Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on October 25, 2006
Human Reproduction 2007 22(3):850-852; doi:10.1093/humrep/del413
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A successful IVFpregnancy in a patient who underwent conservative surgery followed by a regimen of cisplatin, vinblastine and peplomycin to treat an advanced ovarian mixed germ cell tumour: A Case Report
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapporo Medical University, School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1 West 16 Chuo-ku Sapporo 060-8543, Japan. E-mail: endot{at}sapmed.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mixed germ cell tumours of the ovary, one type of malignant ovarian germ cell tumours (MOGCTs), are rare gynaecologic cancers usually affecting young women. We report the case of a patient with an advanced ovarian mixed germ cell tumour who underwent fertility-saving surgery followed by a chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin, vinblastine and peplomycin. The patient was disease-free 8 years after initial presentation. She conceived and gestated dichorionic twins after IVFembryo transfer. To the best of our knowledge, the patient is the first to be treated successfully with the combination chemotherapy regimen and then conceive safely using assisted reproductive technology (ART).
Key words: assisted reproduction/pregnancy/chemotherapy/cancer/germ cell tumour
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Malignant ovarian germ cell tumours (MOGCTs) are rare gynaecologic cancers usually affecting young women. One type of MOGCT, the mixed germ cell tumour, is composed of more than one neoplastic germ cell element, for instance dysgerminoma combined with teratoma, yolk sac tumour, choriocarcinoma, embryonal carcinoma or polyembryoma, as well as any other possible combination of these tumour types (Kurman, 2002
Here, we present the case of a patient with an advanced ovarian mixed germ cell cancer who was treated conservatively and delivered twin babies after an IVFembryo transfer pregnancy. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a successful pregnancy with IVFembryo transfer after fertility-preserving treatment of an advanced-stage ovarian mixed germ cell tumour.
| Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 19-year-old woman consulted our department in January 1993 because of abnormal genital bleeding. Ultrasonography and computerized tomography scans revealed a 9- to 10-cm solid, non-homogeneous tumour filling the pelvis and a remarkable quantity of ascites in the abdominal cavity. Serum levels of Ca125, CA19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),
-fetoprotein and
-HCG were 89 U/ml, 13 U/ml, 1.4 ng/ml, 251 ng/ml and 8.7 ng/ml, respectively. A diagnosis of ovarian cancer was made, and a laparotomy was performed. After making a midline incision, samples were taken for peritoneal cytology, 3.5l of ascites fluid was drawn from the abdomen, and a right ovarian mass 910 cm in diameter (560 g) with numerous foci of peritoneal seeding was observed. Instead of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, right unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed along with infracolic omentectomy and an appendectomy. Bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomies were not done, as there were no lymph nodes to palpate. The peritoneal cytology was positive for malignancy, and the omentum and appendix were positive for tumour. The components of the ovarian specimen were 90% immature teratoma, 5% choriocarcinoma and 5% yolk sac tumour, leading to a histological diagnosis of primary ovarian mixed germ cell tumour. The tumour was determined to be stage IIIb according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification. After the surgery, the patient received six courses of chemotherapy regimen PVP (80 mg of cisplatin, 15 mg of vinblastine and 10 mg x 3 days of peplomycin). Consistent with our clinics policy, a second look operation (SLO), including wedge resection of the left ovary, was carried out 7 months after the first operation. No gross tumour was found during the second surgery, and frozen sections of suspicious areas were negative for tumour. Likewise, paraffin-embedded biopsy samples from several parts of the peritoneum were found to contain only well-differentiated glia and villi. There was no evidence of disease. In addition, left ovarian specimens revealed a corpus luteal cyst, and the patients menstrual cycle continued throughout the treatment. Seven months after the SLO, however, the patient showed peritoneal fluid retention that was highly dependent on the stage of her menstrual cycle.
The patient was 27 years old when first seen in our infertility section, with irregular ovulatory cycles. Her serum hormone levels at day 3 of the cycle were as follows: FSH, 13.53 mIU/ml (follicular phase normal range: 5.214.4 mIU/ml); LH, 4.36 mIU/ml (follicular phase normal range: 1.87.6 mIU/ml); prolactin, 12.45 ng/ml (normal range: 3.2026.2 ng/ml); and estradiol, 38.03 pg/ml (follicular phase normal range: 19255 pg/ml). All tumour markers, including Ca125, CA19-9, CEA,
-fetoprotein and
-hCG, were within the normal range. The patient underwent hysterosalpingography, and left tubal passage was confirmed. Her partners sperm was normal.
We first thought that the patient might be able to become pregnant as a matter of natural course, without the use of assisted reproduction technology (ART). However, the adnexa in this patient were floating in a substantial amount of peritoneal fluid, which we surmised was making it difficult for the fimbria to retrieve the oocyte.
In an effort to achieve pregnancy, the patient underwent a short regimen of GnRH agonist. Initially, 300IU of human menopausal gonadotrophin (Nikken Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) was administered from day 3 to day 8 of her menstrual cycle. The number of developed follicles was four. She then received hCG on day 9, and four oocytes were retrieved 34h later, after the retained peritoneal fluid (300 ml) was removed by vaginal puncture. After the specimen was cytocentrifuged, an air-dried smear was stained with Giemsa stain and alcohol-fixed smears were stained with Papanicolaou stain and periodic acid/Schiff (PAS) alcian blue stain. We analysed cancer cells and found no evidence for cancer. All of the oocytes were successfully fertilized and reached the 3- to 5-cell stage on day 2 after fertilization. The patient elected to have three embryos transferred on that day. The remaining embryo was cryopreserved. The patient conceived and gestated dichorionic twins but suffered from abdominal tenderness due to accumulation of peritoneal fluid as a result of the embryo transfer. On five occasions during the period extending from day 10 after embryo transfer to the 11th week of gestation, this fluid (3.5l in total) was removed from the Douglas pouch by puncture. No peritoneal fluid was obtained with the last puncture. After 29 weeks of gestation, the patient presented with preterm labour and was administered a tocolytic agent, ritodrine. The tocolysis was successful, and a healthy female infant weighing 2380 g and a male infant weighing 2198 g were delivered by selective Caesarean section after 36 weeks of gestation. At that time, there was no evidence of residual tumour, but a filmy adhesion between the peritoneum and uterus was observed, suggesting the earlier peritoneal fluid retention was due to a pseudocyst. Both babies did well through the neonatal period. Following the Caesarean section, there was no longer accumulation of peritoneal fluid during menstrual cycles.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The combination chemotherapy regimen that has dramatically improved the previously dismal prognosis for MOGCTs has been evolving since 1970s. The vincristine, actinomycin D and cyclophosphamide (VAC) regimen was popular in 1970s, but the introduction of cisplatin into clinical trials in the late 1970s made platinum-based combination chemotherapy popular. Currently, the bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) regimen is standard for MOGCTs. In our case, the patient was treated during a period of transition, and we selected the PVP regimen.
Conservative surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy has made preservation of fertility in young patients possible, even in patients with advanced disease, such as the one described here (Gershenson, 1993
). In that regard, there have been several reports of successful pregnancy after treatment with combination chemotherapy (Schwartz and Vidone, 1981
; Yoshinaka et al., 2000
; Zanetta et al., 2001
; Tangir et al., 2003
). For instance, Schwartz and Vidone (1981)
were the first to describe a pregnancy following combination chemotherapy for a mixed germ cell tumour of the ovary; that case was a stage I tumour treated using the VAC regimen. In addition, Tangir et al. (2003)
described three successfully treated cases of advanced mixed germ cell tumour, after which two patients conceived successfully. The treatment regimen they used is unclear, however. Our case differs from those in that ART was employed to achieve a successful IVFembryo transfer pregnancy following combination chemotherapy.
The treatment we used was standard fertility-saving surgery (unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) and adjuvant chemotherapy. The PVP regimen used might be considered old-fashioned, but the patient has survived disease-free for over 10 years and has conceived two babies. Still, the operation and chemotherapy might have caused the adhesion seen in the peritoneal cavity. Our patient required ART because adhesions and peritoneal fluid resulted in infertility by causing mechanical blockade to the Fallopian tubes thus preventing oocyte retrieval (Cheong et al., 2001
). We selected the flare-up protocol because the day 3 FSH level was somewhat high (13.53 mIU/ml), and the patient was thought to be a poor responder (Toth et al., 1996
; Gurgan et al., 1997
). Tewari et al. (1998)
reported the case of a germ cell ovarian cancer arising in the setting of fertility-drug therapy. But the safety issue in using fertility drugs is still controversial. Mahdavi et al. (2006)
reviewed the literature about induction of ovulation and ovarian cancer. The findings on ovarian cancer risk associated with fertility-drug treatment were reassuring but not definitive. Most of these patients who have received combination chemotherapy resume normal ovarian function and can expect a normal fertility rate and healthy offspring. The congenital malformation rate of ovarian cancer patients is slightly higher than that of the normal population, but no significant difference has been observed between patients who received or did not receive chemotherapy.
Low et al. (2000)
reported on 74 patients with malignant germ cell tumours of the ovary who underwent conservative surgery, 47 of whom (64%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Of these, 20 attempted conception and 19 were successful (95%). A total of 16 live births were documented, 14 of which were from chemotherapy group. There were no documented congenital defects in any of the 16 infants. It was not clear how many of these 20 patients had advanced-stage tumours.
Zanetta et al. (2001)
reported on 81 patients who were treated conservatively and received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty patients attempted to conceive, and 16 were successful (80%), compared with 12 of 12 in the group not treated with chemotherapy. There were six patients with advanced disease in this series.
Kanazawa et al. (2000)
reported on 20 patients who underwent conservative surgery for fertility preservation. Eight of 20 patients delivered a total of 9 normal babies with no congenital abnormalities; 7 of 9 babies were from women treated with chemotherapy. One case, who received no chemotherapy, conceived two times. One of these eight patients had stage IIIc disease.
Gershenson (1988)
reported a series of 40 patients with MOGCTs, 16 of whom had attempted to conceive. Nine conceived naturally, and three more did after infertility treatment (75%). Of the 12 patients, 11 patients delivered 22 healthy infants, none of whom had major birth defect. Ten patients in this series had stage III disease. It was not stated how many of these 10 advanced-stage patients attempted or were able to conceive.
Brewer et al. (1999)
reported a series of 16 patients with dysgerminoma who underwent conservative treatment. Three of the 16 who attempted to conceive were successful. Five pregnancies have occurred in this group of patients after chemotherapy. There was no evidence of birth defects.
Zanagnolo et al. (2004)
reported eleven pregnancies occurred in 36 women treated with fertility-sparing surgery who were of childbearing age. Ten women delivered 11 healthy babies; there were no miscarriages. None of these patients had difficulty conceiving, and there was no evidence of birth defects or other disabilities in any of the offspring.
Tangir et al. (2003)
reported on 29 patients who conceived a total of 47 pregnancies. There were 38 children born (including three sets of twins), 10 elective terminations and 2 spontaneous abortions. Eleven patients had one child, eight had two children, two had three children, and one had five children. Follow-up was available for 16 of these children. One child has speech problem. Another child, whose mother was treated with chemotherapy during the third trimester of pregnancy, had juvenile arthritis. This, however, is a prevalent disease in this family. One of a patients twins has problems processing high-order thinking and is currently undergoing future workup. The other 13 children were reported as completely normal at the time of follow-up. The noble aspect of the study is the finding that 8 of 10 women with stage III disease successfully treated with fertility-preserving surgery were able to conceive.
Although spontaneously occurring pregnancies in patients treated in this manner have been reported as above, our case report can be considered to be of sufficient interest because the pregnancy was the first generated through ART. This case may open a way of proceeding for couples presented with the combined problem of MOGCT and severe male infertility where spontaneous conception may not be possible at all.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brewer M, Gershenson DM, Herzog CE, Mitchell MF, Silva EG, Wharton JT. (1999) Outcome and reproductive function after chemotherapy for ovarian dysgerminoma. J Clin Oncol 17:26702675.
Cheong YC, Laird SM, Li TC, Shelton JB, Ledger WL, Cooke ID. (2001) Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation: review. Hum Reprod Update 7:556566.
Gershenson DM. (1988) Menstrual and reproductive function after treatment with combination chemotherapy for malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 6:270275.[Abstract]
Gershenson DM. (1993) Update on malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Cancer 71:Suppl 4, 15811590.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gurgan T, Urman B, Yarali H, Duran HE. (1997) Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 to predict ovarian response in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization using a flare-up protocol. Fertil Steril 68:483487.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kanazawa K, Suzuki T, Sakumoto K. (2000) Treatment of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors with preservation of fertility: reproductive performance after persistent remission. Am J Clin Oncol 23:244248.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kurman RJ. (2002) Blausteins Pathology of the Female Genital Tract 5th edn (SpringerVerlag, New York.).
Low JJ, Perrin LC, Crandon AJ, Hacker NF. (2000) Conservative surgery to preserve ovarian function in patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. A review of 74 cases. Cancer 89:391398.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mahdavi A, Pejovic T, Nezhat F. (2006) Induction of ovulation and ovarian cancer: a critical review of the literature. Fertil Steril 85:819826.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schwartz PE and Vidone RA. (1981) Pregnancy following combination chemotherapy for a mixed germ cell tumor of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 12:373378.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tangir J, Zelterman D, Ma W, Schwartz PE. (2003) Reproductive function after conservative surgery and chemotherapy for malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol 101:251257.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tewari K, Rose GS, Balderston KD, Porto M, Kohler MF. (1998) Fertility drugs and malignant germ-cell tumour of ovary in pregnancy. Lancet 351:957958.[Web of Science][Medline]
Toth TL, Awwad JT, Veeck LL, Jones HW Jr, Muasher SJ. (1996) Suppression and flare regimens of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Use in women with different basal gonadotropin values in an in vitro fertilization program. J Reprod Med 41:321326.[Web of Science][Medline]
Yoshinaka A, Fukasawa I, Sakamoto T, Tanaka M, Ota Y, Inaba N. (2000) The fertility and pregnancy outcomes of the patients who underwent preservative operation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant ovarian tumors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 264:124127.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Zanagnolo V, Sartori E, Galleri G, Pasinetti B, Bianchi U. (2004) Clinical review of 55 cases of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 25:315320.[Web of Science][Medline]
Zanetta G, Bonazzi C, Cantu M, Binidagger S, Locatelli A, Bratina G, Mangioni C. (2001) Survival and reproductive function after treatment of malignant germ cell ovarian tumors. J Clin Oncol 19:10151020.
Submitted on January 25, 2006; resubmitted on July 29, 2006; resubmitted on August 31, 2006; accepted on September 12, 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||