Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muggleton-Harris, A.L.
Right arrow Articles by Wall, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Muggleton-Harris, A.L.
Right arrow Articles by Wall, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 183-192, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Genetic diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction and fluorescent in-situ hybridization analysis of biopsied cells from both the cleavage and blastocyst stages of individual cultured human preimplantation embryos

A.L. Muggleton-Harris1,2, A.M. Glazier1, S. Pickering3 and M. Wall1

1 Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UMDS, St Thomas's Hospital Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH 3 Department of Anatomy, Cambridge University Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK

Correspondence: 2To whom correspondence should be addressed

Cultured human preimplantation embryos have been used to develop methods which allow preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) analyses by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) on biopsied blastomeres and trophectoderm cells from the same embryo. An experimental design is described and experiments undertaken, which demonstrate the feasibility of extending biopsy and PGD procedures currently in use. We have shown that dual-stage biopsies are possible, and that the PCR and FISH analyses of the biopsied cell samples are effective. One to two blastomeres were biopsied from an 8- to 10-cell embryo and processed for the simultaneous PCR amplification of a β-globin and a cytosine adenine (CA) repeat sequence, or a Y chromosome sequence. FISH procedures were also used to detect the presence of Y chromosome markers. The biopsied cleavage-stage embryo can be cultured to the blastocyst stage, where the serial biopsy of three to five mural trophectoderm cells provides two further cell samples. These can be used to repeat and/or undertake additional PGD analyses. The biopsied blastocyst is either used to confirm earlier diagnoses, or placed in culture for a further 4–24 h. Maintenance of a blastocoele cavity, hatching and formation of an outgrowth demonstrates continuing viability following the dual-stage biopsy procedures. The PCR DNA amplification procedures are effective at the cellular level for both biopsied blastomeres and mural trophectoderm cells. The FISH techniques have shown a definitive Y signal in 50% (one out of two) and 100% (two out of two) of the biopsied blastomeres and 72% (two out of three, four out of five and 7 out of 10) for the trophectoderm cell nuclei. Preliminary experiments have demonstrated that the FISH preparations can be re-amplified to improve the signal, and dual fluorescent procedures using the X and Y probes are effective. A retrospective PCR analysis has also been undertaken on preparations of biopsied cells which were previously used for PGD analysis by FISH.

Key words: blastomeres and trophectoderm/dual-stage biopsy/multiple cell samples/PCR and FISH analyses/preimplantation human embryo

Submitted on July 8, 1994; accepted on October 27, 1994.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. R. Trimarchi, L. Liu, D. M. Porterfield, P. J.S. Smith, and D. L. Keefe
Oxidative Phosphorylation-Dependent and -Independent Oxygen Consumption by Individual Preimplantation Mouse Embryos
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2000; 62(6): 1866 - 1874.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.