Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKiernan, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bavister, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKiernan, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bavister, B. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 724-729, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Gonadotrophin stimulation of donor females decreases post-implantation viability of cultured one-cell hamster embryos

SH McKiernan and BD Bavister
Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706, USA.

Hamster one-cell embryos were collected from two groups of donors: females that were super-stimulated with pregnant mare's serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) and females that were not. Embryos were cultured for 72 h and scored for development. Morulae and blastocysts from the PMSG- and non-stimulated females were transferred into contralateral uterine horns of non-stimulated recipient females, so that experimental embryos (from PMSG-stimulated females) and control embryos (from non- stimulated females) were paired within a single recipient. Right and left uterine horns of recipient females were examined 11 days later for the number of implantation sites and fetuses. After 72 h of culture, development to morulae and blastocysts was not significantly different for embryos from PMSG- and non-stimulated females. However, embryos from PMSG-stimulated females compared to controls had significantly reduced mean cell numbers (18 versus 21; P=0.003) and a two-fold decrease in viability post-transfer (20 versus 45%; P=0.02). These findings indicate that gonadotrophin stimulation compromises subsequent developmental competence either during oocyte maturation or in the very early embryo, but it is unclear whether reduced viability is a direct effect or is an indirect consequence of PMSG stimulation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Sato, E. Otsu, H. Negishi, T. Utsunomiya, and T. Arima
Aberrant DNA methylation of imprinted loci in superovulated oocytes
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 26 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Roberts, J. Stark, A. Iatropoulou, D. L. Becker, S. Franks, and K. Hardy
Energy Substrate Metabolism of Mouse Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes: Response to Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Is Mediated by the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathway and Is Associated with Oocyte Maturation
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 199 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Ishigame, M. S. Medan, G. Watanabe, Z. Shi, H. Kishi, K. Y. Arai, and K. Taya
A New Alternative Method for Superovulation Using Passive Immunization Against Inhibin in Adult Rats
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 236 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. M.H. Combelles and D. F. Albertini
Assessment of Oocyte Quality Following Repeated Gonadotropin Stimulation in the Mouse
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 812 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Van der Auwera and T. D'Hooghe
Superovulation of female mice delays embryonic and fetal development
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1237 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Van Blerkom and P. Davis
Differential effects of repeated ovarian stimulation on cytoplasmic and spindle organization in metaphase II mouse oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 757 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Ertzeid and R. Storeng
The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 221 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. J. Tarin and A. Cano
Do human concepti have the potential to enter into diapause?
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2434 - 2436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.