Skip Navigation

Human Reproduction 2005 20(6):1747-1748; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh695
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Auer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwaerzler, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Auer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwaerzler, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Reply: Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer

M. Auer1 and P. Schwaerzler

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Innsbruck, Austria

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: margherita.auer{at}uibk.ac.at

Sir,

We appreciate the interest of van der Ven and Montag in our study and their useful comments.

The primary aim of our retrospective cohort study was neonatal outcome. Hence, the purpose of our study was not to demonstrate superior performance of embryo transfer at blastoccyst stage (BS-group) over cleavage stage (CS-group), but that there is no difference in fetal outcome. This is why we investigated only IVF cycles that led to a successful pregnancy. However, there is convincing evidence that higher pregnancy rates after blastocyst transfer are not due to a selection bias (Coskun et al., 2000Go), but due to the opportunity to choose more viable and genetically normal embryos.

Van der Ven and collegues also appreciated that maternal age was not significantly different in both study populations. Our discussion does point out that patients in the BS-group were slightly younger because with time we have enlarged the population of patients entering the BS-group. However, elevated maternal age certainly increases the risk for trisomies but not for other chromosomal abnormalities such as Turner syndrome and triploidies. The risk for trisomy 21 at term is 1:776 at the age of 31 and 1:446 at the age of 34, which is still considered to be low risk using a cut-off level of 1:250 (Snijders et al., 1999Go).

It is also true that the prevalence of dizygotic twins increases with maternal age, but the prevalence is still only 2% at the age of 35; a twin rate of 45% as described in the CS-group of our study population cannot be explained by higher maternal age alone.

We believe that our data give evidence that it is safe to cultivate embryos to the blastocyst stage in terms of neonatal outcome and fetal abnormalities. Moreover, we think that decreasing the multiple pregnancy rate in ART by transfering fewer but more competent embryos is important since preterm delivery is a major cause of fetal death and handicap in obstetrics.

References

Coskun S, Hollanders J, Al-Hassan S et al. (2000) Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial. Hum Reprod 15, 1947–1952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Snijders R, Sundberg K, Holzgreve W et al. (1999) Maternal age and gestation-specific risk for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13, 167–170.[Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Auer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwaerzler, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Auer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwaerzler, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?