Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horne, G.
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horne, G.
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 542-547, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

A prospective evaluation of cryopreservation strategies in a two-embryo transfer programme

G Horne, JD Critchlow, MC Newman, L Edozien, PL Matson and BA Lieberman
Department of Reproductive Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.

A total of 364 consecutive patients requesting in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment were divided randomly into two groups. In the first group, two embryos in the original IVF cycle were allowed to divide prior to transfer, with any remaining embryos being cryopreserved at the pronucleate (PN) stage. In the second group, all the embryos were allowed to divide to the early cleavage (EC) stage, and the best two replaced; any suitable remaining embryos were frozen at the 2- to 4- cell stage. A total of 134 cycles (36.8%) fulfilled the study criteria for a fresh embryo replacement and supernumerary embryos cryopreserved. In the PN group, 72 out of 182 (39.6%) patients had a fresh embryo replacement accompanied by embryo cryopreservation, which was not significantly different from the EC group (62/182; 34.1%). The livebirth rate per fresh embryo transfer in the EC group (17/62; 27.4%) was significantly higher than that for the PN group (8/72; 11.1%; P < 0.05). Embryo survival following thawing was similar for the PN (96/129; 74.4%) and EC (79/102; 77.4%) stages. Although not significant, the livebirth rate following the transfer of thawed embryos was higher in the PN group (11/44; 25.0%) than in the EC group (4/38; 10.5%). Following one fresh and two freeze-thaw embryo replacements, the observed cumulative viable pregnancy rates were comparable for patients in both the PN (40.2%) and EC (41.1%) groups.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Griesinger, S. von Otte, A. Schroer, A.K. Ludwig, K. Diedrich, S. Al-Hasani, and A. Schultze-Mosgau
Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1348 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Nawroth and M. Ludwig
What is the 'ideal' duration of progesterone supplementation before the transfer of cryopreserved-thawed embryos in estrogen/progesterone replacement protocols?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1127 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Horne, A.D. Atkinson, E.H.E. Pease, J.P. Logue, D.R. Brison, and B.A. Lieberman
Live birth with sperm cryopreserved for 21 years prior to cancer treatment: Case report
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1448 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Salumets, T. Tuuri, S. Makinen, S. Vilska, L. Husu, R. Tainio, and A.-M. Suikkari
Effect of developmental stage of embryo at freezing on pregnancy outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1890 - 1895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.