Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 78-83, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press
M Commenges-Ducos, S Tricaud, A Papaxanthos-Roche, D Dallay, J Horovitz and D Commenges
The aim of this study was to find the factors explaining the probability of
success of in-vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer and its different
stages: stimulation, fertilization and implantation. The sample came from a
retrospective cohort followed in the IVF-embryo transfer centre of the
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France; the data
from 471 couples giving rise to 923 IVF- embryo transfer cycles were
recorded. Four logistic regression models were specified for global
process, stimulation, fertilization and implantation stages. Random effect
models were used for taking into account the correlations of the different
cycles for the same woman. The main outcome measures were: ongoing
pregnancy, number of oocytes, number of embryos. A total of 135 ongoing
pregnancies was observed. The significant explanatory variables were for
global process: age [> or = 38 years: odds ratio (OR) = 0.28], donor
sperm IVF-embryo transfer (OR = 2.1), number of ampoules (OR = 0.98),
previous IVF-embryo transfer livebirth (OR = 2.36); for stimulation: age
(> or = 35 years: OR = 0.38) and number of days of treatment > 13
days (OR = 0.20); for fertilization: accident during previous IVF-embryo
transfer gestation (OR = 0.39), absolute tubal infertility (OR = 1.38) and
the number of ampoules of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) per day (OR
= 0.85); for implantation: age (age > or = 38 years: OR = 0.34), donor
sperm IVF- embryo transfer (OR = 4.58), number of ampoules (OR = 0.98),
number and quality of the embryos. Estimates of the probabilities of
success are also given for the global process.
ARTICLES
Modelling of the probability of success of the stages of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: stimulation, fertilization and implantation
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Leushuis, J. W. van der Steeg, P. Steures, P. M.M. Bossuyt, M. J.C. Eijkemans, F. van der Veen, B. W.J. Mol, and P. G.A. Hompes Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2009; 15(5): 537 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.J. Goverde, J. McDonnell, R. Schats, J.P.W. Vermeiden, R. Homburg, and C.B. Lambalk Ovarian response to standard gonadotrophin stimulation for IVF is decreased not only in older but also in younger women in couples with idiopathic and male subfertility Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1573 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Penarrubia, F. Fabregues, D. Manau, M. Creus, G. Casals, R. Casamitjana, F. Carmona, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotropin treatment Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 915 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gerris, D. De Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, J. Barudy-Vasquez, M. Valkenburg, and G. Ryckaert Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2626 - 2631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fawzy, A. Lambert, R.F. Harrison, P.G. Knight, N. Groome, B. Hennelly, and W.R. Robertson Day 5 inhibin B levels in a treatment cycle are predictive of IVF outcome Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1535 - 1543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sitko, M. Commenges-Ducos, P. Roland, A. Papaxanthos-Roche, J. Horovitz, and D. Dallay IVF following impossible or failed surgical reversal of tubal sterilization Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 683 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Van Royen, K. Mangelschots, D. De Neubourg, I. Laureys, G. Ryckaert, and J. Gerris Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 326 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gerris and E. Van Royen Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: A plea for single embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1884 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Penarrubia, J. Balasch, F. Fabregues, F. Carmona, R. Casamitjana, V. Moreno, J. M Calafell, and J. A. Vanrell Day 5 inhibin B serum concentrations as predictors of assisted reproductive technology outcome in cycles stimulated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotrophin treatment Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1499 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

