Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 10, 2136-2138,
October 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
An idiopathic infertility with oocytes metaphase I maturation block
Case report
1 Departments of Reproductive Biology and Cytogenetics and 2 Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHI Poissy Saint Germain, 78303 Poissy, Paris-Ouest University, France
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: A case of idiopathic primary infertility was attributed to a block in oocyte meiosis affecting the transition between metaphase I and metaphase II. METHODS AND RESULTS: A couple suffering unexplained primary infertility was unsuccessfully treated by various means of assisted reproductive technology. After four unsuccessful pregnancy attempts using intrauterine inseminations (IUI), IVF was attempted (all oocytes remained unfertilized), followed by an ICSI cycle. None of the retrieved oocytes expelled the polar body, and therefore were not injected. The failure of these assisted reproduction cycles was, in both cases, due to the immaturity of the oocytes recovered. Cytogenetic analysis of the oocytes retrieved for ICSI provided evidence of meiotic arrest. Using cytogenetic staging criteria we were able to show that this arrest occurred between metaphase I and anaphase I. CONCLUSIONS: Meiotic blocks affecting oocytes have already been described for various mammals. We discuss here mechanisms that might be involved in this possibly inherited disorder in humans, and ways in which our knowledge of them could be increased.
Key words: ICSI/meiosis block/metaphase I/oocytes
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 10% of cases, infertility remains unexplained after exploration of both the female and the male partner by standard diagnostic means (Greenhouse et al., 1998
| Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients
We report here the case of a 36 year old male and a 34 year old female with a history of 14 years of primary infertility. Routine infertility investigations (serum FSH and LH concentrations, hysterography and semen analysis) detected no signs of perturbation. Basal body temperature was biphasic, karyotypes were 46,XY and 46,XX. Hypofertility was reported for three of the four sisters of the female proponent: one had conceived two children with assisted reproduction treatments, one had had three miscarriages and no liveborn children, and one had not become pregnant in a period of 15 years.
IVF cycle
IVF was considered after the failure of four cycles of intrauterine insemination. After pituitary down-regulation, the ovaries were stimulated with 150 IU recombinant FSH daily from days 17 and with 225 IU FSH from days 812. Only the right ovary responded to hormonal stimulation, but follicle progression on ultrasound and serum oestradiol concentrations were considered satisfactory. The patient received 10 000 IU of HCG on day 13 (serum oestradiol concentration was 1138 pg/ml). Thirtysix hours later three oocytes were retrieved by ultrasound-guided follicular puncture. Attempts to achieve IVF with 90 000 motile spermatozoa per oocyte were unsuccessful. On the following day none of these oocytes was fertilized and none had a polar body. The couple was informed of the results, and were offered a second cycle with an ICSI procedure to make it possible to check the oocyte maturity and to increase the fertilization rate.
ICSI cycle
After pituitary down-regulation, the ovaries were stimulated with 225 IU FSH daily from days 111. Both ovaries responded and 10 000 IU HCG was administered on day 12 (serum oestradiol concentration was 3090 pg/ml). Ten follicles were aspirated and 10 oocytes of normal mean diameter were retrieved and treated with hyaluronidase (80 IU/ml). None of the oocytes had extruded the first polar body. They were incubated for a further 4 h in P1 culture medium (Irvine Scientific, Paisley, Renfrewshire, UK) and examined again, but their appearance remained unchanged. It was decided jointly by the couple, the embryologist and the gynaecologist not to inject the immature oocytes. Injection was deferred to the following day, with a new sperm sample, provided that the oocytes reached the MII stage in vitro. Twenty-four hours later all the oocytes were still at the MI stage, therefore ICSI was not performed. Two oocytes were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 in P1 culture medium for a further 24 h but neither extruded the polar body. The other eight oocytes were fixed by the Tarkowski technique (Tarkowski, 1966
) to evaluate their chromosomal constitution and for cytogenetic staging to identify the stage at which meiosis was arrested. We were able to analyse seven of the eight fixed oocytes after staining with 3% Giemsa solution. All had 46 chromosomes which appeared to be in metaphase with either: (i) replicated chromosomes in homologous pairs close together or linked by chiasmata (chromosomes become competent to adopt this configuration at mid-pachytene stage); or (ii) replicated chromosomes already dissociated (suggestive of anaphase I initiation or of the start of chromosome pair degeneration) (Figure 1
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Meiosis I blocks have already been observed in the human female germ line. Few reports have dealt with this abnormality: Harrison recently reported two cases similar to our case with MI block and a lack of in-vitro maturation (Harrison et al., 2000
Reports of meiosis 1 arrest are more frequent for the male than the female germ line, in humans (Handel, 1997
; Lange et al., 1997
) and in various animal species (Baker and Plug, 1996; Zhu et al., 1997
). Genetic control was suspected before molecular analysis became available, on the basis of familial history and pathological examinations on the testis (Luciani, 1981
). The molecular mechanisms of chromosomal desynapsis impairment in the male germ line are now partially understood (Okabe et al., 1998
; Escalier, 1999
).
In meiotic arrest of spermatocytes, both paired and unpaired homologous metaphase chromosomes are observed, due to asynapsis or the formation of fragmented synaptonemal complexes as described by Lange (Lange et al., 1997
), or desynapsis impairment, leading to the arrest of these cells in meiosis I. Similar observations are often made, but not always investigated in testis biopsies in secretory azoospermic men, in the search for mature spermatozoa that could be used for ICSI. These cases are usually diagnosed as `meiotic arrest'.
The scarcity of observations of a similar disorder in women may be due to a recruitment and observation bias, as the number of available meiotic cells from oocytic puncture is generally lower than that available from testis biopsies. Alternatively, the frequency of this type of syndrome may be lower in the female germ line. Several molecular events regulating meiosis are known to differ in males and females; it is not possible to determine the mechanisms involved or incidence, by extrapolation (Baker et al., 1996
; Yuan et al., 2000
).
As human oocytes, whether normal or abnormal, are difficult to obtain and are not used primarily for research, the use of targeted mutagenesis in animals (Simon et al., 1997
) seems essential to progress in this field. Indeed, the mechanisms controlling the process of meiosis are intricate and diverse, operating both in the oocyte nucleus (microtubule organizing centre, spindle, centromeric structure) and in the cytoplasm (qualitative and quantitative modifications affecting various organelles: Golgi apparatus, mitochondria, ribosomes). These mechanisms also involve the surrounding environment (culture conditions) and the cells in contact with the oocytes (paracrine intercellular interaction factors) (Fulka et al., 1998
).
As stated previously, a block in oocyte meiosis has previously been reported in animal models, including various strains of mice. The fact that only specific recombinant inbred strains are affected is consistent with the polygenic control of meiosis (Eppig and Wigglesworth, 1994
; Eppig et al., 1996
).
From a practical point of view, the couple was informed of the results and of the likelihood that the same outcome would occur if another attempt was made. Oocyte donation and adoption were discussed.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We thank Gina Maklar and Serono for help in the translation of the manuscript.
| Notes |
|---|
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:mabpoissy{at}hotmail.com
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baker, S., Plug, A., Prolla, A.W. et al. (1996) Involvement of mouse Mlh 1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over Nat. Genet., 13, 336342.[Web of Science][Medline]
Fulka, J., First, N. and Moor, R. (1998) Nuclear and cytoplasmic determinants involved in the regulation of mammalian oocyte maturation. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 4, 4149.
Eppig, J. and Wigglesworth, K. (1994) Atypical maturation of oocytes of strain I/LnJ mice. Hum. Reprod., 9, 11361142.
Eppig, J., Wigglesworth, K., Varnum, D. et al. (1996) Genetic regulation of traits essential for spontaneous ovarian teratocarcinogenesis in strain LT/Svmice: aberrant meiotic cell cycle, oocyte activation and parthenogenetic development. Cancer Res., 56, 50475054.
Escalier, D. (1999) Mammalian spermatogenesis investigated by genetic engineering. Histol. Histopathol., 14, 945958.[Web of Science][Medline]
Greenhouse, S., Rankin, T. and Dean, J. (1998) Genetic causes of female infertility: targeted mutagenesis in mice. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 62, 12821287.[Web of Science][Medline]
Handel, M. (1997) Monitoring meiosis in gametogenesis. Theriogenology, 49, 423430.
Harrison, K., Sherring, D. and Keeping, J. (2000) Repeated oocyte maturation block. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 17, 231233.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hartshorne, G., Montgomery, S., Klentzeris, L. and MRCOG (1999) A case of failed oocyte maturation in vivo and in vitro. Fertil. Steril., 71, 567570.[Web of Science][Medline]
Lange, R., Krause, W. and Engel, W. (1997) Analyses of meiotic chromosomes in testicular biopsies of infertile patients. Hum. Reprod., 12, 215421158.
Luciani, J.M. (1981) Le contrôle génétique de la méïose chez l'homme. In Spira, A. and Jouannet, P. (eds) Les colloques de l'INSERM. Facteurs de la fertilité humaine. INSERM, Paris, vol. 103, p. 153.
Okabe, M., Ikawa, M. and Ashkenas, J. (1998) Gametogenesis `98: male infertility and the genetics of spermatogenesis. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 62, 613.[Web of Science][Medline]
Pellestor, F. and Sèle, B. (1988) Assessment of aneuploidy in the human female by using cytogenetics of IVF failure. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 42, 274283.[Web of Science][Medline]
Selva, J., Martin-Pont, B., Hugues, J.N. et al. (1991) Cytogenetic study of human oocytes uncleaved after in vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod., 6, 709713.
Simon, A., Goodenough, D., Li, E. and Paul, D. (1997) Female infertility in mice lacking connexin 37. Nature, 385, 525529.[Medline]
Tarkowski, A.K. (1966) An air drying method for chromosome preparations of mouse eggs. Cytogenetics, 3, 393400.
Yuan, L., Liu, J., Zhao, J. et al. (2000) The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosomes synapsis and male fertility. Mol. Cell., 5, 7383.[Web of Science][Medline]
Zhu, D., Dix, D. and Eddy, E. (1997) HSP70-2 is required for CDC2 kinase activity in meiosis I of mouse spermatocytes. Development, 124, 30073014.[Abstract]
Submitted on February 7, 2001; accepted on June 26, 2001.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.L. Marin Bivens, B. Lindenthal, M.J. O'Brien, K. Wigglesworth, T. Blume, C. Grondahl, and J.J. Eppig A synthetic analogue of meiosis-activating sterol (FF-MAS) is a potent agonist promoting meiotic maturation and preimplantation development of mouse oocytes maturing in vitro Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2340 - 2344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Marin Bivens, C. Grondahl, A. Murray, T. Blume, Y.-Q. Su, and J. J. Eppig Meiosis-Activating Sterol Promotes the Metaphase I to Metaphase II Transition and Preimplantation Developmental Competence of Mouse Oocytes Maturing in Vitro Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1458 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mrazek and J. Fulka Jr Failure of oocyte maturation: Possible mechanisms for oocyte maturation arrest Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2249 - 2252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M.H. Combelles, D. F. Albertini, and C. Racowsky Distinct microtubule and chromatin characteristics of human oocytes after failed in-vivo and in-vitro meiotic maturation Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2124 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schmiady and H. Neitzel Arrest of human oocytes during meiosis I in two sisters of consanguineous parents: first evidence for an autosomal recessive trait in human infertility: Case report Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2556 - 2559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


