Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on May 16, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(7):1942-1945; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem116
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/7/1942    most recent
dem116v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansour, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Aboulghar, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansour, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Aboulghar, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Sperm suspension is a highly ultrasonically visible material: a novel model to study uterine activity

Ragaa T. Mansour1, Hesham G. Al-Inany, Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, Latona Murad, Gamal I. Serour and Mohamed A. Aboulghar

The Egyptian IVF-ET Center, 3 Street 161, Hadayek El-Maadi, Cairo 11431, Egypt

1 Correspondence address. Fax: +202-5253532. E-mail: ivf{at}link.net


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to find an ultrasonically echogenic material to study the uterine activity, and to test whether closing the vaginal speculum on the cervix prevents the displacement of the injected material.

METHODS: A concentrated sperm suspension was used as an ultrasonically visible material. Forty-five women undergoing intrauterine insemination were randomized into: open speculum group (n = 23) and closed speculum group (n = 22). Mimicking embryo transfer, 50 ul of concentrated sperm suspension was injected intrauterine while the vaginal speculum was open in 23 patients. In the other group, the two blades of the vaginal speculum were closed on the cervix, then 50 ul of concentrated sperm suspension was injected. The ultrasonically visible material was observed in the uterine cavity for 10 min during which the procedure was video-recorded.

RESULTS: The injected sperm suspension was clearly visible in all cases. In the closed speculum group, the echogenic droplet remained in the upper uterine segment in 18 cases (82%) and moved towards the lower uterine segment in six cases (18%). In the open speculum group, the echogenic droplet remained in the upper uterine segment in only six cases (26%) and it moved towards the lower uterine segment and passed through the cervical canal in 17 cases (74%).

CONCLUSIONS: For the first time in the medical literature, a concentrated sperm suspension was used as an ultrasonographically visible material to study uterine activity. Closing the portio-vaginalis of the cervix prevents the displacement of the injected material.

Key words: embryo transfer/ultrasound/echogenic material/intrauterine insemination/sperm suspension


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The initiation of uterine contractions after embryo transfer that leads to the immediate or delayed expulsion of the embryos is considered one of the major factors that limit the success rates after IVF. It has been demonstrated that about 15% of the embryos are expelled after transfer (Poindexter et al., 1986Go) and about 42% of the injected dye in a mock embryo transfer is extruded (Kuntzen et al., 1992;Go Mansour et al., 1994Go).

An attempt was made by our team to prevent the expulsion of the embryos from the uterine cavity after embryo transfer by applying a gentle mechanical pressure on the portio-vaginalis of the cervix using the vaginal speculum (Mansour, 2005Go). It is a simple modification of the embryo transfer technique, yet it significantly improves the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. However, the study did not demonstrate why the higher pregnancy rate was obtained. Only a methodological approach looking at the outcome of mock embryo transfer demonstrating the displacement of markers following occlusion or no occlusion of the cervix might give an explanation. In the present study, we aimed to investigate further using ultrasonographically visible material to explain the mechanism of action of this technique. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time in the medical literature that washed, concentrated spermatozoa have been used as an ultrasonically visible material.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients included in the study were infertile couples undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) for unexplained and mild male factor infertility at the Egyptian IVF-ET Center. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the institutional review board. The patients were counselled that the study does not change any protocol or methodology of the IUI they were scheduled for. They were told that the IUI was going to be done under abdominal ultrasound guidance of the catheter and that there would be an extra 10 min before the IUI procedure to study uterine activity.

Procedure
All of the patients were subjected to transvaginal folliculometry to follow up the size of the leading follicle until it reached ≥ 18 mm. IUI was timed 34 h after hCG injection. The semen was prepared on the day of insemination using the swim-up technique as described previously (Mansour et al., 1989Go).

All patients were placed in the lithotomy position, no anaesthesia was used. After visualizing the portio-vaginalis of the cervix using Cusco's speculum, the cervix was cleaned using sterile gauze. Insemination was done using a sterile Wallace catheter (1816 N, HG; Wallace Ltd, Colchester, UK) to mimic the embryo transfer procedure (Mansour, 2005Go). The catheter was attached to a 1 ml tuberculin syringe and filled with 0.5 ml of a processed washed and concentrated sperm suspension.

In the study group (n = 22), after introducing the catheter, the screw of the vaginal speculum was loosened so that its two blades would close gently on the portio-vaginalis of the cervix. After waiting for about 1–2 min, only 50 ul was injected into the uterine cavity. The catheter was then withdrawn slowly and the vaginal speculum was left in place pressing on the cervix after withdrawal of the catheter for 10 min before removal. The procedure was monitored for 10 min and video recorded for documentation and further evaluation using abdominal ultrasound (Medison 9900, Kretz, Austria).

In the control group (n = 23), the same procedure as in the study group was followed, but no loosening of the screw of the vaginal speculum to close on the portio-vaginalis was done. The speculum was kept open and was removed after withdrawal of the catheter. Monitoring by ultrasound was performed for 10 min and video recorded for further evaluation.

In both groups, after completing the experiment and recording, the rest of the sperm suspension (0.5 ml) was then slowly injected as in a routine IUI. The patients were allowed to rest in bed for 15–30 min then go home.

The primary outcome measure was observing the location of the injected material in the upper uterine cavity and recording its passage to the lower uterine segment and through the cervical canal. For this small pilot study, findings were compared using Chi-square test and results are presented as Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The sperm suspension was clearly visible in all cases. In the closed speculum group, the echogenic injected droplet remained in the upper uterine segment in 18 cases (82%) and moved towards the lower uterine segment in six cases (18%) (Fig. 1). In the open speculum group, the echogenic droplet remained in the upper uterine segment in only six cases (26%) and it moved towards the lower uterine segment (Fig. 2) and passed through the cervical canal in 17 cases (74%) [OR = 12.75, 95%, CI = 3.1–53.2 (P < 0.0003)].


Figure 1
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1: Speculum closed: the single arrow points to the ultrasonically visible concentrated sperm suspension in the upper uterine cavity; the two arrows point to the blades of the speculum pressing on the portio-vaginalis of the cervix

 

Figure 2
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2: Speculum open: the single arrow points to the ultrasonically visible concentrated sperm suspension moving to the lower uterine cavity; the two arrows point to the opened blades of the speculum

 
Fine peristaltic movements were observed moving the ultrasonically visible droplets. In the closed speculum group, the direction of the movements was from the lower to the upper uterine segment. In two cases the echogenic droplets moved towards the lower uterine segments, then it was pushed again upwards towards the fundus. In the open speculum group most of the movements of the echogenic droplets were towards the lower segment and the cervix.

The whole amount of sperm suspension was then injected for IUI, and Fig. 3 shows the echogenic droplet in the fundus and Fig. 4 shows the echogenic sperm suspension filling the whole cavity.


Figure 3
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3: Speculum closed: transverse section of the uterus with the ultrasonically visible concentrated sperm suspension in the fundus

 

Figure 4
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4: Speculum opened longitudinal section of the uterus showing the ultrasonically visible concentrated sperm suspension in the whole cavity (volume injected 0.2 ml)

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The immediate or delayed expulsion of embryos after transferring them into the uterine cavity has always been a major concern in assisted reproduction (Harper et al., 1961Go; Menezo et al., 1985Go; Poindexter et al., 1986Go; Schulman, 1986Go; Meldrum et al., 1987Go). In two different studies mimicking embryo transfer, one using a radio opaque dye (Knutzen et al., 1992Go) and the other using a methylene blue dye (Mansour et al., 1994Go), it was found that the dye was extruded from the uterine cavity in 42% of the cases. Using artificial dyed embryos for training in IVF, it was also found that only 45% of the embryos were present within the uterine cavity 1 h after the transfer (Menezo et al., 1985Go). It has also been observed that after embryo transfer, the embryos can just as easily move towards the cervical canal as towards the Fallopian tubes (Woolcott and Stanger, 1997Go, 1998).

These findings from previous studies have raised concerns about the possibility of losing embryos after the embryo transfer, and inspired us to develop a technique to reduce embryo expulsion after embryo transfer by applying gentle pressure on the portio-vaginalis of the cervix using the vaginal speculum (Mansour, 2005Go). However, our previous study did not provide a mechanism by which the higher pregnancy rate was obtained using this modified technique. Only a methodological approach looking at the outcome of mock embryo transfer demonstrating displacement of the markers following the occlusion or no occlusion of the cervix might provide an explanation. The improvement in the results in our previous study (Mansour, 2005Go) may have resulted from phenomena not directly linked to attempting to occlude the cervix, and therefore the present study was performed. The results of this new study indicate that the gentle mechanical closing of the portio-vaginalis of the cervix using the vaginal speculum prevents extrusion of the injected material inside the uterine cavity to the cervical canal. In addition, this is the first study in the medical literature that demonstrates the echogenecity of washed, concentrated sperm suspension and its possible detection under ultrasound guidance. This finding by itself will be of value for using it for any further experimental study to evaluate uterine contractions. It is a very simple idea because concentrated sperm suspension is highly echogenic as well as safe and economic and any study can be done during IUI.

In semen processing for IUI, the sample is washed twice with tissue culture media. After centrifugation, the supernatant is discarded, while the pellet is resuspended in tissue culture media. This technique is suggested to remove the seminal plasma and its various contents of prostaglandins. The prostaglandins content of the washed sperm suspension had an insignificant effect on contractility (Sinnemaa et al., 2005Go).

In our search for an ultrasonographically visible material to be injected inside the uterine cavity, it was found that Lesny et al. (1998)Go used echovist material. We tried to obtain it but it is not available in Egypt. It was also found that de Ziegler et al. (2003)Go used an ultrasonically visible material to study the uterine activity but unfortunately the composition of the material was not mentioned.

The mechanical theory of occluding the cervix is supported by other investigators who used the speculum to prevent fluid regurgitation from the cervix in Fallopian sperm perfusion (Mamas, 1996Go). The idea of using the vaginal speculum to press on the portio-vaginalis of the cervix originally came from our observation during IUI. We have always observed that some of the injected sperm suspension regurgitated from the cervix after injection and we modified our IUI technique by loosening the screw of the vaginal speculum after introducing the IUI catheter and before injecting the sperm suspension. When the valves of the speculum closed on the portio-vaginalis, the injected fluid did not escape through the cervix. The change in the uterocervical angle due to the release of the speculum may be another added factor for explaining this improvement.

The presence of subendometrial peristaltic movement was described by Birnholz et al., 1984)Go. Endometrial wave-like activity was observed in 71% of spontaneous cycles and 91% of stimulated cycles and their direction from cervix to fundus usually benefits implantation (Ijland et al., 1998Go, 1999Go). In our study group (closed speculum), the echogenic droplets moved in a wave-like movement in the direction from cervix to fundus.

In conclusion, this is the first time in the medical literature that concentrated sperm suspension has been used as a highly echogenic material that can be detected with ultrasound. The study provided evidence that pressing the portio-vaginalis of the cervix with the two blades of the vaginal speculum prevents the extrusion of injected material in the uterine cavity.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Birnholz JC. Related ultrasonic visualization of endometrial movements. Fertil Steril (1984) 41:157–158.[Web of Science][Medline]

Harper MJK, Bennett JP, Rowson LE. A possible explanation for the failure of non-surgical ovum transfer in the cow. Nature (1961) 190:789–790.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ijland MM, Evers JL, Dunselman GA, Hoogland HJ. Endometrial wavelike activity, endometrial thickness, and ultrasound texture in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril (1998) 70:279–283.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ijland MM, Hoogland HJ, Dunselman GA, Lo CR, Evers JL. Endometrial wave direction switch and the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril (1999) 71:476–481.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Knutzen V, Stratton CJ, Sher G, McNamee PI, Huang TT, Soto-Albors C. Mock embryo transfer in early luteal phase, the cycle before in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a descriptive study. Fertil Steril (1992) 57:156–162.[Web of Science][Medline]

Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J, Maguiness SD. Embryo transfer – can we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone contractions? Hum Reprod (1998) 13:1540–1546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mamas L. Higher pregnancy rates with a simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion, using the cervical clamp double nut bivalve speculum in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod (1996) 11:2618–2622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mansour RT. Minimizing embryo expulsion after embryo transfer: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod (2005) 20:170–174.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mansour RT. Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Amin YM. Dummy embryo transfer using methylene blue dye. Hum Reprod (1994) 9:1257–1259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mansour RT, Serour GI, Aboulghar MA. Intrauterine insemination with washed capacitated sperm cells in the treatment of male factor, cervical factor and unexplained infertility. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynecol (1989) 15:151–154.[Medline]

Meldrum DR, Chetkowski R, Steingold KA, de Ziegler D, Cedars MI, Hamilton M. Evolution of a highly successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril (1987) 48:86–93.[Web of Science][Medline]

Menezo Y, Anker D, Salat-Baroux J. Conception and realization of artificial dyed embryos for training in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF and ET). Acta Eur Fertil (1985) 16:55–58.[Medline]

Poindexter AN III, Thompson DJ, Gibbons WE, Findley WE, Dodson MG, Young RL. Residual embryos in failed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril (1986) 46:262–267.[Web of Science][Medline]

Schulman JD. Delayed expulsion of transfer fluid after IVF/ET. Lancet (1986) 1:44.[Web of Science][Medline]

Sinnemaa L, Jarvimaa T, Lehmonen N, Makela O, Reilas T, Sankari S, Katila T. Effect of insemination volume on uterine contractions and inflammatory response and on elimination of semen in the mare uterus-scintigraphic and ultrasonographic studies. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med (2005) 52:466–471.[Web of Science][Medline]

Woolcott R, Stanger J. Potentially important variables identified by transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. Hum Reprod (1997) 12:963–966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Woolcott R, Stanger J. Ultrasound tracking of the movement of embryo-associated air bubbles on standing after transfer. Hum Reprod (1998) 13:2107–2109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

de Ziegler D. Contrast ultrasound of uterine cavity made easy and practical through a novel phase-shifting, contrast-enhancing medium. Fertil Steril (2003) 80((Suppl 3)):13.

Submitted on December 18, 2006; resubmitted on February 21, 2007; accepted on April 3, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/7/1942    most recent
dem116v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansour, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Aboulghar, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansour, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Aboulghar, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?