossuyt
Predictors for treatment failure after laparoscopic electrocautery of the ovaries in women with clomiphene citrate resistant polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 900 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Revel, A. Safran, A. Benshushan, A. Shushan, N. Laufer, and A. Simon
In vitro maturation and fertilization of oocytes from an intact ovary of a surgically treated patient with endometrial carcinoma: Case report
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1608 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A. Land and J. L.H. Evers
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Defining outcome in ART: a Gordian knot of safety, efficacy and quality
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1046 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]