Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richard S., L.
Right arrow Articles by Mark V., S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richard S., L.
Right arrow Articles by Mark V., S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 12, pp. 3293-3296, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Association of early {beta}-human chorionic gonadotrophin values with pregnancy wastage and multiple implantation in a donor oocyte programme*

Legro Richard S.1,4, Paulson Richard J.2, Lobo Rogerio A.3 and Sauer Mark V.3

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pennsylvania State University M.S.Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California/Women's Hospital Los Angeles, CA 90033 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University of Physicians and Surgeons 622 West 168th Street, PH-16, New York, NY 10032, USA

Correspondence: 4To whom correspondence should be addressed

An early marker predictive of a viable pregnancy would ease the anxiety associated with positive pregnancy tests after the use of donor oocytes. We examined the predictive value of an early serum quantitative human chorionic gonadotrophin (Q-HCG) concentration on pregnancy outcome following oocyte donation. Embryo transfers after oocyte donation resulting in a positive serum {beta}-HCG were examined beginning 9 days after embryo transfer from those samples assayed in our laboratory (n = 77). Q-HCG concentrations were measured in our laboratory by an immunoradiometric assay utilizing the first International Reference Preparation. Implantations were defined as the number of gestational sacs visualized by transvaginal ultrasound 21 days after embryo transfer. Biochemical pregnancies were those with transient elevations in {beta}-HCG concentration but without implantation sites. Spontaneous abortions were characterized by an implantation site with the eventual arrest of development. Ongoing/delivered pregnancies developed appropriately and proceeded beyond the first trimester. Day 9 Q-HCG concentrations did not differentiate between biochemical pregnancies/spontaneous abortions and ongoing/delivered pregnancies, although mean ± SD concentrations for biochemical pregnancies were significantly lower than those for the other groups (P < 0.0001): biochemical pregnancies, n = 18, 5.8 ± 8.9 mlU/ml, range 0–35; spontaneous abortions, n = 2, 46.0 ± 10.0 mlU/ml, range 39–53; ongoing/delivered pregnancies, n = 57, 41.5 ± 35.4 mlU/ml, range 0–214. In addition, day 9 Q-HCG concentrations did not differentiate between multiple implantations, although the implantation of four sacs had a significantly higher mean Q-HCG concentration compared with the implantation of fewer sacs (P > 0.0001): one sac, n = 22, 32.2 ± 21.5 mlU/ml, range 3–78; two sacs, n = 25, 35.8 ± 21.3, range 0–81; three sacs, n = 7, 47.1 ± 37.1 mlU/ml, range 22–126; four sacs, n = 4, 122.3 ± 62.4 mlU/ml, range 76–214. The positive predictive value of a Q-HCG >10 mlU/ml was 0.91 (sensitivity 91%, specificity 75%). These initial data suggest that early day 9 serum Q-HCG determinations do not accurately identify viable pregnancies or multiple implantations. Even an early negative pregnancy test should be repeated because it can be associated with a normal pregnancy.

Key words: ART pregnancies/donor oocytes/HCG/predictive value

*This paper was presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the American Fertility Society, San Antonio, TX, USA, November 5–10, 1994.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Poikkeus, V. Hiilesmaa, and A. Tiitinen
Serum HCG 12 days after embryo transfer in predicting pregnancy outcome
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1901 - 1905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.E. Sugantha, S. Webster, E. Sundar, and E.A. Lenton
Predictive value of plasma human chorionic gonadotrophin following assisted conception treatment
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 469 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.