Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van der Elst, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van der Elst, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 1513-1521, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Selective transfer of cryopreserved human embryos with further cleavage after thawing increases delivery and implantation rates

J Van der Elst, E Van den Abbeel, S Vitrier, M Camus, P Devroey and AC Van Steirteghem
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University Hospital, Belgium.

We investigated whether further in-vitro culture of human multicellular embryos that survive cryopreservation can select the viable embryos for transfer. Embryos for cryopreservation were supernumerary multicellular embryos obtained after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments, with <20% of their volume filled with anucleate fragments. These had been cryopreserved using a slow-freezing and slow-thawing protocol with 1.5 M dimethylsulphoxide as the cryoprotectant. From the start of our cryopreservation programme until September 12, 1994, the thawing strategy was to thaw frozen embryos up to the exact number needed for transfer. Embryos for transfer were selected on the basis of their morphological appearance and embryo transfer to the patient was done on the day of thawing. From September 12, 1994 onwards we used a more selective thawing strategy where a cohort of up to a maximum of 12 frozen embryos per patient is thawed from which embryos of the best morphological quality, and which are furthest advanced in terms of cleavage after a 24 h in-vitro culture period in Menezo B2 medium, are selected. We took delivery rates, embryo implantation rates and birth rates into account to see if there is any difference between the following three types of transfers used: 187 transfers exclusively of embryos having continued to cleave after thawing, 107 mixed transfers of embryos with and without further cleavage and 53 transfers exclusively of embryos with no further cleavage. The overall outcome in terms of delivery rate and embryo implantation and birth rates were not different between the new and the earlier thawing policies (6.6, 5.2 and 3.6% versus 6.0, 4.1 and 2.7% respectively). Only when a distinction was made between transfers on the basis of the presence of embryos with further cleavage, did the advantage of selection on the basis of cleavage capacity become evident. Significantly higher delivery and embryo implantation and birth rates (11.2, 7.7 and 6.5% respectively) were recorded with transfers exclusively of embryos with further cleavage versus mixed transfers of embryos with and without further cleavage (1.9, 2.9 and 0.6% respectively). Fifty-three transfers exclusively of embryos with no further cleavage did not lead to any delivery. Our results demonstrate that selection of human multicellular embryos which survive cryopreservation and continue to cleave in vitro can significantly improve the delivery rate per transfer and the implantation rate per transferred embryo.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Belva, S. Henriet, E. Van den Abbeel, M. Camus, P. Devroey, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, P. Haentjens, and M. Bonduelle
Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2227 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Salumets, A.-M. Suikkari, S. Makinen, H. Karro, A. Roos, and T. Tuuri
Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2368 - 2374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Tang, J. Catt, and D. Howlett
Towards defining parameters for a successful single embryo transfer in frozen cycles
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1179 - 1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Hyden-Granskog, L. Unkila-Kallio, M. Halttunen, and A. Tiitinen
Single embryo transfer is an option in frozen embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2935 - 2938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Revel, A. Safran, N. Laufer, A. Lewin, B.E. Reubinov, and A. Simon
Twin delivery following 12 years of human embryo cryopreservation: Case report
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 328 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Salumets, T. Tuuri, S. Makinen, S. Vilska, L. Husu, R. Tainio, and A.-M. Suikkari
Effect of developmental stage of embryo at freezing on pregnancy outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1890 - 1895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. El-Toukhy, Y. Khalaf, K. Al-Darazi, F. O'Mahony, E. Wharf, A. Taylor, and P. Braude
Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1313 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Guerif, R. Bidault, V. Cadoret, M.-L. Couet, J. Lansac, and D. Royere
Parameters guiding selection of best embryos for transfer after cryopreservation: a reappraisal
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1321 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tiitinen, M. Halttunen, P. Harkki, P. Vuoristo, and C. Hyden-Granskog
Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1140 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Van den Abbeel and A. Van Steirteghem
Zona pellucida damage to human embryos after cryopreservation and the consequences for their blastomere survival and in-vitro viability
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 373 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.H. Edgar, H. Bourne, A.L. Speirs, and J.C. McBain
A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 175 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.L. Mauri, C.G. Petersen, R.L.R. Baruffi, R.C. Ferreira, and J.G. Franco Jr
Clinical experience with ultrarapid cryopreservation of human embryos resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Brief communication
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 14(9): 2362 - 2366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. De Vos, H. Van de Velde, H. Joris, and A. Van Steirteghem
In-vitro matured metaphase-I oocytes have a lower fertilization rate but similar embryo quality as mature metaphase-II oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1859 - 1863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.