Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Handelsman, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Handelsman, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 2701-2705, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Sperm output of healthy men in Australia: magnitude of bias due to self- selected volunteers

DJ Handelsman
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Department of Medicine (D02), University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Controversial claims, based on a meta-analysis aggregating 61 heterogeneous observational studies, have been made that human sperm output has decreased by 50% over the last six decades and that this trend may be due to global pollution. If true, such effects should be evident in all areas of the globe; however, longitudinal studies within single centres in Europe and America have produced conflicting results and there are no reports from the southern hemisphere. We therefore reviewed semen analyses obtained from 1980-1995 from 689 healthy men volunteering for screening either as potential sperm donors for a donor insemination programme (n = 509) or to participate in five male contraception research studies (studies no. 1-5, n = 180). All were recruited through the Andrology Unit of the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, by the same doctors using standard methods of recruiting, screening and laboratory examination throughout the period 1980-1995. Recruitment was by advertising without regard to marital or fertility status except in two contraceptive efficacy studies (no. 1 and no. 3) where participants had to be in a stable relationship requiring contraception. Analysing the first semen sample individually or when grouped by year of ejaculation, there was no significant difference in sperm concentration over time or between years or according to year of birth. During the second half of this period, 180 consecutive volunteers were recruited by the same doctors and staff for five male contraception studies. The median sperm concentration for studies no. 1 (103 x 10(6) ml) and no. 2 (142 x 10(6) ml) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than for studies no. 3-5 (84, 67 and 63 x 10(6) ml, respectively) and for potential sperm donors (median 69 x 10(6) ml). The inconsistency of these estimates illustrates the magnitude of bias (up to 100%) in sperm output that may occur in recruiting groups of self-referred volunteers within a single centre. This highlights the invalidity of extrapolating similar findings on sperm output of self-selected volunteers to the general male community or in using such study groups to characterize sperm output in supposedly 'normal' men.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. N. Zhuang, L. P. Ly, R. G. Cumming, and D. J. Handelsman
Growth and Development during Early Manhood as Determinants of Prostate Size in Later Life
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 6055 - 6063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. P. Ly, P. Y. Liu, and D. J. Handelsman
Rates of suppression and recovery of human sperm output in testosterone-based hormonal contraceptive regimens
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1733 - 1740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Eustache, J. Auger, D. Cabrol, and P. Jouannet
Are volunteers delivering semen samples in fertility studies a biased population?
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2831 - 2837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Muller, E. De La Rochebrochard, C. Labbe-Decleves, P. Jouannet, L. Bujan, R. Mieusset, D. Le Lannou, J.F. Guerin, M. Benchaib, R. Slama, et al.
Selection bias in semen studies due to self-selection of volunteers
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2838 - 2844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K.K. Ng, R. Donat, L. Chan, A. Lalak, I. Di Pierro, and D.J. Handelsman
Sperm output of older men
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1811 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
D. J. Handelsman
Optimal Power Transformations for Analysis of Sperm Concentration and Other Semen Variables
J Androl, September 1, 2002; 23(5): 629 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Kelleher, S.M. Wishart, P.Y. Liu, L. Turner, I. Di Pierro, A.J. Conway, and D.J. Handelsman
Long-term outcomes of elective human sperm cryostorage
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2632 - 2639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T.M. Stewart, E.H. Brown, A. Venn, M.T. Mbizvo, T.M.M. Farley, C. Garrett, and H.W.G. Baker
Feasibility of surveillance of changes in human fertility and semen quality
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2001; 16(1): 177 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. J. Handelsman, S. Wishart, and A. J. Conway
Oestradiol enhances testosterone-induced suppression of human spermatogenesis
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 672 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Andolz, M.A. Bielsa, and J. Vila
Evolution of semen quality in North-eastern Spain: a study in 22 759 infertile men over a 36 year period
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 14(3): 731 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.