Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1739-1743,
August 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Effects of cryopreservation on progesterone-induced ion fluxes and acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa
University of Padova, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Padova, Italy
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study evaluated the effects of cryopreservation on progesterone-induced variations of calcium ion concentration [Ca2+]i, plasma membrane potential and acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. Spermatozoa from 10 fertile donors were divided in two equivalent aliquots, one used as control (fresh spermatozoa) and the other used after freezingthawing. Measurement of spermatozoa [Ca2+]i before and after freezingthawing showed a significant reduction of basal [Ca2+]i in thawed spermatozoa (P < 0.01). Progesterone induced a rise of [Ca2+]i both in fresh and thawed spermatozoa with a significant reduction after freezingthawing (P < 0.01). The monitoring of sperm plasma membrane potential demonstrated that progesterone induced plasma membrane depolarization in fresh spermatozoa that was absent in thawed spermatozoa. The inhibitory effects of freezingthawing on progesterone induced [Ca2+]i and plasma membrane potential variations in human spermatozoa were closely related to the inhibition of the acrosome reaction. In conclusion the present study demonstrates that freezingthawing procedures reduce the responsiveness of human spermatozoa to progesterone in terms of [Ca2+]i rise and completely inhibit its effects on plasma membrane potential variations, thus supporting the hypothesis that freezingthawing procedures may differently modify the plasma membrane receptors for progesterone in human spermatozoa which are known to express at least two receptors for this steroid in their plasma membrane.
Key words: calcium/cryopreservation/membrane potential/progesterone/spermatozoa
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Frozenthawed human spermatozoa are routinely used for many assisted insemination and fertilization programmes by donor and by husband (Sherman, 1973
In this study we have evaluated the effects of freezing and thawing procedures on progesterone-induced [Ca2+]i, plasma membrane potential variations and acrosome reaction induction in human spermatozoa from fertile donors.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Semen collection
From October 1999 to January 2000 we evaluated semen samples of volunteer fertile sperm donors. Semen was produced by masturbation into sterile containers from 13 healthy, fertile donors after 3 days of sexual abstinence. After liquefaction at room temperature for 30 min (mean room temperature 2022°C), all samples were evaluated for semen volume, sperm concentration, percentage motility and normal morphology, percentage viable spermatozoa following the indications of the World Health Organization (WHO, 1992
Sperm cryopreservation
Sperm aliquots to be frozen were diluted (1:1, v:v) with human sperm cryopreservation medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The diluted aliquots were drawn into 0.25 ml sterile plastic straws (130x2 mm, CryoBiosystem, L'Aigle Cedex, France) and placed in the chamber of a programmable biological freezer (Biomed Kryo 10/1.7 III, Planer Bloxed, Sunbury, UK) and cooled with the freezing programme described previously (Serafini and Marrs, 1986
). In brief: from room temperature to 5°C at a rate of 0.5°C/min; from 54°C at a rate of 1°C/min; from 43°C at a rate of 2°C/min; from 32°C at a rate of 4°C/min; from 21°C at a rate of 8°C/min; from 1°C to 80°C at a rate of 10°C/min. Sperm straws were then maintained at this temperature for 10 min and then plunged into liquid nitrogen (196°C) for 60 min.
Thawing procedure
Sperm samples were maintained in liquid nitrogen for 60 min and then thawed by placement of the straws upright on a rack at room temperature until all visible ice was gone.
Sperm preparation
The non-frozen sperm aliquot from each donor remained in seminal plasma at room temperature until the frozen aliquot was placed into liquid nitrogen. After this time and after thawing of frozen spermatozoa, motile cells from each aliquot were isolated by the swim-up technique as previously described (Foresta et al., 1992
). Before and after isolation, motile spermatozoa were washed in BiggersWhittenWhittingham (BWW) medium containing (in mmol/l): 95 NaCl, 4.8 KCl, 1.7 CaCl2, 1.2 KH2PO4, 1.2 MgSO4, 25 NaHCO3, 20 HEPES (N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulphonic acid), 5.6 fructose, 0.25 sodium pyruvate, 3.7 ml/l sodium lactate syrup (60%) to pH 7.4 and resuspended at a concentration of 10x106 spermatozoa/ml. Aliquots of fresh and thawed spermatozoa isolated as above were incubated in the absence and presence of progesterone (1.0 µg/ml) for 120 min at 37°C in a controlled atmosphere (5% CO2 and 95% O2). After incubation sperm samples were evaluated for motility, viability and acrosome reaction.
Acrosome reaction evaluation
Sperm aliquots from fresh and thawed sperm suspensions were retrieved before and after incubation with progesterone in the different experimental conditions as described above. After fixation with formaldehyde the percentage of acrosome reacted spermatozoa was assayed using an indirect fluorescence technique with FITCconjugated lectins from pisum sativum which selectively binds to intact acrosome (Morales and Cross, 1989
). Then non-fluorescent spermatozoa were scored as acrosome reacted while fluorescent spermatozoa were scored as acrosome intact. Two hundred spermatozoa were scored in each sample to evaluate the percentage of acrosome reacted spermatozoa.
Measurement of spermatozoa [Ca2+]i
[Ca2+]i was measured utilizing the fluorescent probe fura-2/AM (Foresta et al., 1996
): spermatozoa isolated as above were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the presence of fura-2/AM (2 µmol/l). After loading, spermatozoa were washed to remove extracellular fura-2/AM by centrifugation at 800 g for 10 min, resuspended in BWW and maintained at room temperature until used. One ml sperm aliquots were used to measure [Ca2+] in a LS50B Perkin Elmer fluorometer equipped with a thermostat and magnetically-stirred cuvette holder (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). The excitation wavelength was alternated between 350 and 380 nm and emission fluorescence was continuously monitored at 505 nm.
Evaluation of sperm plasma membrane potential changes
Sperm plasma membrane changes were monitored utilizing the potential sensitive fluorescent dye bis-oxonol as previously described (Foresta et al., 1996
). Briefly, 1.5x106 spermatozoa were placed in a cuvette containing the bis-oxonol solution (200 nmol/l) in BWW at 37°C. After stabilization of the fluorescent signal, progesterone was added to sperm suspension at the final concentration of 1.0 µg/ml. Excitation and emission wavelengths were 540 and 580 nm respectively.
Statistical analysis
Experimental data were analysed using the Stat View II (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA, USA) statistical package. Data are reported as mean ± SD of 10 separate experiments performed in triplicate. Statistical analysis was carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test. A P value of < 0.05 was chosen as the limit for statistical significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of cryopreservation on sperm motility and viability
Freezingthawing procedures induced a reduction of viability and motility when compared with those of fresh semen (Table I
|
Evaluation of spermatozoa [Ca2+]i
Measurement of [Ca2+]i in sperm aliquots before and after freezing and thawing showed a significant reduction of basal levels of [Ca2+]i in thawed spermatozoa with respect to those found in fresh spermatozoa (77.8 ± 17.6 versus 113.4 ± 13.1 nmol/l, P < 0.01). Progesterone (1.0 µg/ml) induced a prompt and rapid rise of [Ca2+]i in fresh spermatozoa followed by a sustained plateau phase (Figure 1
|
Evaluation of sperm plasma membrane potential
The monitoring of sperm plasma membrane potential variations induced by progesterone showed that this steroid induced a rapid and long lasting plasma membrane depolarization in fresh spermatozoa (Figure 2
|
Effects of progesterone on acrosome reaction in fresh and frozenthawed spermatozoa
Figure 3
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although a number of different procedures utilizing different freezing protocols and cryoprotectants have been proposed, motility and fertilizing ability of mammalian and human spermatozoa are greatly reduced after freezing and thawing procedures (Centola et al., 1992
In this study we have evaluated the effects of freezingthawing procedures on the progesterone-induced effects in human spermatozoa. The results of this study demonstrated that human sperm cryopreservation modified the ability of spermatozoa to respond to progesterone in terms of [Ca2+]i increase, plasma membrane depolarization and acrosome reaction induction. In fact in frozenthawed spermatozoa, the [Ca2+]i rise induced by this steroid was significantly lower than that observed in fresh spermatozoa. Furthermore freezingthawing procedures deeply modified the action of progesterone on plasma membrane potential variations blunting the depolarizing effects of this steroid in all thawed sperm samples. The lack of any depolarizing effect of progesterone in human spermatozoa after freezing and thawing procedures was not due to sperm plasma membrane collapse since gramicidin D was promptly able to depolarize it. Cryopreservation induced also a reduction of the percentages of sperm acrosome reaction induced by progesterone, probably due to a reduction of the effects on [Ca2+]i rise and plasma membrane depolarization observed in frozenthawed spermatozoa after progesterone addition. These results are in agreement with that previously demonstrated, i.e. that both [Ca2+]i rise and Na+-dependent plasma membrane depolarization are important events in the biological pathway leading to acrosome reaction induced by progesterone in human spermatozoa (Foresta et al., 1993
; Garcia and Meizel, 1996
). The reasons for these effects are not known but it is possible that the freezingthawing procedures may have induced damage to the sperm plasma membrane leading to a reduction of Ca2+ influx and the inhibition of Na+ influx followed by plasma membrane depolarization. Thus, in agreement with the existence of at least two progesterone receptors on human sperm plasma membrane, one coupled to Ca2+ influx and [Ca2+]i rise and the other coupled to Na+ influx and plasma membrane depolarization (Foresta et al., 1993
, 1995
; Sabeur et al., 1996
), it could be postulated that the Na+ channel or the progesterone-receptor coupled to its activation is more sensitive to freezingthawing procedures than that coupled to Ca2+ influx activation. The small increase in acrosome reaction percentages induced by progesterone in frozenthawed spermatozoa (although not significantly different from controls) may be due to the small rise of [Ca2+]i induced by the steroid, and that might have been sufficient (Foresta et al., 1993
) for acrosome reaction induction in a small number of spermatozoa. Another possibility is that, in a small number of spermatozoa, progesterone may also have induced a plasma membrane depolarization that could not be detected by our system.
The reduction of progesterone induced [Ca2+]i rise observed in spermatozoa after freezingthawing may be due (i) to the lack of voltage-operated calcium channels (VOCC) activation induced by progesterone-dependent plasma membrane depolarization that can be observed only in fresh spermatozoa and is completely absent in thawed spermatozoa or (ii) to the lack of Ca2+ influx through a Na+-permeable channel that is not functional in thawed spermatozoa and that is permeable also to Ca2+ (Foresta et al., 1993
). Further studies are needed to confirm these hypotheses.
All these data put together demonstrate that cryopreservation modifies the responsiveness of human spermatozoa to putative physiological sperm activators such as progesterone. These results could explain the reduced fertilizing potential of frozenthawed spermatozoa. At present it is difficult to understand what the precise effects of freezingthawing procedures on human spermatozoa are but it is possible to postulate that cryopreservation alters plasma membrane receptors for progesterone thus modifying sperm responsiveness to this steroid. Further studies will be necessary to evaluate the effects of cryopreservation on human sperm functions and to develop new strategies for freezing and thawing that preserve the functional integrity of spermatozoa.
| Notes |
|---|
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: University of Padova, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Clinica Medica 3, Via Ospedale 105, 35128 Padova, Italy.E-mail: forestac{at}protec.it
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Agarwal, A., Tolentino, M.V. Jr, Sidhu, R.S. Jr et al. (1995) Effect of cryopreservation on semen quality in patients with testicular cancer. Urology, 46, 382389.[Web of Science][Medline]
Al-Hasani, S., Demirel, L.C., Schopper, B. et al. (1999) Pregnancies achieved after frozenthawed pronuclear oocytes obtained by intracytoplasmic sperm injection with spermatozoa extracted from frozenthawed testicular tissues from non-obstructive azoospermic men. Hum. Reprod., 14, 20312035.
Alvarez, J.G. and Storey, B.T. (1993) Evidence that membrane stress contributes more than lipid peroxidation to sublethal cryodamage in cryopreserved human sperm: glycerol and other polyols as sole cryoprotectant. J. Androl., 14, 199209.
Barthelemy, C., Royere, D., Hammahah, S. et al. (1990) Ultrastructural changes in membranes and acrosome of human sperm during cryopreservation. Arch. Androl., 25, 2940.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ben-Yosef, D., Yogev, L., Hauser, R. et al. (1999) Testicular sperm retrieval and cryopreservation prior to initiating ovarian stimulation as the first line approach in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum. Reprod., 14, 17941801.
Blackmore, P.F., Beebe, S.J., Danforth, D.R. et al. (1990) Progesterone and 17-alfa-hydroxyprogesterone. Novel stimulators of calcium influx in human sperm. J. Biol. Chem., 256, 13761380.
Centola, G.M., Raubertas, R.F. and Mattox, J.H. (1992) Cryopreservation of human semen: comparison of cryopreservation, sources of variability and prediction of post-thaw survival. J. Androl., 13, 283288.
Check, M.L., Check, J.H. and Long, R. (1991) Detrimental effects of cryopreservation on structural and functional integrity of the sperm membrane. Arch. Androl., 27, 155160.[Web of Science][Medline]
Critser, J.K., Arneson, B.W., Aaker, D.V. et al. (1987) Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. II. Postthaw chronology of motility and zona-free hamster ova penetration. Fertil. Steril., 47, 980984.[Web of Science][Medline]
Cohen, J., Felten, P. and Zeilmaker, G.H. (1981) In vitro fertilizing capacity of fresh and cryopreserved human spermatozoa: a comparative study of freezing and thawing procedures. Fertil. Steril., 36, 356362.[Web of Science][Medline]
Foresta, C., Rossato, M. and Di Virgilio, F. (1995) Differential modulation by protein kinase C of progesterone-activated responses in human sperm. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 206, 408413.[Web of Science][Medline]
Foresta, C., Rossato, M., Chiozzi, P. et al. (1996) Mechanism of human sperm activation by extracellular ATP. Am. J. Physiol., 270, C1709-C1714.
Foresta, C., Rossato, M. and Di Virgilio, F. (1992) Extracellular ATP is a trigger for the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. J. Biol. Chem., 267, 1944319447.
Foresta, C., Rossato, M. and Di Virgilio, F. (1993) Ion fluxes through the progesterone-activated channel of the sperm plasma membrane. Biochem. J., 294, 279283.
Garcia, M.A. and Meizel, S. (1996) Importance of sodium ion to the progesterone-initiated acrosome reaction in human sperm. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 45, 513520.[Web of Science][Medline]
Keel, B.A. and Black, J.B. (1980) Reduced motility and longevity in thawed human spermatozoa. Arch. Androl., 4, 213218.[Web of Science][Medline]
Lass, A., Akagbosu, F., Abusheikha, N. et al. (1998) A programme of semen cryopreservation for patients with malignant disease in a tertiary infertility centre: lessons from 8 years' experience. Hum. Reprod., 13, 32563261.
Meizel, S. and Turner, K.O. (1991) Progesterone acts at the plasma membrane of human sperm. Mol. Cell Endocrinol., 77, R1R5.[Web of Science][Medline]
Morales, P. and Cross, N.L. (1989) A new procedure for determining acrosomal status of very small numbers of human sperm. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 37, 12911292.
Osman, R.A., Andria, M.L., Jones, A.D. et al.. (1989) Steroid induced exocytosis: the human sperm acrosome reaction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 160, 828833.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sabeur, K., Edwards, D.P. and Meizel, S. (1996) Human sperm plasma membrane progesterone receptor(s) and the acrosome reaction. Biol. Reprod., 54, 9931001.[Abstract]
Serafini, P. and Marrs, R.P. (1986) Computerized staged-freezing technique improves sperm survival and preserves penetration of zona-free hamster ova. Fertil. Steril., 45, 854858.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sherman, J.K. (1973) Synopsis of the use of frozen human semen since 1964: state of the art of human semen banking. Fertil. Steril., 24, 397412.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sherman, J.K. (1980) Historical synopsis of human semen banking. In David, G. and Price, W.S. (eds) Human artificial insemination and semen preservation. Plenum Press, New York, p. 66.
Shenfield, F., Doyle, P., Valentine, A. et al. (1993) Effects of age, gravidity and male infertility status on cumulative conception rates following artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor semen: analysis of 2998 cycles of treatment in one centre over 10 years. Hum. Reprod., 8, 6064.
Wassarmann, P.M. (1987) The biology and chemistry of fertilization. Science, 235, 553560.
WHO (1992) World Health Organization laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semencervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Submitted on March 13, 2000; accepted on May 19, 2000.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Patrat, C. Serres, and P. Jouannet Progesterone Induces Hyperpolarization after a Transient Depolarization Phase in Human Spermatozoa Biol Reprod, June 1, 2002; 66(6): 1775 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



