Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on November 17, 2005
Human Reproduction 2006 21(2):558-564; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei367
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/2/558    most recent
dei367v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lampic, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tydén, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lampic, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tydén, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics

C. Lampic1,3, A. Skoog Svanberg2, P. Karlström2 and T. Tydén1,2

1 Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala Science Park, S-751 83 Uppsala and 2 Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Academic Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 10B, 751 83 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail: claudia.lampic{at}pubcare.uu.se


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Postponing childbirth is becoming increasingly common in Western countries, especially among groups with higher education qualifications. It is relatively unknown to what extent women and men are aware of the age-related decline in female fertility. The aim was to investigate university students’ intentions and attitudes to future parenthood and their awareness regarding female fertility. METHODS: Postal survey of a randomly selected sample of 222 female (74% response) and 179 male (60% response) university students. RESULTS: Female and male university students in Sweden have largely positive attitudes towards parenthood and want to have children. Women, in comparison to men, were significantly more concerned about problems related to combining work and children. Both women and men had overly optimistic perceptions of women’s chances of becoming pregnant. About half of women intended to have children after age 35 years and were not sufficiently aware of the age-related decline of female fecundity in the late 30s. CONCLUSIONS: University students plan to have children at ages when female fertility is decreased without being sufficiently aware of the age-related decline in fertility. This increases the risk of involuntary infertility in this group, which is alarming in view of the great importance they put on parenthood.

Key words: attitudes/fertility/parenting/universities


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
During the late 20th century, women in Western countries have delayed birth of the first child to a later age than in previous centuries. In Sweden, the median age of first-time mothers has increased by 4 years during the last 30 years (Statistics Sweden, 2005Go). In 2004 the median age at first birth was 29 for women and 31 for men, which means that many couples postpone their childbearing until ages when female fertility or reproductive capacity is decreased. There is a slight decrease in women’s chances of pregnancy at ovulation in the late 20s and marked decrease of fecundity occurs between ages 35 and 39 years (Dunson et al., 2002Go). Women aged >35 years have a 2-fold time to pregnancy compared to women aged <25 years (Hassan and Killick, 2003Go). In a recent study in Sweden (Statistics Sweden, 2001Go), 70% of 35 year old childless women stated that a difficulty in becoming pregnant was the main reason why they had not yet had children. While couples who experience difficulties achieving pregnancy can turn to assisted reproduction techniques, these compensate for only half of all births lost by postponing a first attempt to conceive from age 30 to age 35 years (Leridon, 2004Go). Thus, postponement of the first (and subsequent) births increases the incidence of involuntary childlessness.

There is a lack of studies concerning women’s and men’s awareness of fertility issues. In a database search, only two relevant studies were found. Blake et al. (1997Go) demonstrated that few women attending a fertility unit had an adequate understanding of when the fertile window occurred in their menstrual cycle. Adashi et al. (2000Go) performed a telephone survey (n = 7036) in six European countries, the USA and Australia. Results indicate that a majority underestimate the percentage of couples seeking medical assistance for infertility problems, i.e. 15%.

In a large survey (n = 2057) carried out in Sweden (Statistics Sweden, 2001Go), 95% of childless women and men aged 23–25 years stated that they wanted to have children in the future. Thus, most young people consider that becoming a parent is important. Among those who already had one child, ~80% wanted to have a second child, which indicates a strong two-child ideal. When women and men plan for a pregnancy they include a number of factors in their decision-making process (Morin et al., 2003Go). Several studies have shown that men and women regard having completed an education, holding a job, a stable income and good housing important for their decision to become parents (Statistics Sweden, 2001Go; Morin et al., 2003Go). These findings are supported by studies of women who have had an abortion (Rasch et al., 2001Go; Larsson et al., 2002Go). Results indicate that women perceive the age interval 25–34 years suitable for childbearing, and that women (or couples) postpone the birth of their first child until they feel prepared socially and financially to assume the responsibilities of parenting (Rasch et al., 2001Go). It has been shown that women with higher education embark on parenthood later in life (Heck et al., 1997Go; Statistics Sweden, 2002Go; Rnsen, 2004Go) and have a lower number of children than do women with less education (Rnsen, 2004Go). The situation is the reverse for men with those who are highly educated having a larger number of children compared to men with lower education (Statistics Sweden, 2002Go).

The trend of postponing childbirth is becoming increasingly common in Sweden and other Western countries, especially in groups with higher education. Postponing of childbirth until an age at which female reproductive capacity is lower entails risks of involuntary childlessness. It is at present relatively unknown to what extent young women and men are aware of the probability for women to become pregnant at different ages, and whether fertility awareness is related to timing of childbirth. In addition, men’s and women’s attitudes towards parenthood are a relatively unexplored territory in Sweden and abroad.

The main aim of the present study was to investigate perceptions of fertility issues, intentions for childbirth, as well as attitudes towards parenthood among male and female university students. We were particularly interested in students who had chosen a longer degree programme, as earlier studies have shown that students tend to postpone childbirth until they have earned their degrees (Statistics Sweden, 2001Go). The following specific research questions were posed: (i) Are there differences between female and male students with regard to intentions for childbirth, attitude towards parenthood, and awareness of fertility issues? (ii) Are there differences between women who intend to have their first child before versus after the age of 30 years with regard to perceptions of fertility issues?


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Participants and procedure
During spring semester 2004, 38 300 undergraduate students were registered at Uppsala University. The university offers 29 first-degree programmes of ≥4 years that lead to university degrees in, e.g., medicine, law, economics and engineering. The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at Uppsala University.

Six hundred randomly selected students (300 women and 300 men) enrolled in degree programmes of ≥4 years were invited to participate. Inclusion criteria were: (i) being enrolled at Uppsala University in 2002; and (ii) being registered as an active student in the spring 2004 semester. The number of eligible students was 1783 women and 1367 men with a mean age of 24.4 (women) and 23.8 (men) years. The total response frequency was 67%. The final sample consisted of 222 women (74%) and 179 men (60%). A questionnaire was mailed along with an information letter and a postage-paid reply envelope. Two reminders were sent out to non-respondents. A small number of questionnaires were returned due to incorrect postal address (three men and five women).

Demographic data of participants are shown in Table I. Participant age (mean = 24 years, SD 4.0) did not differ significantly from the mean age of the target population. Eleven per cent of students were born in countries other than Sweden. About half of students were currently living in a stable relationship that had lasted between 1 month and 24 years (median 2 years). Thirty-one students had children or were currently experiencing a pregnancy (with their partner). There were no significant differences between female and male participants regarding demographic variables.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Demographic characteristics of participants

 

Instrument
The questionnaire was developed on the basis of earlier research and professional experience of the team of authors (a gynaecologist, two nurse-midwives and a psychologist). Three pilot studies were carried out in order to test the instrument’s validity and reliability. Ten medical students, 20 nursing students and 30 students enrolled in different degree programmes participated in pilot studies. The questionnaire was revised based on remarks and opinions of these students, as well as on test–retest results. The final questionnaire comprised 56 questions covering the following areas.

Demographic data (10 items)
Participants were requested to state their age, type of housing, own and parents’ place of birth, personal experience of pregnancy (male responders reported pregnancy of female partner), and personal experience of problems achieving pregnancy.

Intention to have children (four items)
The first item was ‘Do you plan to have children?’ (Yes/No). An affirmative response was followed by three questions with an open response format: ‘How many children do you want?’, ‘At what age would you like to/did you have your first child?’, ‘At what age would you like to have your last child?’.

Importance of having children (one item)
‘How important is it for you to have children?’ Responses were given on a visual analogue scale (VAS) scale with extreme values Unimportant (0) and Extremely important (100).

Behavioural intention in case of infertility (three items)
In response to the question ‘What would you do if you and your partner could not get pregnant?’ participants were requested to assess the likelihood of their undergoing IVF, adopting, or choosing not to have children. Responses were given on a VAS scale with extreme values Entirely unlikely (0) and Highly likely (100).

Conditions of importance for the decision to become a parent (13 items)
Participants were requested to assess the importance of specific circumstances for their decision to become a mother/father (see Table IV). The response alternatives were Unimportant, Not very important, Rather important, Important, Very important, and No opinion. Alpha value 0.77 indicates internal consistency of this scale.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Important circumstances for women’s and men’s decision to have childrena

 
Perceived life changes in connection with becoming a parent (16 items)
Participants were requested to assess to what extent they agreed with items specifying possible (or experienced) consequences of parenthood (see Table V). The response alternatives were Disagree, Partially agree, Mainly agree, Strongly agree, Entirely agree, and No opinion. Alpha value 0.75 indicates internal consistency of this scale.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Women’s and men’s opinion on the impact of parenthooda

 
Awareness of fertility issues (nine items)
Participants were requested to answer questions regarding women’s fertility at different ages, couples’ chances of achieving a pregnancy, and questions regarding infertility (see Table VI for wording of the questions). In the questionnaire, it was emphasized that this was not a test of knowledge and respondents were requested to state what they believed. An open response format was used.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table VI. Women’s and men’s awareness of fertility issues

 
Data analyses
Comparisons of data by the female and male groups were performed with a number of statistical tests. Group comparisons of VAS data were performed with t-test for independent groups. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare men and women’s attitudes towards parenthood. Continuous data regarding perception of fertility issues were categorized into age periods or level of percentage. These categorizations are based on published data (van Noord-Zaadstra et al., 1991Go; Zinaman et al., 1996Go; Dunson et al., 2002Go; National Board of Health and Welfare, 2004Go; Nyboe Andersen et al., 2005Go). The ‘correct answer’ and at least one additional category are presented in segments constituting 5 years or 10% (in one case 5%). The boundaries of remaining categories are based on reported responses and may entail larger segments. Responses by different groups (i.e. men/women, women with intentions for first child before/after age 30 years) were compared using the {chi}2-test. Responses on VAS scales are reported in mm (0–100). P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Analyses were performed with the statistical package SPSS for Macintosh.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Intentions concerning having children among childless participants (n = 370)
Among participants who did not have children, most participants stated that they wanted to have children some day (see Table II). A majority (83% women, 86% men) preferred to have between two and three children. Men most often wished for two children only, while women’s responses were equally distributed between wishes for two, two to three, and three children. Women wanted to have their first child at a significantly lower age (mean = 28, SD = 2.7) compared to men (mean = 30, SD = 2.9) [t(369) = 5.06, P < 0.0001]. Women also wanted to be younger when they had their last child (mean = 35, SD = 3.0) in comparison to men’s preferences (mean = 36, SD = 4.0) [t(343) = 3.42, P < 0.001]. About half of women and men wanted to have their last child between ages 35 and 39 years, and 12% of women wanted to have their last baby in their 40s.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Intentions of having children among women and mena

 

Women regarded having children as being significantly more important (mean = 81, SD = 21.2) than did men (mean = 74, SD = 21.1) [t(392) = 3.44, P < 0.001]. In case of infertility, women were significantly more likely to pursue IVF treatment or adoption, and less likely to accept a life without children than were men (see Table III).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Presumed behaviour in case of infertilitya

 

Conditions of importance for the decision to become a parent
Almost all participants regarded living in a stable relationship, sharing responsibility with a partner and feeling sufficiently mature as important circumstances for their decision to become a parent (see Table IV). Having children before one is too old was regarded an important issue by half of women and a third of men. In addition, women put significantly more emphasis on the importance of having a good economy, access to childcare and a job that can be combined with having children. Analyses were based on data from all participants since omission of those who were pregnant or had children (n = 31) did not alter results.

Presumed (or experienced) life changes in connection with becoming a parent
A majority of participants stated that becoming a parent would entail personal development, giving and receiving more love and another view on what is important (see Table V). Women, to a greater degree than men, also presumed that parenthood would lead to new interests in life. Roughly a third of the women, but only 10% of the men, believed that parenthood would affect their status on the labour market negatively. In addition, women were significantly more pessimistic than men regarding the effect of parenthood on career and relationship with partner. Analyses were based on data from all participants since omission of those who already had children (n = 28) did not alter results.

Awareness of fertility issues
Participants had a relatively realistic perception of the most fertile period in a woman’s life, but markedly overestimated women’s fecundity (see Table VI). A minority of participants were aware that a slight decrease in women’s fecundity starts before the age of 30 years and a marked decrease occurs in the late 30s. About a third of male participants believed that women’s fecundity decreases markedly first after age 45 years. Both women and men made gross overestimations of a couple’s cumulative fecundity during 1 year of unprotected intercourse. Participants had a relatively accurate perception of the frequency of infertile couples, but overestimated the chances of receiving a child through IVF. Men reported significantly more ‘optimistic’ perceptions regarding age-related female fecundity than did women. In comparison with male participants, women were significantly more likely to overestimate fecundity at ovulation, the percentage of infertile couples and the chance of getting a child through IVF treatment. Omission of data from participants with children or current pregnancy did not alter the pattern of results.

Fertility awareness in women who plan to have their first child before versus after the age of 30 years
Participating childless/non-pregnant women were categorized according to whether they wanted to have their first child before the age of 30 years (n = 127) or later (n = 66). There were no significant differences between these groups with regard to fertility awareness (data not shown). Omission of five women aged >30 years (who could not choose to have children before the age of 30 years) did not alter results.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Almost all participants stated that they wanted to have children some day, and many preferred two children, which confirms the notion of the two-child ideal in Sweden (Statistics Sweden, 2001Go). Women’s and men’s preferred mean ages for becoming a parent are in line with the mean ages of first-time parents in Sweden in 2004 (Statistics Sweden, 2005Go). More than half of the women wanted to have their last child between ages 35 and 44 years, an age period during which female fecundity decreases markedly. Despite women and men’s similar personal intentions for childbirth, women regarded having children as being significantly more important than did men. The fact that women also were more likely to pursue IVF treatment or adoption in the case of infertility indicates that women regarded parenthood a more essential part of life than did men.

Participants regarded living in a stable relationship, sharing responsibility with a partner and feeling sufficiently mature as the most important circumstances for their decision to become a parent. These results confirm earlier results from Sweden (Statistics Sweden, 2001Go) and Denmark (Rasch et al., 2001Go). The finding that half of women regarded ‘having children before one is too old’ an important issue indicates that women are aware of the ‘biological clock’. However, the fact that a third of men gave importance to this issue suggests that age is an issue regarding parenthood in more respects than biological. The finding that women put more emphasis on the importance of having access to childcare and a job that can be combined with having children, indicates that women are more concerned about the practical issues concerned with combining work and parenthood. While a majority of participants associated becoming a parent with positive consequences, women were more pessimistic than men regarding the effect of parenthood on their status in the labour market and on the amount of time available for work and career. The latter results confirm findings from a recent survey of female academics in Germany (Kemkes-Grottenthaler, 2003Go), stating that many women viewed motherhood as an obstacle to career advancement. A majority of childless women in that study reported postponing motherhood due to both personal and job-related issues.

Participants overall markedly overestimated female fertility and were not sufficiently aware of the age-related decline in fecundity. Women had a more accurate perception of female age-related fecundity than did men, but they were more likely to overestimate chance of pregnancy at ovulation and chance of receiving a child through IVF.

The present results do not indicate a direct association between women’s intended timing of childbirth and their conceptions about fecundity. However, they do illustrate that women who choose to postpone their childbearing after the age of 30 years have overly optimistic perceptions of the chances to become pregnant during that age period. This suggests that women may base their decision regarding the timing of parenthood on misconceptions concerning women’s fecundity. In the study by Kemkes-Grottenthaler (2003)Go, only a few female academics had actively made the decision to forgo children, while a majority merely were postponing motherhood. A majority of the latter group hoped to have their first child by age 38 years (with a maximum age of 48 years). While few female participants of the present study preferred to have their first child in their late 30s, many wanted to have their last child during this age period, and another 12% planned to have their last child in their 40s. However, the natural decline in fertility often encountered at this age period may hinder women from having their desired number of children.

The present study has some methodological limitations. Limited resources restricted the size of the study sample, but the random selection of individuals adds to the external validity of the study. While there were no available background data for non-participants, comparison with the target population did not indicate response bias based on age. Also, the percentage of participants born outside Sweden corresponds well with the national percentage of immigrants in Sweden in 2004 (12%) (Statistics Sweden, 2005Go). However, the relatively low response rate among men limits the conclusions that can be drawn from the results for the male sample. Due to the lack of standardized instruments of relevance for the focus of the present study, a questionnaire was developed and underwent pilot testing among groups of students from the target population. The results from pilot tests and obtained alpha values indicate satisfactory reliability and validity of the instruments.

In conclusion, the present results indicate that female and male university students in Sweden have largely positive attitudes towards parenthood, although women expressed more concerns about problems related to combining work and children. Women and men want to have children but they overestimate the chances of achieving a pregnancy and are not sufficiently aware of the natural age-related decline of female fertility. Many female academics intend to have children during age periods when women’s fecundity is markedly decreased and may subsequently end up involuntarily childless or suffer secondary infertility. This is particularly alarming in view of the great importance these women put on parenthood. These findings indicate that female academics could benefit from information regarding fertility in order to make informed decisions regarding family planning.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Grants were received from The Family Planning Foundation at the Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Adashi E, Cohen J, Hamberger L, Jones H, de Kretser D, Lunenfeld B, Rosenwaks Z and Van Steirteghem A (2000) Public perception on infertility and its treatment: an international survey. Hum Reprod 15,330–334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blake D, Smith D, Bargiacchi A, France M and Gudex G (1997) Fertility awareness in women attending a fertility clinic. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 37,350–352.[Web of Science][Medline]

Dunson D, Colombo B and Baird D (2002) Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 17,1399–1403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hassan M and Killick S (2003) Effect of male age on fertility: evidence for the decline in male fertility with increasing age. Fertil Steril 79(Suppl 3),1520–1527.

Heck K, Schoendorf K, Ventura S and Kiely J (1997) Delayed childbearing by education level in the United States, 1969–1994. Maternal Child Health J 1,81–88.

Kemkes-Grottenthaler A (2003) Postponing or rejecting parenthood? Results of a survey among female academic professionals. J Biosoc Sci 35,213–226.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Larsson M, Aneblom G, Odlind V and Tydén T (2002) Reasons for pregnancy termination, contraceptive habits and contraceptive failure among Swedish women requesting an early pregnancy termination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81,64–71.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Leridon H (2004) Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Hum Reprod 19,1548–1553.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morin P, Payette H, Moos M, St-Cyr-Tribble D, Niyonsenga T and De Wals P (2003) Measuring the intensity of pregnancy planning effort. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 17,97–105.[CrossRef][Medline]

National Board of Health and Welfare (2004) Assisted reproduction. Results of treatment. 2002 Official Statistics of Sweden. http://www.sos.se.

Nyboe Andersen A, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, de Mouzon J and Nygren K (2005) Assisted reproduction technology in Europe. 2001 Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 20,1158–1176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rasch V, Knudsen L and Wielandt H (2001) Pregancy planning and acceptance among Danish pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80,1030–1035.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rnsen M (2004) Fertility and family policy in Norway—a reflection on trends and possible connections. Demographic Res 10,266–286.

Statistics Sweden (2001) Why so few babies? [In Swedish] Demographic reports 2001:1 Örebro.

Statistics Sweden (2002) How many children will I have? Fertility in a life-perspective [In Swedish] Demographic reports 2002:5 Örebro.

Statistics Sweden (2005) Population Statistics 2004. [In Swedish] BE 12 SM 0501 Örebro.

vanNoord-Zaadstra B, Looman C, Alsbach H, Habbema J, te Velde E and Karbaat J (1991) Delaying childbirth: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of preganancy. Br Med J 302(6789),1361–1365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zinaman M, Clegg E, Brown C, O’Connor J and Selevan S (1996) Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 65,503–509.[Web of Science][Medline]

Submitted on June 22, 2005; resubmitted on September 28, 2005; accepted on September 30, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Female contraception over 40
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2009; 15(6): 599 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Nyboe Andersen, E. Carlsen, and A. Loft
Trends in the use of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection marked variability between countries
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2008; 14(6): 593 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Bunting and J. Boivin
Knowledge about infertility risk factors, fertility myths and illusory benefits of healthy habits in young people
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1858 - 1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Boivin, L. Bunting, J. A. Collins, and K. G. Nygren
International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1506 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Bunting and J. Boivin
Decision-making about seeking medical advice in an internet sample of women trying to get pregnant
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1662 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
G.F. Homan, M. Davies, and R. Norman
The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 209 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, February 18, 2006; 332(7538): 432 - 432.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/2/558    most recent
dei367v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lampic, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tydén, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lampic, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tydén, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?