Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 332-337, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Infertility: A randomized, assessor-blind, group-comparative efficacy study to compare the effects of Normegon® and Metrodin® in infertile female patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization

P. Devroey1,4, K. Tjandraprawira1, B. Mannaerts3, H.Coelingh Bennink3, J. Smitz1, M. Bonduelle1, A. De Brabanter1 and A.C. Van Steirteghem1

1Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium 2Centre for Medical Genetics, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium 3Medical R & D Unit, N.V. Organon PO Box 20, 5340 BH Oss, The Netherlands

Correspondence: 4To whom correspondence should be addressed

A randomized, assessor-blind, group-comparative study was performed to compare the efficacy of Normegon® [75 IU follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and 25 IU luteinizing hormone (LH)] and Metrodin® (75 IU FSH and <1.25 IU LH) in infertile women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer. None of the patients were pituitary-suppressed by means of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist treatment. They were randomized in blocks of five with a ratio between treatment with Normegon and with Metrodin of 3: 2. A total of 158 patients started hormonal treatment, i.e. 93 patients with Normegon and 65 patients with Metrodin and a total of 248 cycles were performed. Evaluation of first treatment cycles included statistical analysis of the total number of ampoules, number of follicles (≥14 mm), serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of HCG (10 000 IU) administration, the number of oocytes retrieved and the ongoing pregnancy rate per attempt and per transfer. For none of these parameters were significant differences revealed. In both groups the median duration of stimulation was 7 days and the median number of ampoules used was 21. Overall, the duration of treatment was short in order to prevent as much as possible endogenous LH rises. The overall ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer of all cycles was 21% in the Normegon group and 19% in the Metrodin group. Analysis of completed treatment cycles (n = 90) with premature rises of LH >10.0 IU/l and/or progesterone >1.0 ng/l revealed a relatively high incidence (23%) of fertilization failure and poor embryo quality, but the ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer was still 22%. These data suggest that premature rises of LH and progesterone are deleterious for oocyte quality but may not affect the endocrine environment of the endometrium. In conclusion, Normegon is an efficacious preparation for the induction of ovarian stimulation in infertile women undergoing IVF.

Key words: FSH to LH ratio/in vitro fertilization/rises of endogenous LH


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Zikopoulos, W. Verpoest, M. Camus, H. Joris, A.C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
Should we advise patients undergoing IVF to start a cycle leading to a day 3 or a day 5 transfer?
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2550 - 2554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Platteau, E. Laurent, C. Albano, K. Osmanagaoglu, V. Vernaeve, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
An open, randomized single-centre study to compare the efficacy and convenience of follitropin {beta} administered by a pen device with follitropin {alpha} administered by a conventional syringe in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1200 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tavaniotou, C. Albano, J. Smitz, and P. Devroey
Comparison of LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase in IVF cycles after treatment with HMG alone or in association with the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 663 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Filicori, G. E. Cognigni, S. Taraborrelli, D. Spettoli, W. Ciampaglia, C. Tabarelli de Fatis, and P. Pocognoli
Luteinizing Hormone Activity Supplementation Enhances Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Efficacy and Improves Ovulation Induction Outcome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1999; 84(8): 2659 - 2663.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.