Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on September 27, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(12):3091-3095; doi:10.1093/humrep/del207
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/12/3091    most recent
del207v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asimakopoulos, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nikolettos, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asimakopoulos, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nikolettos, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Cytokine and hormonal profile in blood serum and follicular fluids during ovarian stimulation with the multidose antagonist or the long agonist protocol

Byron Asimakopoulos1, F. Köster2, R. Felberbaum3, S. Al-Hasani2, K. Diedrich2 and Nikos Nikolettos1,4

1 Laboratory of Physiology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece 2 Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck and 3 Clinic for Obstetrics/Gynecology, University of Kempten, Kempten, Germany

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Laboratory of Physiology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece. E-mail: nnikolettos{at}hotmail.com


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to explore cytokine and hormonal profiles in blood and follicular fluids from normal women stimulated with either the multidose antagonist or the long agonist protocol. METHODS: Fifty-six patients were stimulated with the multidose antagonist protocol and 12 with the long agonist protocol. Interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF{alpha}), leptin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), estradiol (E2), progesterone and testosterone levels were measured in serum and follicular fluids by immunoassays. RESULTS: The two treatment groups had similar cytokine concentrations in serum. The intrafollicular concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-6, VEGF and leptin were also similar in the two groups. The concentrations of bFGF in follicular fluids from the antagonist group (169.5 ± 113.2 ng/ml) were lower than those from the agonist group (249.7 ± 119.8 ng/ml). bFGF concentrations were correlated with the amount of administered gonadotrophins (R = 0.364, P < 0.01) which was significantly lower in the antagonist group (antagonist group: 2037.7 ± 725.8 IU; agonist group: 2836.4 ± 1163.5 IU). CONCLUSIONS: Normal women stimulated with either the multidose antagonist or the long agonist protocol generally have similar cytokine profiles in serum and follicular fluids. The intrafollicular levels of bFGF tend to be lower in antagonist cycles because of the lower amount of administered gonadotrophins.

Key words: cytokines/estradiol/FGF/ovarian stimulation/progesterone


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Cytokines, having multifarious functions, are present in every physiological process within the human body. It is unanimously recognized that many cytokines are of crucial importance in reproductive processes such as follicular development, ovulation, fertilization, implantation and embryo development. The role of cytokines in the female reproductive system has been broadly investigated during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF attempts. It is clear that under COS, the functions of the female reproductive system are distinctively different than in normal cycles, and it is also generally admitted that the type of COS differentially influences the reproductive functions.

The history of assisted reproduction techniques (ART) during the last 20 years is characterized by the development of new types of COS to maximize the success and minimize the complications. So far, the most common type of COS is the so-called long agonist protocol, while COS with GnRH antagonists is gaining ground during the last 5 years. Both types of COS have been extensively studied and compared in terms of clinical outcome (Albano et al., 2000Go; Borm and Mannaerts, 2000Go; Ludwig et al., 2000Go; Olivennes et al., 2000Go; European-Middle East Orgalutran Study Group, 2001Go; Fluker et al., 2001Go; Al-Inany and Aboulghar, 2002Go; Roulier et al., 2003Go). However, up to now, there have been no studies investigating their possible differences regarding the cytokine levels.

The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare, for the first time, the levels of six cytokines in serum and follicular fluids of women undergoing COS with either the long agonist protocol or the multiple-dose GnRH antagonist protocol. The investigated cytokines included three proinflammatory cytokines—interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF{alpha})—two growth factors—vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)—and leptin. Additionally, we investigated and compared the levels of steroid hormones—estradiol (E2) and progesterone.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
This prospective study was carried out at the Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck (Lübeck, Germany). Sixty-eight patients attending the IVF unit of the department for ICSI cycles were recruited in the period between November 2002 and May 2003, according to the following criteria: (i) absence of any apparent abnormality of their reproductive system, as revealed by their medical history, the clinical examinations and common hormonal tests; the indication for ICSI/embryo transfer was male factor infertility exclusively; (ii) absence of any metabolic and immunological disease; (iii) age of women between 28 and 38 years and (iv) adequate response to COS; low responders as well as patients with basal FSH > 10 mIU/ml were excluded. Patients gave their written informed consent and did not receive any monetary compensation for participating in the study. From each patient, only one cycle was included in the study.

Stimulation protocols, ICSI and embryo transfers
The stimulation was made with recombinant FSH (Gonal-F®; Serono International S.A., Geneva, Switzerland) and hMGs (Menogon®; Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH, Kiel, Germany). The total doses of administered gonadotrophins were individualized according to serum E2 levels and transvaginal ultrasound measurements of the developing follicles. The pituitary suppression was made with the use of cetrorelix (Cetrotide®; ASTA Medica AG, Frankfurt/Main, Germany and Serono International S.A.) or triptorelin (Decapeptyl Depot®; Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH). The COS with cetrorelix followed the multidose protocol (Lübeck protocol) and the COS with triptorelin followed the long protocol (Diedrich and Felberbaum, 1998Go; Ludwig et al., 1999Go; Felberbaum et al., 2000Go). Thus, the studied population was divided into two groups: the antagonist group (n = 54) and the agonist group (n = 12). In all cases, the induction of ovulation was made with 10 000 IU hCG (Choragon®; Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH), when the leading follicle reached a diameter of 18–20 mm measured by transvaginal ultrasound and when E2 levels indicated a satisfactory follicular response. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval assisted by ultrasound monitoring was performed 36 h later.

After ICSI, one to three embryos were transferred in each cycle, in accordance with the German law. Before the embryo transfers, a cumulative embryo score (CES) was calculated, as described elsewhere (Asimakopoulos et al., 2002Go), paying attention to the degree of fragmentation and regularity of blastomeres.

The presence of positive fetal heartbeats was indicative of clinical pregnancies.

Sample collection
Blood serum was collected on the day of hCG administration and on the day of oocyte retrieval. Follicular fluid samples were collected on the day of oocyte retrieval. From each patient, follicular fluid samples were collected among the first one to three mature follicles containing metaphase II oocytes; they were pooled and placed into sterile tubes. All follicular fluid samples were immediately centrifuged for 15 min at 480 g and aliquots of the supernatants were stored. Follicular fluid samples with obvious blood contamination or mixed with flushing fluids were excluded. All materials were stored at –20°C until further analysis.

Measurements
In serum and follicular fluid samples, the levels of the following hormones and cytokines were measured: E2, progesterone, IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF{alpha}, bFGF, VEGF and leptin. Additionally, testosterone levels were measured in serum samples.

In serum samples, E2, progesterone and testosterone levels were measured with Elecsys immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) having the following intra- and inter-assay variation (AV): <5 and <10% for E2, <3 and <5% for progesterone and <5 and <7% for testosterone, respectively. All the other measurements were made with commercial enzyme immunoassay kits as follows: (i) E2: DSL-10-4300 Active Estradiol EIA (DSL, Webster, TX, USA), intra-AV: 3.3–4.8%, inter-AV: 6.5–8.2% and minimum detectable dose (MDD): 7 pg/ml; (ii) progesterone: DE2200 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), intra-AV: 4.9–7.65%, inter-AV: 2.7–8.3% and MDD: 8.57 pg/ml; (iii) IL-1beta: Quantikine DLB50 (R&D Systems), intra-AV: 2.8–8.5%, inter-AV: 4.1–8.4% and MDD: 1 pg/ml; (iv) IL-6: Quantikine D6050 (R&D Systems), intra-AV: 1.6–4.2%, inter-AV: 3.3–6.4% and MDD: 0.7 pg/ml; (v) TNF{alpha}: Quantikine DTA00C (R&D Systems), intra-AV: 4.2–5.2%, inter-AV: 4.6–7.4% and MDD: 0.5 pg/ml; (vi) VEGF: Quantikine DVE00 (R&D Systems), intra-AV: 4.5–6.7%, inter-AV: 6.2–8.8% and MDD: 5 pg/ml; (vii) bFGF: ChemiKine CYT142 Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA, intra-AV: 8.2%, inter-AV: 10.1% and MDD: 0.488 ng/ml; and (viii) leptin: Quantikine DLP00 (R&D Systems), intra-AV: 3–3.3%, inter-AV: 3.5–5.4% and MDD: 7.8 pg/ml.

As the above kits are validated for serum samples but not for follicular fluids, before running follicular fluid samples, we checked the recovery rate of at least three spiked follicular fluid samples and the linearity of the results after multiple dilutions. The results were satisfactory, with recovery rates ranging from 80 to 130%.

All samples were measured in duplicate, according to manufacturers’ instructions. In cases of very high or low results, the measurements were repeated. The cytokine and hormonal concentrations are expressed as nanograms or picograms per millilitre of follicular fluid.

Statistical analysis
The normality of all studied parameters was checked with Shapiro–Wilks’ W-test. The statistical evaluation included descriptive statistics for both studied groups. Comparisons between the groups were performed with either the t-test or two non-parametric tests—Mann–Whitney U-test and Kolmogorov–Smirnov. Comparisons between the two times of sampling were made with the application of t-test for dependent samples or the Wilcoxon test for matched pairs. Rates were compared by {chi}2 test. Correlations were evaluated with Spearman’s rank test. The two-tailed significant level was set at P < 0.05. The software we used for statistical analysis was STATISTICA 6.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Demographic and clinical data of the studied groups are presented in Table I.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table I. Clinical data of the two studied groups

 
The group of agonist received a significantly higher amount of gonadotrophins to achieve satisfactory follicular development [95% confidence interval (CI): 2054.7–3618 versus 1841.5–2233.9 IU]. There were 14 pregnancies in the antagonist group and four pregnancies in the agonist group, with the difference not at a statistically significant level (Yates corrected {chi}2 = 0.1, P = 0.918; Fisher’s exact P = 0.735). There were only five cases of mild ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), three of them in the agonist group ({chi}2 = 5.12, P = 0.024; Fisher’s exact P = 0.055).

Hormonal and cytokine concentrations in blood serum
The concentrations of the three hormones (E2, progesterone and testosterone), as well as of the six cytokines in blood serum samples, in both studied groups, are presented in Table II.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table II. Hormonal and cytokine concentrations in the serum samples of the two studied groups

 
Regarding the concentrations of the cytokines, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Between the two sampling times, there were no statistically significant changes in cytokine levels.

E2 levels, in both sampling times, were positively correlated with the number of follicles (E2 on the day of hCG administration: R = 0.518, P < 0,01; E2 on the day of oocyte aspiration: R = 0.405, P < 0.05). Progesterone at the time of oocyte aspiration was also significantly and positively correlated with the number of follicles (R = 0.611, P < 0.01). bFGF, at the time of oocyte aspiration, was positively correlated with the total amount of gonadotrophins (R = 0.721, P < 0.01).

Hormonal and cytokine concentrations in follicular fluid
The concentrations of the studied hormones and cytokines in follicular fluid samples are presented in Table III.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table III. Hormonal and cytokine concentrations in the follicular fluid samples of the studied groups

 
The differences between the two studied groups in the intrafollicular concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines, VEGF and leptin were not statistically significant.

The concentrations of bFGF in follicular fluids from the agonist group were significantly higher (95% CI: 169.2–330 ng/ml) than those from the antagonist group (95% CI: 138–201 ng/ml). At the same time, there was a difference close to the statistically significant level regarding progesterone intrafollicular concentrations which were higher in the agonist (95% CI: 20 848.1–30 081 ng/ml) than in the antagonist group (95% CI: 16 734.9–21 925.7 ng/ml).

Intrafollicular progesterone concentrations were correlated with the total amount of administered gonadotrophins (R = 0.433, P < 0.05). bFGF concentrations were positively correlated with the patients’ age (R = 0.502, P < 0.01) and the amount of gonadotrophins (R = 0.364, P < 0.01).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The present study is the first one comparing the cytokine profiles in serum and follicular fluids in women stimulated with the long agonist or the multidose antagonist protocol. The two studied groups were comparable in terms of several parameters such as age, BMI and the number and quality of transferred embryos. ICSI was applied in all cases, by the same experienced personnel. The inclusion of women with normal reproductive functions and adequate response to ovarian stimulation was imperative, since various infertility disorders seem to be related to elevated cytokine levels, and thus, possible bias in the results was avoided. In the Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology of Lübeck, the antagonist protocols are almost solely used owing to the large experience that has been acquired on the use of GnRH antagonists. In this study, the recruitment period coincided with the transitional period of switching from the long protocol to the total use of antagonist protocols. Consequently, it was difficult to recruit many patients in the agonist group, whereas at the same time, they would fulfill the inclusion criteria. The number of patients in the agonist group constitutes the main limitation of the study. It can be argued that with a larger number of patients in the agonist group, some differences, such as those in the intrafollicular progesterone levels, could have reached the level of statistical significance.

We did not adjust the protein levels in each sample before measuring the levels of the cytokines, as follicular fluid samples contaminated with blood or flushing medium were excluded. Besides, this is the usual method followed by most of the relevant published studies. By expressing intrafollicular levels of cytokines as picograms or nanograms per milligram of total protein content, the comparison of our data with the data published in other studies would have become extremely difficult.

According to the results, there were no significant differences between the two stimulation protocols regarding the concentrations of the studied cytokines in serum, either on the day of hCG administration or on the day of oocyte aspiration. Similarly, the intrafollicular concentrations of TNF{alpha}, IL-1beta, IL-6, VEGF and leptin did not present significant differences between the two stimulation protocols.

In general, the concentrations of the six cytokines studied here were higher in follicular fluids than in serum samples. This fact underlines the importance of the local regulation of the six cytokines in the follicular compartment. Since cytokines have mostly a paracrine or an autocrine mode of action, we believe that intrafollicular concentrations represent their role in ovarian functions better than blood concentrations. The concentrations of cytokines in the blood may be influenced by extraovarian production sites, and the extraovarian production of cytokines does not always contribute significantly to the concentrations of cytokines in the follicular compartment. Thus, we believe that intrafollicular concentrations of cytokines have a special interest regarding the study of the role of cytokines in ovarian functions.

The intrafollicular levels of bFGF were significantly lower in the antagonist group than in the agonist one. bFGF is known as a growth factor involved in the folliculogenetic process. It has been reported as an initiator of folliculogenesis by inducing primordial follicle development (Nilsson et al., 2001Go) and as a regulator of ovarian angiogenesis, though not as drastic as VEGF. During the follicular development, FSH induces the expression of functional receptors for bFGF, and this growth factor possibly plays a role in the differentiation and the viability of granulosa cells (Shikone et al., 1992Go). At the time of ovulation, it seems that bFGF exerts antiapoptotic actions on granulosa cells, thus supporting the formation of corpus luteum (Peluso and Pappalardo, 1999Go; Lynch et al., 2000Go). It is also known that bFGF is one of the major luteal angiogenic factors (Reynolds and Redmer, 1998Go). Thus, it could be presumed that higher bFGF intrafollicular concentrations, at the time of ovulation, may contribute to the formation of a more functional corpus luteum.

The intrafollicular concentrations of progesterone were also found to be lower in GnRH antagonist cycles than in GnRH agonist ones, with the difference being close to statistical significance.

At the same time, the intrafollicular concentrations of both progesterone and bFGF were significantly correlated with the amount of gonadotrophins. Taking into consideration that the patients stimulated with the GnRH antagonist protocol received significantly less gonadotrophins than the patients stimulated with the long protocol, it seems reasonable to suggest that the differences in bFGF and progesterone concentrations between the two groups are at least partly explained by the difference in the amount of administrated gonadotrophins.

The concentrations of the three proinflammatory cytokines (TNF{alpha}, IL-1beta and IL-6) were low or below the detection limit in both groups. This can be explained by the absence of any apparent pathology in the women included in this study. High levels of proinflammatory cytokines have been reported in cases of infertility due to immunological disorders, endometriosis and polycystic ovarian syndrome (Cianci et al., 1996Go; Calogero et al., 1998Go; Pellicer et al., 1998Go; Bedaiwy et al., 2002Go; Amato et al., 2003Go). Samples with undetectable concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines have also been reported by other investigators (Barak et al., 1992Go; Punnonen et al., 1992Go; Büscher et al., 1999Go; Aboul Enien et al., 2001Go; Asimakopoulos et al., 2005Go), whereas it has been reported that TNF{alpha} in follicular fluids not only has low concentrations but also shows minimal bioactivity (Wang et al., 1992Go).

In conclusion, normal women following COS with a GnRH antagonist or a GnRH agonist have a generally similar cytokine profile in serum and follicular fluid samples. The intrafollicular levels of bFGF and progesterone tend to be lower in normal women following COS with a GnRH antagonist than in those following the long protocol, possibly due to the lower amount of gonadotrophins administrated in GnRH antagonist cycles.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The study was supported by DAAD and the Greek Scholarships Foundation (IKY) through the programme IKYDA 2002. The authors thank the following persons for technical assistance: Dr Beatte Schöpper, Fransesco Curro, Christiana Schultz, Barbara Nehls and Dr med. Maria Minou.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Aboul Enien WM, Lewis-Jones ID, Vince GS. (2001) Follicular fluid cytokines and IVF outcome. Middle East Fertil Soc J 6:206–211.

Albano C, Felberbaum RE, Smitz J, Riethmüller-Winzen H, Engel J, Diedrich K, Devroey P. (2000) Controlled ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the LHRH-antagonist cetrorelix (cetrotide) and the LHRH-agonist buserelin. Hum Reprod 15:526–531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Al-Inany H and Aboulghar M. (2002) Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 17:874–885.[Abstract]

Amato G, Conte M, Mazziotti G, Lalli E, Vitolo G, Tucker AT, Bellastella A, Carella C, Izzo A. (2003) Serum and follicular fluid cytokines in polycystic ovary syndrome during stimulated cycles. Obstet Gynecol 101:1177–1182.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Asimakopoulos B, Nikolettos N, Al-Hasani S. (2002) Outcome of cryopreserved pronuclear oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation with either HMG or recFSH and the GnRH-antagonist cetrorelix. Reprod Biomed Online 5:52s–56s.

Asimakopoulos B, Nikolettos N, Papachristou DM, Simopoulou M, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K. (2005) Follicular fluid levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and leptin are associated with pregnancy outcome of normal women participating in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Physiol Res 54:263–270.[Web of Science][Medline]

Barak V, Mordel N, Holzer H, Zajicek G, Treves AJ, Laufer N. (1992) The correlation of interleukin 1 and tumour necrosis factor to oestradiol, progesterone and testosterone levels in periovulatory follicular fluid of in-vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod 7:462–464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bedaiwy MA, Falcone T, Sharma RK, Goldberg JM, Attaran M, Nelson DR, Agarwal A. (2002) Prediction of endometriosis with serum and peritoneal fluid markers: a prospective controlled trial. Hum Reprod 17:426–431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Borm G and Mannaerts BMJL. (2000) Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group. Hum Reprod 15:1490–1498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Büscher U, Chen FCK, Kentenich H, Schmiady H. (1999) Cytokines in the follicular fluid of stimulated and non-stimulated human ovaries; is ovulation a suppressed inflammatory reaction? Hum Reprod 14:162–166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Calogero AE, Nicoletti F, Palumbo MA, Burrello N, Di Mauro M, Lunetta M, Bendtzen K, Cianci A. (1998) Macrophage-derived cytokines in the follicular fluids of women with infertility due to immunological causes. Elevated levels of interleukin 6 and low levels of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Cytokine 10:814–818.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cianci A, Calogero AE, Palumbo MA, Burrello N, Ciotta L, Palumbo G, Bernardini R. (1996) Relationship between tumour necrosis factor {alpha} and sex steroid concentrations in the follicular fluid of women with immunological infertility. Hum Reprod 11:265–268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Diedrich K and Felberbaum R. (1998) New approaches to ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 13:1s–13s.

European-Middle East Orgalutran Study Group. (2001) Comparable clinical outcome using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix or a long protocol of the GnRH agonist triptorelin for the prevention of premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 16:644–651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Felberbaum RE, Albano C, Ludwig M, Riethmüller-Winzen H, Grigat M, Devroey P, Diedrich K. (2000) Ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction with HMG and concomitant midcycle administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix according to the multiple dose protocol: a prospective uncontrolled phase III study. Hum Reprod 15:1015–1020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fluker M, Grifo J, Leader A, Levy M, Meldrum D, Muasher SJ, Rinehart J, Rosenwaks Z, Scott RT, Schoolcraft W, et al. (2001) Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 75:38–45.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ludwig M, Felberbaum RE, Diedrich K. (1999) Interactions of GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins. In Adashi EY, Baird DT, Crosignani PG (Eds.). Gonadotrophins and Fertility(Christengraf, Rome) Vol. 1: pp. 125–143.

Ludwig M, Felberbaum RE, Diedrich K. (2000) LHRH antagonist protocols in IVF do not lead to worse results than the long LHRH agonist protocol. Ref Gynecol Obstet 7:249–250.

Lynch K, Fernandez G, Pappalardo A, Peluso JJ. (2000) Basic fibroblast growth factor inhibits apoptosis of spontaneously immortalized granulosa cells by regulating intracellular free calcium levels through a protein kinase C{delta}-dependent pathway. Endocrinology 141:4209–4217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nilsson E, Parrott JA, Skinner MK. (2001) Basic fibroblast growth factor induces primordial follicle development and initiates folliculogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 175:123–130.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Olivennes F, Belaisch-Allart J, Emperaire JC, Dechaud H, Alvarez S, Moreau L, Nicollet B, Zorn JR, Bouchard P, Frydman R. (2000) A prospective randomized controlled study in IVF-ET with a single dose of a LH-RH antagonist (cetrorelix) or a depot formula of a LH-RH agonist (triptorelin). Fertil Steril 73:314–320.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Pellicer A, Albert C, Mercader A, Bonilla-Musoles F, Remohí J, Simón C. (1998) The follicular and endocrine environment in women with endometriosis: local and systemic cytokine production. Fertil Steril 70:425–431.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Peluso JJ and Pappalardo A. (1999) Progesterone maintains large rat granulosa cell viability indirectly by stimulating small granulosa cells to synthesize basic fibroblast growth factor. Biol Reprod 60:290–296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Punnonen J, Heinonen PK, Teisala K, Kujansuu E, Jansen CT, Punnonen R. (1992) Demonstration of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in preovulatory follicular fluid: its association with serum 17 beta-estradiol and progesterone. Gynecol Obstet 33:80–84.

Reynolds LP and Redmer DA. (1998) Expression of the angiogenic factors, basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor, in the ovary. J Anim Sci 76:1671–1681.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Roulier R, Chabert-Orsini V, Sitri MC, Barry B, Terriou P. (2003) Depot GnRH agonist versus the single dose GnRH antagonist regimen (cetrorelix, 3 mg) in patients undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Reprod Biomed Online 7:185–189.[Medline]

Shikone T, Yamoto M, Nakano R. (1992) Follicle-stimulating hormone induces functional receptors for basic fibroblast growth factor in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 131:1063–1068.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang LJ, Brännström M, Robertson SA, Norman RJ. (1992) Tumor necrosis factor {alpha} in the human ovary: presence in follicular fluid and effects on cell proliferation and prostaglandin production. Fertil Steril 58:934–940.[Web of Science][Medline]

Submitted on November 1, 2005; resubmitted on January 20, 2006; resubmitted on March 7, 2006; resubmitted on April 20, 2006; accepted on May 3, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
C. Metallinou, B. Asimakopoulos, A. Schroer, and N. Nikolettos
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in the Ovary
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2007; 14(8): 737 - 749.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/12/3091    most recent
del207v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asimakopoulos, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nikolettos, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asimakopoulos, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nikolettos, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?