Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 1927-1930, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press
P Seinera, R Arisio, A Decko, C Farina and F Crana
The indications and complications of laparoscopic myomectomy were evaluated
with regard to its limitations, benefits and feasibility. Surgical
technique with related difficulty was also reported. From a population of
89 patients, a total of 104 myomas were removed laparoscopically. A
retrospective study was carried out of 54 patients with myomas >3 cm.
Indications for surgery were pain or abnormal bleeding (37%), increase in
size of the myoma in infertile patients (48.1%) and infertility requiring
assisted reproductive technology (14.9%). A total of 57 myomas >3 cm
were removed from these patients. The number of myomas per patient varied
from 1 to 4. The myomas were intramural (n = 34), subserosal (n = 19) and
submucosal (n = 4). The size of the dominant myoma ranged from 3-8 cm (mean
4.16). In all cases the uterine wall was sutured either in one (n = 42) or
two planes (n = 15) depending on the depth of the myometrial defect. The
laparotomy conversion rate was 1.8% (n = 1); mean blood loss was 84 ml;
average hospital stay was 2.09 days and the overall complication rate was
1.8%. Five patients went on to conceive; the pregnancy was uneventful and
proceeded to Caesarean section at 38 weeks. No adhesions at myomectomy
sites were observed in these patients. At 6 months follow-up, 18 out of 20
patients with pain or haemorrhagic disorders prior to surgery showed
remission of their complaints. Our study confirms the feasibility of
laparoscopic myomectomy as a technique leading to a low complication rate
and remission of symptoms. At the present time, statistically significant
data concerning post-surgical adhesion formation or pregnancy outcome are
not available.
ARTICLES
Laparoscopic myomectomy: indications, surgical technique and complications
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Turin, S.Anna Hospital, Italy.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P.-L. Torng, J.-S. Hwang, S.-C. Huang, W.-C. Chang, S.-Y. Chen, D.-Y. Chang, and W.-C. Hsu Effect of simultaneous morcellation in situ on operative time during laparoscopic myomectomy Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2220 - 2226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Al-Hendy and S. Salama Gene therapy and uterine leiomyoma: a review Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 385 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Donnez and P. Jadoul What are the implications of myomas on fertility?: A need for a debate? Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1424 - 1430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. Dubuisson, A. Fauconnier, V. Fourchotte, K. Babaki-Fard, J. Coste, and C. Chapron Laparoscopic myomectomy: predicting the risk of conversion to an open procedure Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1726 - 1731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Seinera, C. Farina, and T. Todros Laparoscopic myomectomy and subsequent pregnancy: results in 54 patients Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1993 - 1996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. Dubuisson, A. Fauconnier, J.-V. Deffarges, C. Norgaard, G. Kreiker, and C. Chapron Pregnancy outcome and deliveries following laparoscopic myomectomy Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2000; 15(4): 869 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Seinera, P. Gaglioti, E. Volpi, M. A. Cau, and T. Todros Ultrasound evaluation of uterine wound healing following laparoscopic myomectomy: preliminary results Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2460 - 2463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Nezhat, F. Nezhat, M. Roemisch, D. S. Seidman, S. I. Tazuke, and C. R. Nezhat Pregnancy following laparoscopic myomectomy: preliminary results Hum. Reprod., May 1, 1999; 14(5): 1219 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Campo and N. Garcea Laparoscopic myomectomy in premenopausal women with and without preoperative treatment using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 14(1): 44 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

