Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on January 4, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(4):1186-1191; doi:10.1093/humrep/del498
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/1186    most recent
del498v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skouby, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Jespersen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skouby, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Jespersen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A comparative study of the effect of continuous combined conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate and tibolone on blood coagulability

Sven O. Skouby1,3, Johannes J. Sidelmann3,5, Lisbeth Nilas2 and Jørgen Jespersen3,4

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frederiksberg Hospital 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 3 Department for Thrombosis Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark 4 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Ribe County Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department for Thrombosis Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, DK-6700 Esbjerg, Denmark. Tel: +4579182415; Fax: +4579182430; E-mail: jsi{at}ribeamt.dk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Hormone therapy (HT) after the menopause is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Tibolone has pharmacodynamic properties different from other hormone preparations. We compared the effect of a combined HT and tibolone on the inhibition of haemostasis.

METHODS: Thirty-eight post-menopausal women were randomly assigned to 1.25 or 2.5 mg per day of tibolone or oral continuous combined conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA). Inhibitors of haemostasis were measured at baseline and after 12 months.

RESULTS: Results from the two groups of women receiving tibolone were not significantly different and, to improve the power of the study, the two groups were merged. Higher concentration of protein S (1.16 versus 1.00 IU ml–1; P = 0.005) and higher activated protein C resistance ratio (APC-R) (4.2 versus 3.65; P = 0.04) were observed in the tibolone group than in the CEE/MPA group. Both doses of tibolone increased APC-R significantly (P < 0.01). Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) was lower in the CEE/MPA group than in the tibolone group (67.8 versus 79.9 ng ml–1; P = 0.03). CEE/MPA reduced the concentration of antithrombin (P = 0.002), protein S (P < 0.001) and TFPI (P < 0.001). Both preparations reduced the concentration of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Tibolone induces fewer pharmacological alterations on blood coagulability than CEE/MPA and has a potentially favourable effect on APC-R. This may translate into a corresponding low risk of VTE, as also indicated from the existing clinical data.

Key words: coagulation/conjugated equine estrogen/medroxyprogesterone acetate/tibolone/venous thromboembolism


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hormone therapy (HT) is associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), as recently reviewed (Lowe, 2004Go). The risk for VTE induced by HT is dependent on the composition of the HT used. Users of estrogen-only preparations have lower risk of VTE than women receiving combined estrogen–progestin preparations (Daly et al., 1996Go; Perez et al., 1997Go; Varas-Lorenzo et al., 1998Go; Rossouw et al., 2002Go; Douketis et al., 2005Go), and also the route of administration seems to be of importance. Women treated with transdermal HT may have lower risk of VTE than women receiving orally administered HT, as demonstrated in a number of clinical studies (Daly et al., 1996Go; Perez et al., 1997Go; Scarabin et al., 2003Go). Genetic and pharmacological factors may contribute to the precipitation of VTE among HT users. We have previously shown that the pharmacological alterations induced by HT on the haemostatic system may be of particular interest (Bladbjerg et al., 2002Go; Sidelmann et al., 2003Go) because HT changes the inhibitory potential of coagulation as well as fibrinolysis significantly, as also shown by others (Hoibraaten et al., 2001Go; Salobir et al., 2002Go). Consequently, HT may increase the risk of VTE in thrombosis-prone individuals. Tibolone is a synthetic steroid compound with estrogen, progestogen and weak androgen activity. Tibolone has specific effects on different tissues due to tissue-selective metabolism, enzyme regulation and/or receptor binding and activation. It is, therefore, referred to as a selective tissue estrogenic activity regulator. As well as relieving vasomotor symptoms, tibolone has positive effects on sexual well-being and mood and improves vaginal atrophy and urogenital symptoms. Prevention of bone loss with tibolone is comparable with that seen with estrogen alone and combined HT. Tibolone rarely causes endometrial proliferation, and no additional progestogen is required. Phase 2 and 3 studies have indicated that tibolone may not induce increased risk of VTE (Peverill, 2003Go), but only few clinical trials have addressed the VTE risk of tibolone (Daly et al., 1996Go; Jackson, 2001Go). On the other hand, a number of studies have focused on the effect of tibolone on some of the inhibitors of the haemostatic system (Walker et al., 1985Go; Cortes-Prieto, 1987Go; Parkin et al., 1987Go; van Wersch et al., 1994Go; Bjarnason et al., 1997Go; Winkler et al., 2000Go; Norris et al., 2002Go; Koh et al., 2003Go, 2005Go; Osmanagaoglu et al., 2005Go), and it has been suggested that tibolone has a favourable effect on fibrinolysis (van Wersch et al., 1994Go; Bjarnason et al., 1997Go; Winkler et al., 2000Go; Norris et al., 2002Go; Koh et al., 2003Go, 2005Go), whereas other studies indicate that tibolone has less effect on the inhibitors of coagulation than observed with other HT preparations (Winkler et al., 2000Go; Koh et al., 2003Go). The present study, however, is the first to make a thorough comparison of the effect of continuous combined conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA) and tibolone on the inhibitory system of both coagulation and fibrinolysis.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The study population consisted of 38 healthy women 45–65 years old. All women had intact uterus and they were post-menopausal, defined as (i) amenorrhoeic for at least 1 year and (ii) amenorrhoeic for at least 6 months with serum estradiol (E2) ≤20 pg ml–1 and FSH ≥40 IU 1–1. In cases of previous HT use, appropriate washout periods required before drawing blood for E2 and FSH determinations were as follows: 4 weeks for transdermal HT or local estrogen; 8 weeks for phytoestrogens, tibolone, intrauterine or oral progesterone and oral estrogen/progesterone therapy; 6 months for progesterone implants or injections or estrogen/progesterone implants or injections. Inclusion criteria were menopause for less than 15 years, atrophic or inactive endometrium at the screening biopsy and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18 and ≤32 kg m–2.

The women were randomized in a 1:1:2 ratio to oral tibolone 1.25 mg per day (n = 10), tibolone 2.5 mg per day (n = 10) or oral CEE plus MPA (0.625 mg + 2.5 mg per day) (n = 18) for a 12-month treatment period.

Blood sampling
Citrate-stabilized venous blood samples were drawn at baseline and after 12 months of treatment. Blood was collected after 10 min of standardized resting and after at least 12 h of fasting and non-smoking. Minimal stasis was applied, and the samples were drawn in evacuated Hemogard 9NC tubes from Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, UK. The samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 20 min at room temperature. Plasma was collected and stored at – 65°C. Prior to analyses, the plasma samples were thawed at 37°C, stored at room temperature and analysed within 30 min.

Blood analysis
Activated protein C resistance ratio (APC-R) was determined with the Coatest APC Resistance kit from Chromogenix, Mölndal, Sweden. The assay was performed with the ACL 7000 from International Laboratories, Milan, Italy. This equipment was also used for determination of the activities of antithrombin and protein C, employing the coamatic antithrombin and the coamatic protein C kits, both from Chromogenix. The protein concentration of total protein S was determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), employing antibodies from DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark. The protein concentration of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) was determined with the Asserachrom TFPI kit from Diagnostica Stago, Asniéres-sur-Seine, France. The protein concentration of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) was determined with the TintElize PAI-1 kit from Biopool, Umeå, Sweden, whereas thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) was determined by an ELISA employing antibodies from Affinity Biologicals, Ancaster, ON, Canada.

The assay procedures were calibrated against World Health Organization International Biological Standards and reference materials when available. Antithrombin was calibrated against International Standard 93/768, protein C against International Standard 86/622, protein S against International Standard 93/590 and PAI-1 was calibrated against International Standard 92/654. All standards were provided by National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls, Potters Bar, UK. The TFPI assay was calibrated against standards provided by the manufacturer of the kit, and the TAFI assay was calibrated against an in-house collected pool obtained from 30 healthy persons not receiving HT.

Statistics
Non-parametric statistical methods were used because of non-Gaussian distribution of results. All statistical evaluations were performed with the SigmaStat program from Systat Software Inc. Richmond, CA, USA. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Within group comparisons
Comparison between the results obtained at baseline and those obtained after 12 months of treatment was performed with Wilcoxon's signed ranks test.

Between group comparisons
For each quantity, the Kruskall–Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks was used to compare the results obtained in the treatment groups at baseline. Further comparison between the tibolone group and the CEE/MPA group was performed both for the baseline results and for the results obtained after 12 months of treatment with the Mann–Whitney rank sum test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Initially, we compared the results obtained in the group of women receiving 1.25 mg per day of tibolone with the results from the group receiving 2.5 mg per day. No significant differences were obtained either at baseline or after 12 months of treatment (data not shown). Thus, in order to improve the power of the study, the two groups were merged, and the results of the combined tibolone group were compared with the results obtained in the CEE/MPA group.

The women in the CEE/MPA group and the tibolone group were comparable with respect to age (median age 55.4 versus 54.0 years, respectively, P = 0.39), height (median height 1.68 versus 1.66 m, respectively, P = 0.27), weight (median weight 66.5 kg in both groups, P = 0.60), BMI (median BMI 24.0 versus 25.1 kg m–2, respectively, P = 0.76) and time since menopause (44 versus 37 months, respectively, P = 0.99) (Figure 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Characteristics of the 38 post-menopausal women who were assigned to tibolone or oral continuous combined conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA). Data are presented as median and 25–75 percentile ranges.

 
The within-group comparisons showed that treatment for 12 months with CEE/MPA reduced the concentration of antithrombin from 1.02 to 0.95 IU ml–1, P = 0.002, the concentration of total protein S was reduced from 1.17 to 1.00 IU ml–1, P < 0.001 (Figure 2). TFPI was reduced from 81.6 to 67.8 ng/ml, P < 0.001, and PAI-1 antigen decreased from 18.5 to 15.6 ng ml–1, P = 0.048 (Figure 2B). APC-R, protein C and TAFI were unaffected by the treatment with CEE/MPA (Figure 2A and B).


Figure 2
Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. (A) Results of the analysis of plasma taken from post-menopausal women before (baseline) or after 12 months of treatment with CEE/MPA (black dots) or tibolone (white dots). (B) TFPI, tissue factor pathway inhibitor; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1; TAFI, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor.

 
Treatment for 12 months with tibolone reduced the concentration of protein C from 1.13 to 1.09 IU ml–1, P = 0.004 (Figure 2)A, and the concentration of PAI-1 decreased from 16.3 to 11.2 ng ml–1, P = 0.006 (Figure 2B). Tibolone induced a very pronounced increase in the APC-R from 3.85 at baseline to 4.20 after 12 months of treatment, P < 0.001 (Figure 2A). Antithrombin, protein S, TFPI and TAFI were unaffected by the treatment with tibolone (Figure 2A and B).

The between-group comparisons performed at baseline revealed no significant differences in any of the biochemical quantities investigated (Figure 2A and B).

The between-group comparisons performed after 12 months of treatment showed that the APC-R was significantly higher in the tibolone group than in the CEE/MPA group (4.20 versus 3.65), P = 0.04. The concentration of protein S was significantly lower in the CEE/MPA group (1.00 IU ml–1) than in the tibolone group (1.16 IU ml–1), P = 0.005 (Figure 2A), and also the concentration of TFPI was lower in the CEE/MPA group (67.8 ng ml–1) than in the tibolone group (79.9 ng ml–1), P = 0.03 (Figure 2B). The other quantities investigated showed no statistical significant differences after 12 months of treatment (Figure 2A and B).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The effects of HT on the haemostatic system were carefully addressed at The Writing Group for the 3rd European Conference on Sex Steroids and Cardiovascular Diseases (2003)Go. Here, it was concluded that since no single test or algorithm is currently able to detect a future thrombosis, haemostatic variables may continue to be used as relevant pharmacological risk markers for the effects of HTs on coagulation. It was furthermore recommended to use the type and dose of the preparations which cause the least change or no change in haemostatic risk markers. After oral administration, tibolone is rapidly absorbed and converted by the liver into two estrogenic metabolites (3{alpha}- and 3beta-OH-tibolone), which bind to the estrogen receptor, and a third metabolite ({delta}4-isomer), which demonstrates binding to the progesterone and androgen receptors. Thus, the pharmacokinetic of tibolone is different from that of CEE/MPA, and it is therefore of interest to study the pharmacodynamics of the two preparations and how it might translate into different clinical profiles.

To provide insight into the haemostatic risk profile of tibolone, we have performed a thorough evaluation of the effect of tibolone on the inhibitory potential of haemostasis and compared this effect with the effect induced by CEE/MPA, the HT formulation used in the Women's Health Initiative study (Rossouw et al., 2002Go). We demonstrate that the effect of tibolone on the inhibitory potential of coagulation is independent of the dosage used, i.e. 1.25 versus 2.5 mg per day, confirming the study of Bjarnason et al. (1997Go), and the results in the two groups of women treated with tibolone were combined to improve the power of the study. We have previously shown that various oral combined HT regimens alter the inhibitory mechanisms of coagulation significantly (Bladbjerg et al., 2002Go, 2003Go; Sidelmann et al., 2003Go), and the specific effect of CEE/MPA on inhibition of haemostasis has been addressed in a number of studies (Nozaki et al., 1999Go; Lobo et al., 2001Go; Koh et al., 2003Go; Osmanagaoglu et al., 2005Go; Sumino et al., 2005Go). In accordance with these studies, we presently demonstrate that treatment with CEE/MPA decreases the concentration of antithrombin, protein S and PAI-1, whereas the concentration of protein C is unaffected by the treatment. In addition, we demonstrate that CEE/MPA, as other combined oral HT preparations (Hoibraaten et al., 2001Go; Bladbjerg et al., 2002Go, 2003Go), reduces the concentration of TFPI significantly, but is without effect on the APC-R.

The concentration of TAFI is unaffected by both CEE/MPA and tibolone, as shown for other HT preparations (Bladbjerg et al., 2003Go), and tibolone causes a decrease in the concentration of PAI-1 comparable with that induced by CEE/MPA, as previously demonstrated (van Wersch et al., 1994Go; Bjarnason et al., 1997Go; Winkler et al., 2000Go; Norris et al., 2002Go; Koh et al., 2003Go, 2005Go). In contrast to other studies (Winkler et al., 2000Go; Osmanagaoglu et al., 2005Go), we observe a small, but significant, decrease in the concentration of protein C. However, the effect of tibolone on the inhibition of coagulation is much less pronounced than that of CEE/MPA because tibolone does not affect the concentration of antithrombin, protein S and TFPI—proteins representing the three major inhibitory pathways of coagulation. The lacking effect of tibolone on TFPI may be of particular importance, as all other combined HT preparations studied so far reduce the concentration of TFPI significantly (Hoibraaten et al., 2001Go; Bladbjerg et al., 2002Go, 2003Go), and reduced concentration of TFPI is associated with increased risk of thrombosis (Amini-Nekoo et al., 2001Go; Dahm et al., 2003Go; Hoke et al., 2005Go). The analysis of APC-R provides insight into the effect of APC on the coagulation system. Some HT preparations have the capacity to reduce APC-R (Sidelmann et al., 2003Go), which is coherent with an increased resistance towards the inhibitory effect of APC. This condition is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis (Rosen and Sturk, 1997Go). However, tibolone shows, also in this respect, a unique pharmacological quality, as we demonstrate a very significant increase in APC-R in the women treated with tibolone, confirming the study of Winkler et al. (2000)Go. Taken together, the present study shows that tibolone induces fewer pharmacological alterations of the inhibitory potential of haemostasis than those observed with CEE/MPA and other conventional combined HT therapy, i.e. no effect on antithrombin, protein S and TFPI and a potentially favourable effect on APC-R.

We recognize that the present study is limited by the rather low number of women included and the lack of a control group of placebo-treated women, and a large randomized placebo-controlled study would have been the optimal design. Despite these limitations, the present study, however, confirms that the modest pharmacological effect of tibolone on the haemostatic system translates into a corresponding low clinical risk of VTE, as reported in the few clinical studies performed so far (Daly et al., 1996Go; Jackson, 2001Go).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Amini-Nekoo A, Futers TS, Moia M, Mannucci PM, Grant PJ, Ariens RA. (2001) Analysis of the tissue factor pathway inhibitor gene and antigen levels in relation to venous thrombosis. Br J Haematol 113:537–543.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bjarnason NH, Bjarnason K, Haarbo J, Bennink HJ, Christiansen C. (1997) Tibolone: influence on markers of cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1752–1756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bladbjerg EM, Skouby SO, Andersen LF, Jespersen J. (2002) Effects of different progestin regimens in hormone replacement therapy on blood coagulation factor VII and tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Hum Reprod 17:3235–3241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bladbjerg EM, Madsen JS, Kristensen SR, Abrahamsen B, Brixen K, Mosekilde L, Jespersen J. (2003) Effect of long-term hormone replacement therapy on tissue factor pathway inhibitor and thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor in healthy postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled study. J Thromb Haemost 1:1208–1214.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cortes-Prieto J. (1987) Coagulation and fibrinolysis in post-menopausal women treated with Org OD 14. Maturitas (Suppl 1), 67–72.

Dahm A, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Bendz B, Rosendaal F, Bertina RM, Sandset PM. (2003) Low levels of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) increase the risk of venous thrombosis. Blood 101:4387–4392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Daly E, Vessey MP, Hawkins MM, Carson JL, Gough P, Marsh S. (1996) Risk of venous thromboembolism in users of hormone replacement therapy. Lancet 348:977–980.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Douketis JD, Julian JA, Kearon C, Anderson DR, Crowther MA, Bates SM, Barone M, Piovella F, Turpie AG, Middeldorp S, et al. (2005) Does the type of hormone replacement therapy influence the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A prospective case-control study. J Thromb Haemost 3:943–948.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hoibraaten E, Qvigstad E, Andersen TO, Mowinckel MC, Sandset PM. (2001) The effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on hemostatic variables in women with previous venous thromboembolism—results from a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. Thromb Haemost 85:775–781.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hoke M, Kyrle PA, Minar E, Bialonzcyk C, Hirschl M, Schneider B, Kollars M, Weltermann A, Eichinger S. (2005) Tissue factor pathway inhibitor and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 94:787–790.[Web of Science][Medline]

Jackson G. (2001) Tibolone and the cardiovascular system. Eur Heart J 3 Suppl M17–M21.

Koh KK, Ahn JY, Jin DK, Yoon BK, Kim HS, Kim DS, Kang WC, Han SH, Choi IS, Shin EK. (2003) Significant differential effects of hormone therapy or tibolone on markers of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23:1889–1894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Koh KK, Han SH, Shin MS, Ahn JY, Lee Y, Shin EK. (2005) Significant differential effects of lower doses of hormone therapy or tibolone on markers of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Eur Heart J 26:1362–1368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lobo RA, Bush T, Carr BR, Pickar JH. (2001) Effects of lower doses of conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate on plasma lipids and lipoproteins, coagulation factors, and carbohydrate metabolism. Fertil Steril 76:13–24.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lowe GD. (2004) Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease: increased risks of venous thromboembolism and stroke, and no protection from coronary heart disease. J Intern Med 256:361–374.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Norris LA, Joyce M, O'Keeffe N, Sheppard BL, Bonnar J. (2002) Haemostatic risk factors in healthy postmenopausal women taking hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas 43:125–133.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nozaki M, Ogata R, Koera K, Hashimoto K, Nakano H. (1999) Changes in coagulation factors and fibrinolytic components of postmenopausal women receiving continuous hormone replacement therapy. Climacteric 2:124–130.[Medline]

Osmanagaoglu MA, Osmanagaoglu S, Osmanagaoglu T, Okumus B, Bozkaya H. (2005) Effect of different preparations of hormone therapy on lipid and glucose metabolism, coagulation factors, and bone mineral density in overweight and obese postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 84:384–393.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Parkin DE, Smith D, Al Azzawi F, Lindsay R, Hart DM. (1987) Effects of long-term Org OD 14 administration on blood coagulation in climacteric women. Maturitas 9:95–101.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Perez GS, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Castellsague J, Duque OA. (1997) Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: population based case–control study. BMJ 314:796–800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Peverill RE. (2003) Hormone therapy and venous thromboembolism. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 17:149–164.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rosen SB and Sturk A. (1997) Activated protein C resistance—a major risk factor for thrombosis. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 35:501–516.[Web of Science][Medline]

Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, et al. (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:321–333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salobir BG, Keber I, Vrabic L. (2002) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the effects of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy on coagulation and fibrinolytic systems in healthy postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 78:1178–1183.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Scarabin PY, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G. (2003) Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet 362:428–432.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sidelmann JJ, Jespersen J, Andersen LF, Skouby SO. (2003) Hormone replacement therapy and hypercoagulability. Results from the Prospective Collaborative Danish Climacteric Study. BJOG 110:541–547.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sumino H, Ichikawa S, Sawada Y, Sakamoto H, Kumakura H, Takayama Y, Sakamaki T, Kurabayashi M. (2005) Effects of hormone replacement therapy on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in hypertensive and normotensive postmenopausal women. Thromb Res 115:359–366.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

The Writing Group for the 3rd European Conference on Sex Steroids and Cardiovascular Diseases. (2003) The European Consensus Development Conference 2002: Sex Steroids and Cardiovascular Diseases. On the route to combined evidence from OC and HRT/ERT. Maturitas 44:69–82.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Varas-Lorenzo C, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Cattaruzzi C, Troncon MG, Agostinis L, Perez-Gutthann S. (1998) Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of hospitalization for venous thromboembolism: a population-based study in southern Europe. Am J Epidemiol 147:387–390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walker ID, Davidson JF, Richards A, Yates R, McEwan HP. (1985) The effect of the synthetic steroid Org OD14 on fibrinolysis and blood lipids in postmenopausal women. Thromb Haemost 53:303–305.[Web of Science][Medline]

van Wersch JW, Ubachs JM, van den Ende A, van Enk A. (1994) The effect of two regimens of hormone replacement therapy on the haemostatic profile in postmenopausal women. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 32:449–453.[Web of Science][Medline]

Winkler UH, Altkemper R, Kwee B, Helmond FA, Coelingh Bennink HJ. (2000) Effects of tibolone and continuous combined hormone replacement therapy on parameters in the clotting cascade: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. Fertil Steril 74:10–19.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Submitted on September 14, 2006; resubmitted on November 23, 2006; accepted on December 5, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/1186    most recent
del498v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skouby, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Jespersen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skouby, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Jespersen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?