Skip Navigation

Human Reproduction 2008 23(12):2615-2616; doi:10.1093/humrep/den422
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Hum. Reprod.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

What next for assisted reproductive technology? A plea for an evidence-based approach

André Van Steirteghem, Editor-in-Chief

vansteirteghema@humanreproduction.co.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Thanks to the initial quality of the submitted manuscripts and the journal's careful review process, each issue of Human Reproduction contains high-quality articles. For clinical infertility practice and especially the novel treatment options for infertile couples, we aim to provide the best available evidence indicating that a new therapeutic approach has a real benefit. Considering novel infertility treatments, one has always to bear in mind that the desired outcome must be better in comparison to the existing treatment options. In other words, an infertile couple must have a better chance of having a healthy child . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Hum. Reprod.:

Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now?
Marc A. Fritz
Hum. Reprod. 2008 23: 2617-2621. [Extract] [Full Text]  

Preimplantation genetic screening: the end of an affair?
Bart C.J.M. Fauser
Hum. Reprod. 2008 23: 2622-2625. [Extract] [Full Text]  

Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial
T. Hardarson, C. Hanson, K. Lundin, T. Hillensjö, L. Nilsson, J. Stevic, E. Reismer, K. Borg, M. Wikland, and C. Bergh
Hum. Reprod. 2008 23: 2806-2812. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
U.-B. Wennerholm, V. Soderstrom-Anttila, C. Bergh, K. Aittomaki, J. Hazekamp, K.-G. Nygren, A. Selbing, and A. Loft
Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2158 - 2172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]