Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, F.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Chou, H.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, F.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Chou, H.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, No. 7, pp. 1427-1432, 1996
© 1996 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Surgery: Laparoscopic myomectomy of large symptomatic leiomyoma using airlift gasless laparoscopy: a preliminary report

Fu-Hsing Chang, Yung-Kuei Soong1, Po-Jen Cheng, Chyi-Long Lee, Ying-Ming Lai, Hsin-Shih Wang and Hung-Hsueh Chou

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Medical School, Lmkou Medical Center, 5 Fu-Hsing Street, kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan 10591

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

Despite the expanding role of laparoscopic surgery in many gynaecological fields, some discrepancies still exist regarding the efficacy of laparoscopic myomectomy in treating patients with large symptomatic leiomyoma. in this report,, a better operative procedure and the results of treatment are evaluated. Patients (n = 14) presenting with infertility, menorrhagia, pressure symptoms or pelvic mass associated with a large leiomyoma were managed with laparoscopic myomectomy using airlift gasless laparoscopy. Uterine size ranged from 14 to 24 weeks gestational age and the weight of the myoma ranged from 246 to 669 g (mean 454); operatIve time ranged from 78 to 165 mm (mean 104) and blood loss from 90 to 580 ml (mean 201). No major complication occurred during the operation or follow-up. All except one patient were discharged within 72 h of the operation and resumed normal activity within 1 week. When myomectomy is Indicated, the airlift gasless laparoscopic approach appears to offer a better alternative to abdominal or pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic surgery in selected cases. Airlift gasless laparoscopy has several advantages: (i) small abdominal incisions and minimal endoscopic equipment are required; (ii) the excised leiomy omata mass can be easily cut into strips and removed through the small abdominal incision; (iii) the uterine defect can be more efficiently repaired using easily per formed suture techniques; (iv) high-pressure irrigation and large-volume suction devices can be used without fear of decompressing the pneumoperitonewn; and (v) the poten tial risk of metabolic and haemodynamic derangements during pneumoperitoneum laparoscopy are obviated. Gasless laparoscopy also has some disadvantages. The exposure obtained with gasless laparoscopy is not as good, under some circumstances, as that achieved by pneumoperi toneum. For patients who are thin, and even those with moderate obesity, the exposure obtained with airlift mechanical suspension is adequate however, morbidly obese patients and patients with previous abdominal sur gery with suspected pelvic adhesions can incur some prob lems during the operation because of a poor operative field.

Key words: airlift gasless laparoscopy/conventional surgical


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SURG INNOVHome page
A. Alijani and A. Cuschieri
Abdominal Wall Lift Systems in Laparoscopic Surgery: Gasless and Low-pressure Systems
Surgical Innovation, March 1, 2001; 8(1): 53 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.